<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Unemployment Reaches Record Levels, But Rate of Increase Slows</title> <atom:link href="http://seattlebubble.com/blog/2009/04/15/unemployment-reaches-record-levels-but-rate-of-increase-slows/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://seattlebubble.com/blog/2009/04/15/unemployment-reaches-record-levels-but-rate-of-increase-slows/</link> <description>local real estate news, statistics, and commentary without the sales spin.</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 07:12:21 -0700</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: matthew</title><link>http://seattlebubble.com/blog/2009/04/15/unemployment-reaches-record-levels-but-rate-of-increase-slows/#comment-70816</link> <dc:creator>matthew</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:23:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://seattlebubble.com/blog/?p=5132#comment-70816</guid> <description>Is unemployment really a lagging indicator in a consumer based economy?  Probably not nearly as lagging as it is in a manufacturing economy.  Decreased spending = decreased service based jobs = more unemploymentI don&#039;t know what gets us out of this hole, but something tells me we aren&#039;t going to see the massive surge in manufacturing like we did in the 1940&#039;s that got us out of the Great Depression.&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;70816&#039;,&#039;matthew&#039;,&#039;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;70816&#039;,&#039;matthew&#039;,&#039;Is unemployment really a lagging indicator in a consumer based economy?  Probably not nearly as lagging as it is in a manufacturing economy.  Decreased spending = decreased service based jobs = more unemployment\r\n\r\nI don\&#039;t know what gets us out of this hole, but something tells me we aren\&#039;t going to see the massive surge in manufacturing like we did in the 1940\&#039;s that got us out of the Great Depression.&#039;,&#039;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is unemployment really a lagging indicator in a consumer based economy?  Probably not nearly as lagging as it is in a manufacturing economy.  Decreased spending = decreased service based jobs = more unemployment</p><p>I don&#8217;t know what gets us out of this hole, but something tells me we aren&#8217;t going to see the massive surge in manufacturing like we did in the 1940&#8217;s that got us out of the Great Depression.<div
class="comment-remix-meta"><a
href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('70816','matthew',''); return false;">Reply</a> &#8211; <a
href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('70816','matthew','Is unemployment really a lagging indicator in a consumer based economy?  Probably not nearly as lagging as it is in a manufacturing economy.  Decreased spending = decreased service based jobs = more unemployment\r\n\r\nI don\'t know what gets us out of this hole, but something tells me we aren\'t going to see the massive surge in manufacturing like we did in the 1940\'s that got us out of the Great Depression.',''); return false;">Quote</a></div> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jonness</title><link>http://seattlebubble.com/blog/2009/04/15/unemployment-reaches-record-levels-but-rate-of-increase-slows/#comment-70808</link> <dc:creator>Jonness</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 02:14:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://seattlebubble.com/blog/?p=5132#comment-70808</guid> <description>Thanks Tim. That makes sense.&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;70808&#039;,&#039;Jonness&#039;,&#039;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;70808&#039;,&#039;Jonness&#039;,&#039;Thanks Tim. That makes sense.&#039;,&#039;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Tim. That makes sense.<div
class="comment-remix-meta"><a
href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('70808','Jonness',''); return false;">Reply</a> &#8211; <a
href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('70808','Jonness','Thanks Tim. That makes sense.',''); return false;">Quote</a></div> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: dancingeek</title><link>http://seattlebubble.com/blog/2009/04/15/unemployment-reaches-record-levels-but-rate-of-increase-slows/#comment-70784</link> <dc:creator>dancingeek</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 17:33:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://seattlebubble.com/blog/?p=5132#comment-70784</guid> <description></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>RE:</b> <a
href='#comment-70776' rel="nofollow">Scott Weitz @ 32</a> &#8211; &#8220;In fact, I have serious doubts as to the effectiveness of the â€™stimulusâ€™. Wasnâ€™t education not a huge portion of the bill?&#8221;</p><p>Looks like education wasn&#8217;t in fact a huge portion of the bill. <a
href="http://www.recovery.gov/?q=content/investments" rel="nofollow">Here is the breakdown.</a> There is also the fact that educational institutions move slowly.  Money that hasn&#8217;t really been distributed yet can&#8217;t really be used yet.  It will still be some time before we see the effects of the stimulus in education.<div
class="comment-remix-meta"><a
href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('70784','dancingeek',''); return false;">Reply</a> &#8211; <a
href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('70784','dancingeek','&lt;b&gt;RE:&lt;\/b&gt; &lt;a href=\'#comment-70776\' rel=\&quot;nofollow\&quot;&gt;Scott Weitz @ 32&lt;\/a&gt; - \&quot;In fact, I have serious doubts as to the effectiveness of the &acirc;€™stimulus&acirc;€™. Wasn&acirc;€™t education not a huge portion of the bill?\&quot;\n\nLooks like education wasn\'t in fact a huge portion of the bill. &lt;a href=\&quot;http:\/\/www.recovery.gov\/?q=content\/investments\&quot; rel=\&quot;nofollow\&quot;&gt;Here is the breakdown.&lt;\/a&gt;  There is also the fact that educational institutions move slowly.  Money that hasn\'t really been distributed yet can\'t really be used yet.  It will still be some time before we see the effects of the stimulus in education.',''); return false;">Quote</a></div> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: The Tim</title><link>http://seattlebubble.com/blog/2009/04/15/unemployment-reaches-record-levels-but-rate-of-increase-slows/#comment-70777</link> <dc:creator>The Tim</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 17:10:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://seattlebubble.com/blog/?p=5132#comment-70777</guid> <description>&lt;b&gt;RE:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href=&#039;#comment-70730&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Amir @ 19&lt;/a&gt; &amp; &lt;a href=&#039;#comment-70744&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Jonness @ 26&lt;/a&gt; - I think the difference is that I am posting the non &quot;seasonally adjusted&quot; figures, and other sources are reporting the &quot;seasonally adjusted&quot; data.  You can view the data directly by downloading the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.workforceexplorer.com/admin/uploadedPublications/1886_laus_historical.xls&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Residential Civilian Labor Force Historical Rates spreadsheet&lt;/a&gt; from the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.workforceexplorer.com/cgi/dataanalysis/?PAGEID=94&amp;SUBID=149&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Workforce Explorer&lt;/a&gt; site.&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;70777&#039;,&#039;The Tim&#039;,&#039;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;70777&#039;,&#039;The Tim&#039;,&#039;&lt;b&gt;RE:&lt;\/b&gt; &lt;a href=\&#039;#comment-70730\&#039; rel=\&quot;nofollow\&quot;&gt;Amir @ 19&lt;\/a&gt; &amp; &lt;a href=\&#039;#comment-70744\&#039; rel=\&quot;nofollow\&quot;&gt;Jonness @ 26&lt;\/a&gt; - I think the difference is that I am posting the non \&quot;seasonally adjusted\&quot; figures, and other sources are reporting the \&quot;seasonally adjusted\&quot; data.  You can view the data directly by downloading the &lt;a href=\&quot;http:\/\/www.workforceexplorer.com\/admin\/uploadedPublications\/1886_laus_historical.xls\&quot; rel=\&quot;nofollow\&quot;&gt;Residential Civilian Labor Force Historical Rates spreadsheet&lt;\/a&gt; from the &lt;a href=\&quot;http:\/\/www.workforceexplorer.com\/cgi\/dataanalysis\/?PAGEID=94&amp;SUBID=149\&quot; rel=\&quot;nofollow\&quot;&gt;Workforce Explorer&lt;\/a&gt; site.&#039;,&#039;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>RE:</b> <a
href='#comment-70730' rel="nofollow">Amir @ 19</a> &#038; <a
href='#comment-70744' rel="nofollow">Jonness @ 26</a> &#8211; I think the difference is that I am posting the non &#8220;seasonally adjusted&#8221; figures, and other sources are reporting the &#8220;seasonally adjusted&#8221; data.  You can view the data directly by downloading the <a
href="http://www.workforceexplorer.com/admin/uploadedPublications/1886_laus_historical.xls" rel="nofollow">Residential Civilian Labor Force Historical Rates spreadsheet</a> from the <a
href="http://www.workforceexplorer.com/cgi/dataanalysis/?PAGEID=94&#038;SUBID=149" rel="nofollow">Workforce Explorer</a> site.<div
class="comment-remix-meta"><a
href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('70777','The Tim',''); return false;">Reply</a> &#8211; <a
href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('70777','The Tim','&lt;b&gt;RE:&lt;\/b&gt; &lt;a href=\'#comment-70730\' rel=\&quot;nofollow\&quot;&gt;Amir @ 19&lt;\/a&gt; &amp; &lt;a href=\'#comment-70744\' rel=\&quot;nofollow\&quot;&gt;Jonness @ 26&lt;\/a&gt; - I think the difference is that I am posting the non \&quot;seasonally adjusted\&quot; figures, and other sources are reporting the \&quot;seasonally adjusted\&quot; data.  You can view the data directly by downloading the &lt;a href=\&quot;http:\/\/www.workforceexplorer.com\/admin\/uploadedPublications\/1886_laus_historical.xls\&quot; rel=\&quot;nofollow\&quot;&gt;Residential Civilian Labor Force Historical Rates spreadsheet&lt;\/a&gt; from the &lt;a href=\&quot;http:\/\/www.workforceexplorer.com\/cgi\/dataanalysis\/?PAGEID=94&amp;SUBID=149\&quot; rel=\&quot;nofollow\&quot;&gt;Workforce Explorer&lt;\/a&gt; site.',''); return false;">Quote</a></div> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Scott Weitz</title><link>http://seattlebubble.com/blog/2009/04/15/unemployment-reaches-record-levels-but-rate-of-increase-slows/#comment-70776</link> <dc:creator>Scott Weitz</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 17:06:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://seattlebubble.com/blog/?p=5132#comment-70776</guid> <description>Jonness-Good question. The answer to that question could make a person very rich person. Personally, I think that while the intense inflationary policies enacted will provide a parachute to the economy, it will not be enough to overcome the gravitational forces that are pulling it down. At the end of the day, fundamentals always prevail.In fact, I have serious doubts as to the effectiveness of the &#039;stimulus&#039;. Wasn&#039;t education not a huge portion of the bill?...yet colleges across the country are facing enormous budget deficits....doesn&#039;t seem to add up.&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;70776&#039;,&#039;Scott Weitz&#039;,&#039;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;70776&#039;,&#039;Scott Weitz&#039;,&#039;Jonness-\r\n\r\nGood question. The answer to that question could make a person very rich person. Personally, I think that while the intense inflationary policies enacted will provide a parachute to the economy, it will not be enough to overcome the gravitational forces that are pulling it down. At the end of the day, fundamentals always prevail. \r\n\r\nIn fact, I have serious doubts as to the effectiveness of the \&#039;stimulus\&#039;. Wasn\&#039;t education not a huge portion of the bill?...yet colleges across the country are facing enormous budget deficits....doesn\&#039;t seem to add up.&#039;,&#039;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonness-</p><p>Good question. The answer to that question could make a person very rich person. Personally, I think that while the intense inflationary policies enacted will provide a parachute to the economy, it will not be enough to overcome the gravitational forces that are pulling it down. At the end of the day, fundamentals always prevail.</p><p>In fact, I have serious doubts as to the effectiveness of the &#8217;stimulus&#8217;. Wasn&#8217;t education not a huge portion of the bill?&#8230;yet colleges across the country are facing enormous budget deficits&#8230;.doesn&#8217;t seem to add up.<div
class="comment-remix-meta"><a
href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('70776','Scott Weitz',''); return false;">Reply</a> &#8211; <a
href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('70776','Scott Weitz','Jonness-\r\n\r\nGood question. The answer to that question could make a person very rich person. Personally, I think that while the intense inflationary policies enacted will provide a parachute to the economy, it will not be enough to overcome the gravitational forces that are pulling it down. At the end of the day, fundamentals always prevail. \r\n\r\nIn fact, I have serious doubts as to the effectiveness of the \'stimulus\'. Wasn\'t education not a huge portion of the bill?...yet colleges across the country are facing enormous budget deficits....doesn\'t seem to add up.',''); return false;">Quote</a></div> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: EconE</title><link>http://seattlebubble.com/blog/2009/04/15/unemployment-reaches-record-levels-but-rate-of-increase-slows/#comment-70752</link> <dc:creator>EconE</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 06:30:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://seattlebubble.com/blog/?p=5132#comment-70752</guid> <description>One more thing to add.  Not to be a doom-n-gloomer...but shouldn&#039;t we also consider the fact that some of the people who were once part of the unemployment statistics (6 months ago), are now re-employed but at substantially lower wages?I think it will be interesting to follow median incomes over the next couple years.&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;70752&#039;,&#039;EconE&#039;,&#039;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;70752&#039;,&#039;EconE&#039;,&#039;One more thing to add.  Not to be a doom-n-gloomer...but shouldn\&#039;t we also consider the fact that some of the people who were once part of the unemployment statistics (6 months ago), are now re-employed but at substantially lower wages?  \r\n\r\nI think it will be interesting to follow median incomes over the next couple years.&#039;,&#039;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One more thing to add.  Not to be a doom-n-gloomer&#8230;but shouldn&#8217;t we also consider the fact that some of the people who were once part of the unemployment statistics (6 months ago), are now re-employed but at substantially lower wages?</p><p>I think it will be interesting to follow median incomes over the next couple years.<div
class="comment-remix-meta"><a
href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('70752','EconE',''); return false;">Reply</a> &#8211; <a
href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('70752','EconE','One more thing to add.  Not to be a doom-n-gloomer...but shouldn\'t we also consider the fact that some of the people who were once part of the unemployment statistics (6 months ago), are now re-employed but at substantially lower wages?  \r\n\r\nI think it will be interesting to follow median incomes over the next couple years.',''); return false;">Quote</a></div> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jonness</title><link>http://seattlebubble.com/blog/2009/04/15/unemployment-reaches-record-levels-but-rate-of-increase-slows/#comment-70751</link> <dc:creator>Jonness</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 06:06:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://seattlebubble.com/blog/?p=5132#comment-70751</guid> <description>&quot;and the printing of money that is going to eventually kill the dollar.&quot;What&#039;s your prediction on how this will affect asset prices and wages in the short, mid, and long terms?Thanks :)&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;70751&#039;,&#039;Jonness&#039;,&#039;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;70751&#039;,&#039;Jonness&#039;,&#039;\&quot;and the printing of money that is going to eventually kill the dollar.\&quot;\r\n\r\nWhat\&#039;s your prediction on how this will affect asset prices and wages in the short, mid, and long terms?\r\n\r\nThanks :)&#039;,&#039;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;and the printing of money that is going to eventually kill the dollar.&#8221;</p><p>What&#8217;s your prediction on how this will affect asset prices and wages in the short, mid, and long terms?</p><p>Thanks :)<div
class="comment-remix-meta"><a
href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('70751','Jonness',''); return false;">Reply</a> &#8211; <a
href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('70751','Jonness','\&quot;and the printing of money that is going to eventually kill the dollar.\&quot;\r\n\r\nWhat\'s your prediction on how this will affect asset prices and wages in the short, mid, and long terms?\r\n\r\nThanks :)',''); return false;">Quote</a></div> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: what goes up must come down</title><link>http://seattlebubble.com/blog/2009/04/15/unemployment-reaches-record-levels-but-rate-of-increase-slows/#comment-70750</link> <dc:creator>what goes up must come down</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 05:58:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://seattlebubble.com/blog/?p=5132#comment-70750</guid> <description>hey just cut taxes and everything will be fine -- whoops I guess we tried that before&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;70750&#039;,&#039;what goes up must come down&#039;,&#039;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;70750&#039;,&#039;what goes up must come down&#039;,&#039;hey just cut taxes and everything will be fine -- whoops I guess we tried that before&#039;,&#039;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey just cut taxes and everything will be fine &#8212; whoops I guess we tried that before<div
class="comment-remix-meta"><a
href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('70750','what goes up must come down',''); return false;">Reply</a> &#8211; <a
href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('70750','what goes up must come down','hey just cut taxes and everything will be fine -- whoops I guess we tried that before',''); return false;">Quote</a></div> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Scott Weitz</title><link>http://seattlebubble.com/blog/2009/04/15/unemployment-reaches-record-levels-but-rate-of-increase-slows/#comment-70746</link> <dc:creator>Scott Weitz</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 04:36:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://seattlebubble.com/blog/?p=5132#comment-70746</guid> <description>Sniglet is right on. He may have his own reasons, but this is why I agree:1. we are a nation built and dependant upon credit. Credit may not be gone, but it will NEVER be as attainable as it was in the boom ever again (at least not in our lifetime) as the banks have certainly learned their lesson.2. Real Estate will not bottom until significant numbers of people realize they are better off renting than owning as their payments would be significantly lower, there would be no taxes, and no upkeep expense. This will lead to foreclosures and bankruptcies that are unprecendented. Right now, many are still holding out for a &#039;rebound&#039;. We may (doubtful in real estate) get a small one, but I don&#039;t expect it to last long or be substantial.3. Where are the jobs going to be created from? Solar (who can afford huge expenditures on solar??) The govt? Good luck basing an economy on govt jobs/ spending.4. Stock market earnings are a joke right now. The &#039;rebound&#039; has been based primarily on bank earnings. No other industries have posted positive numbers this Quarter. If you follow the market, you know these earnings are a joke due to the TARP, TALF, and repeal of mark to market. These banks would all be insolvent without these tools that are pulling the wool over the eyes of the tax payor.5. Bottom line: the lifestyles of Americans will be forever altered by this crisis. I still don&#039;t belive that many grasp the enormity of some of the underlying problems from the commercial real estate collapse that is imminent to the collapse of retail. Many business owners are holding on to a thread right now. In time, they will have to let go when they realize that the &#039;rebound&#039; is not coming.6. I won&#039;t even go into the municipality struggles as a result of diminished tax collections, the social security problems (to put it nicely), and the printing of money that is going to eventually kill the dollar.I hate to sound outrageously pessimistic, but that is the bed we have made for ourselves. On the bright side, people will care more about friends and family...and value the truly important things in life once again. ...in a socialist America.&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;70746&#039;,&#039;Scott Weitz&#039;,&#039;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;70746&#039;,&#039;Scott Weitz&#039;,&#039;Sniglet is right on. He may have his own reasons, but this is why I agree: \r\n\r\n1. we are a nation built and dependant upon credit. Credit may not be gone, but it will NEVER be as attainable as it was in the boom ever again (at least not in our lifetime) as the banks have certainly learned their lesson. \r\n\r\n2. Real Estate will not bottom until significant numbers of people realize they are better off renting than owning as their payments would be significantly lower, there would be no taxes, and no upkeep expense. This will lead to foreclosures and bankruptcies that are unprecendented. Right now, many are still holding out for a \&#039;rebound\&#039;. We may (doubtful in real estate) get a small one, but I don\&#039;t expect it to last long or be substantial. \r\n\r\n3. Where are the jobs going to be created from? Solar (who can afford huge expenditures on solar??) The govt? Good luck basing an economy on govt jobs\/ spending. \r\n\r\n4. Stock market earnings are a joke right now. The \&#039;rebound\&#039; has been based primarily on bank earnings. No other industries have posted positive numbers this Quarter. If you follow the market, you know these earnings are a joke due to the TARP, TALF, and repeal of mark to market. These banks would all be insolvent without these tools that are pulling the wool over the eyes of the tax payor.  \r\n\r\n5. Bottom line: the lifestyles of Americans will be forever altered by this crisis. I still don\&#039;t belive that many grasp the enormity of some of the underlying problems from the commercial real estate collapse that is imminent to the collapse of retail. Many business owners are holding on to a thread right now. In time, they will have to let go when they realize that the \&#039;rebound\&#039; is not coming. \r\n\r\n6. I won\&#039;t even go into the municipality struggles as a result of diminished tax collections, the social security problems (to put it nicely), and the printing of money that is going to eventually kill the dollar. \r\n\r\nI hate to sound outrageously pessimistic, but that is the bed we have made for ourselves. On the bright side, people will care more about friends and family...and value the truly important things in life once again. ...in a socialist America.&#039;,&#039;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sniglet is right on. He may have his own reasons, but this is why I agree:</p><p>1. we are a nation built and dependant upon credit. Credit may not be gone, but it will NEVER be as attainable as it was in the boom ever again (at least not in our lifetime) as the banks have certainly learned their lesson.</p><p>2. Real Estate will not bottom until significant numbers of people realize they are better off renting than owning as their payments would be significantly lower, there would be no taxes, and no upkeep expense. This will lead to foreclosures and bankruptcies that are unprecendented. Right now, many are still holding out for a &#8216;rebound&#8217;. We may (doubtful in real estate) get a small one, but I don&#8217;t expect it to last long or be substantial.</p><p>3. Where are the jobs going to be created from? Solar (who can afford huge expenditures on solar??) The govt? Good luck basing an economy on govt jobs/ spending.</p><p>4. Stock market earnings are a joke right now. The &#8216;rebound&#8217; has been based primarily on bank earnings. No other industries have posted positive numbers this Quarter. If you follow the market, you know these earnings are a joke due to the TARP, TALF, and repeal of mark to market. These banks would all be insolvent without these tools that are pulling the wool over the eyes of the tax payor.</p><p>5. Bottom line: the lifestyles of Americans will be forever altered by this crisis. I still don&#8217;t belive that many grasp the enormity of some of the underlying problems from the commercial real estate collapse that is imminent to the collapse of retail. Many business owners are holding on to a thread right now. In time, they will have to let go when they realize that the &#8216;rebound&#8217; is not coming.</p><p>6. I won&#8217;t even go into the municipality struggles as a result of diminished tax collections, the social security problems (to put it nicely), and the printing of money that is going to eventually kill the dollar.</p><p>I hate to sound outrageously pessimistic, but that is the bed we have made for ourselves. On the bright side, people will care more about friends and family&#8230;and value the truly important things in life once again. &#8230;in a socialist America.<div
class="comment-remix-meta"><a
href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('70746','Scott Weitz',''); return false;">Reply</a> &#8211; <a
href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('70746','Scott Weitz','Sniglet is right on. He may have his own reasons, but this is why I agree: \r\n\r\n1. we are a nation built and dependant upon credit. Credit may not be gone, but it will NEVER be as attainable as it was in the boom ever again (at least not in our lifetime) as the banks have certainly learned their lesson. \r\n\r\n2. Real Estate will not bottom until significant numbers of people realize they are better off renting than owning as their payments would be significantly lower, there would be no taxes, and no upkeep expense. This will lead to foreclosures and bankruptcies that are unprecendented. Right now, many are still holding out for a \'rebound\'. We may (doubtful in real estate) get a small one, but I don\'t expect it to last long or be substantial. \r\n\r\n3. Where are the jobs going to be created from? Solar (who can afford huge expenditures on solar??) The govt? Good luck basing an economy on govt jobs\/ spending. \r\n\r\n4. Stock market earnings are a joke right now. The \'rebound\' has been based primarily on bank earnings. No other industries have posted positive numbers this Quarter. If you follow the market, you know these earnings are a joke due to the TARP, TALF, and repeal of mark to market. These banks would all be insolvent without these tools that are pulling the wool over the eyes of the tax payor.  \r\n\r\n5. Bottom line: the lifestyles of Americans will be forever altered by this crisis. I still don\'t belive that many grasp the enormity of some of the underlying problems from the commercial real estate collapse that is imminent to the collapse of retail. Many business owners are holding on to a thread right now. In time, they will have to let go when they realize that the \'rebound\' is not coming. \r\n\r\n6. I won\'t even go into the municipality struggles as a result of diminished tax collections, the social security problems (to put it nicely), and the printing of money that is going to eventually kill the dollar. \r\n\r\nI hate to sound outrageously pessimistic, but that is the bed we have made for ourselves. On the bright side, people will care more about friends and family...and value the truly important things in life once again. ...in a socialist America.',''); return false;">Quote</a></div> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Keith</title><link>http://seattlebubble.com/blog/2009/04/15/unemployment-reaches-record-levels-but-rate-of-increase-slows/#comment-70745</link> <dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 04:36:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://seattlebubble.com/blog/?p=5132#comment-70745</guid> <description>I&#039;m starting to worry about people getting wiped out by Bird Flu.  I wonder what That would do to the housing market?&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;70745&#039;,&#039;Keith&#039;,&#039;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;70745&#039;,&#039;Keith&#039;,&#039;I\&#039;m starting to worry about people getting wiped out by Bird Flu.  I wonder what That would do to the housing market?&#039;,&#039;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m starting to worry about people getting wiped out by Bird Flu.  I wonder what That would do to the housing market?<div
class="comment-remix-meta"><a
href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('70745','Keith',''); return false;">Reply</a> &#8211; <a
href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('70745','Keith','I\'m starting to worry about people getting wiped out by Bird Flu.  I wonder what That would do to the housing market?',''); return false;">Quote</a></div> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jonness</title><link>http://seattlebubble.com/blog/2009/04/15/unemployment-reaches-record-levels-but-rate-of-increase-slows/#comment-70744</link> <dc:creator>Jonness</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 03:31:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://seattlebubble.com/blog/?p=5132#comment-70744</guid> <description>&lt;b&gt;RE:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href=&#039;#comment-70730&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Amir @ 19&lt;/a&gt; -&quot;The jobless rate also rose in the Seattle metro area, to a seasonally adjusted 8.1 percent, from a revised 7.6 percent in February.&quot;I&#039;m guessing Tim&#039;s chart shows what analysts predicted prior to counting all the data. You are referring to the real-world rate of what happend when the real-world data was analyzed and counted. Clearly, you are correct, and the Seattle rate is not slowing nor is WA state as a whole. We are bleeding jobs at a rate not seen since the 80&#039;s, which was a back breaker. Looking at the data, it&#039;s my opinion that there is no slowdown in sight. If April turns out to be another month like last month, we&#039;ll be over 10% and set a 4-month streak not even seen in the 80&#039;s.The data is bad. It&#039;s really, really bad. I&#039;m surprised people are judging these numbers as favorable. They&#039;re terrible. I see absolutely nothing in this data that shows we&#039;ve even slightly slowed from the prior record tying months.&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;70744&#039;,&#039;Jonness&#039;,&#039;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;70744&#039;,&#039;Jonness&#039;,&#039;&lt;b&gt;RE:&lt;\/b&gt; &lt;a href=\&#039;#comment-70730\&#039; rel=\&quot;nofollow\&quot;&gt;Amir @ 19&lt;\/a&gt; - \r\n\r\n\&quot;The jobless rate also rose in the Seattle metro area, to a seasonally adjusted 8.1 percent, from a revised 7.6 percent in February.\&quot;\r\n\r\nI\&#039;m guessing Tim\&#039;s chart shows what analysts predicted prior to counting all the data. You are referring to the real-world rate of what happend when the real-world data was analyzed and counted. Clearly, you are correct, and the Seattle rate is not slowing nor is WA state as a whole. We are bleeding jobs at a rate not seen since the 80\&#039;s, which was a back breaker. Looking at the data, it\&#039;s my opinion that there is no slowdown in sight. If April turns out to be another month like last month, we\&#039;ll be over 10% and set a 4-month streak not even seen in the 80\&#039;s.\r\n\r\nThe data is bad. It\&#039;s really, really bad. I\&#039;m surprised people are judging these numbers as favorable. They\&#039;re terrible. I see absolutely nothing in this data that shows we\&#039;ve even slightly slowed from the prior record tying months.&#039;,&#039;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>RE:</b> <a
href='#comment-70730' rel="nofollow">Amir @ 19</a> &#8211;</p><p>&#8220;The jobless rate also rose in the Seattle metro area, to a seasonally adjusted 8.1 percent, from a revised 7.6 percent in February.&#8221;</p><p>I&#8217;m guessing Tim&#8217;s chart shows what analysts predicted prior to counting all the data. You are referring to the real-world rate of what happend when the real-world data was analyzed and counted. Clearly, you are correct, and the Seattle rate is not slowing nor is WA state as a whole. We are bleeding jobs at a rate not seen since the 80&#8217;s, which was a back breaker. Looking at the data, it&#8217;s my opinion that there is no slowdown in sight. If April turns out to be another month like last month, we&#8217;ll be over 10% and set a 4-month streak not even seen in the 80&#8217;s.</p><p>The data is bad. It&#8217;s really, really bad. I&#8217;m surprised people are judging these numbers as favorable. They&#8217;re terrible. I see absolutely nothing in this data that shows we&#8217;ve even slightly slowed from the prior record tying months.<div
class="comment-remix-meta"><a
href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('70744','Jonness',''); return false;">Reply</a> &#8211; <a
href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('70744','Jonness','&lt;b&gt;RE:&lt;\/b&gt; &lt;a href=\'#comment-70730\' rel=\&quot;nofollow\&quot;&gt;Amir @ 19&lt;\/a&gt; - \r\n\r\n\&quot;The jobless rate also rose in the Seattle metro area, to a seasonally adjusted 8.1 percent, from a revised 7.6 percent in February.\&quot;\r\n\r\nI\'m guessing Tim\'s chart shows what analysts predicted prior to counting all the data. You are referring to the real-world rate of what happend when the real-world data was analyzed and counted. Clearly, you are correct, and the Seattle rate is not slowing nor is WA state as a whole. We are bleeding jobs at a rate not seen since the 80\'s, which was a back breaker. Looking at the data, it\'s my opinion that there is no slowdown in sight. If April turns out to be another month like last month, we\'ll be over 10% and set a 4-month streak not even seen in the 80\'s.\r\n\r\nThe data is bad. It\'s really, really bad. I\'m surprised people are judging these numbers as favorable. They\'re terrible. I see absolutely nothing in this data that shows we\'ve even slightly slowed from the prior record tying months.',''); return false;">Quote</a></div> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jonness</title><link>http://seattlebubble.com/blog/2009/04/15/unemployment-reaches-record-levels-but-rate-of-increase-slows/#comment-70743</link> <dc:creator>Jonness</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 02:59:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://seattlebubble.com/blog/?p=5132#comment-70743</guid> <description></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Could this be the first sign that things are starting to level off&#8221;</p><p>WA dropped 9/10&#8217;s of a point in March after February&#8217;s adjustment. This is in line with the massive bleeding We&#8217;ve been seeing all along.</p><p>Unemployment in OR is 12.1% matching it&#8217;s record peak set in the 80&#8217;s. WA topped out at 12.2% in 1982, and we are steadily heading back to that point at the rate of just under a 1% increase per month.</p><p>Month&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;WA&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;OR&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;National<br
/> Oct08&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;5.9&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.7.2&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;6.6<br
/> Nov08&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;6.1&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.7.8&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;6.8<br
/> Dec08&#8230;&#8230; ..6.5&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.8.3&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;7.2<br
/> Jan09&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;7.8&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.9.8&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;7.6<br
/> Feb09&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;8.4&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;10.8&#8230;&#8230;..8.1<br
/> Mar 09&#8230;&#8230;..9.2&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;12.1&#8230;&#8230;..8.5</p><p>WA job losses are not slowing down.</p><p>&#8220;Washingtonâ€™s seasonally adjusted unemployment rate increased to 9.2 percent in March 2009, up from Februaryâ€™s revised rate of 8.3 percent, according to the state Employment Security Department.&#8221;<div
class="comment-remix-meta"><a
href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('70743','Jonness',''); return false;">Reply</a> &#8211; <a
href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('70743','Jonness','\&quot;Could this be the first sign that things are starting to level off\&quot;\r\n\r\nWA dropped 9\/10\'s of a point in March after February\'s adjustment. This is in line with the massive bleeding We\'ve been seeing all along.\r\n\r\nUnemployment in OR is 12.1% matching it\'s record peak set in the 80\'s. WA topped out at 12.2% in 1982, and we are steadily heading back to that point at the rate of just under a 1% increase per month.\r\n\r\nMonth.........WA.........OR.........National\r\nOct08.........5.9..........7.2.........6.6\r\nNov08.........6.1..........7.8.........6.8\r\nDec08...... ..6.5..........8.3.........7.2\r\nJan09.........7.8..........9.8.........7.6\r\nFeb09.........8.4.........10.8........8.1\r\nMar 09........9.2.........12.1........8.5\r\n\r\nWA job losses are not slowing down. \r\n\r\n\&quot;Washington&acirc;€™s seasonally adjusted unemployment rate increased to 9.2 percent in March 2009, up from February&acirc;€™s revised rate of 8.3 percent, according to the state Employment Security Department.\&quot;',''); return false;">Quote</a></div> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: pfft</title><link>http://seattlebubble.com/blog/2009/04/15/unemployment-reaches-record-levels-but-rate-of-increase-slows/#comment-70742</link> <dc:creator>pfft</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 02:28:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://seattlebubble.com/blog/?p=5132#comment-70742</guid> <description>&quot;the economy has usually turned around and is growing again.&quot;I say to that though, who cares about GDP figures if people don&#039;t have jobs?  for me the economy is about people not about GDP figures.NOTE: this post is in know way meant to disparage the awesomemess of &quot;the tim.&quot;&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;70742&#039;,&#039;pfft&#039;,&#039;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;70742&#039;,&#039;pfft&#039;,&#039;\&quot;the economy has usually turned around and is growing again.\&quot;\r\n\r\nI say to that though, who cares about GDP figures if people don\&#039;t have jobs?  for me the economy is about people not about GDP figures.\r\n\r\nNOTE: this post is in know way meant to disparage the awesomemess of \&quot;the tim.\&quot;&#039;,&#039;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;the economy has usually turned around and is growing again.&#8221;</p><p>I say to that though, who cares about GDP figures if people don&#8217;t have jobs?  for me the economy is about people not about GDP figures.</p><p>NOTE: this post is in know way meant to disparage the awesomemess of &#8220;the tim.&#8221;<div
class="comment-remix-meta"><a
href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('70742','pfft',''); return false;">Reply</a> &#8211; <a
href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('70742','pfft','\&quot;the economy has usually turned around and is growing again.\&quot;\r\n\r\nI say to that though, who cares about GDP figures if people don\'t have jobs?  for me the economy is about people not about GDP figures.\r\n\r\nNOTE: this post is in know way meant to disparage the awesomemess of \&quot;the tim.\&quot;',''); return false;">Quote</a></div> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jonnny</title><link>http://seattlebubble.com/blog/2009/04/15/unemployment-reaches-record-levels-but-rate-of-increase-slows/#comment-70736</link> <dc:creator>Jonnny</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 01:06:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://seattlebubble.com/blog/?p=5132#comment-70736</guid> <description>Yeah, yeah. But how does this compare with the 80&#039;s? The 70&#039;s?&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;70736&#039;,&#039;Jonnny&#039;,&#039;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;70736&#039;,&#039;Jonnny&#039;,&#039;Yeah, yeah. But how does this compare with the 80\&#039;s? The 70\&#039;s?&#039;,&#039;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, yeah. But how does this compare with the 80&#8217;s? The 70&#8217;s?<div
class="comment-remix-meta"><a
href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('70736','Jonnny',''); return false;">Reply</a> &#8211; <a
href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('70736','Jonnny','Yeah, yeah. But how does this compare with the 80\'s? The 70\'s?',''); return false;">Quote</a></div> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David Losh</title><link>http://seattlebubble.com/blog/2009/04/15/unemployment-reaches-record-levels-but-rate-of-increase-slows/#comment-70735</link> <dc:creator>David Losh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:57:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://seattlebubble.com/blog/?p=5132#comment-70735</guid> <description>I belong to a group called biznik at www.biznik.comThere is an article there that i will try to link here:
http://biznik.com/articles/why-entrepreneurs-rule-the-worldLong story short it talks about how there used to be small business everywhere and that the industrial revolution made more employees than employers.I see a shift coming. How many of you are really going to trust your employer to know what they are doing? Why are people shovelling money into banks that just nickle and dime you to death? The stock market is a joke if you really consider that rumor, or good news boosts the market place more than solid economic realities. Am I really reading that profit projections are the basis of good news? How about profits in the first quarter after write downs in the last quarter?I see a shift coming from a global market wary of feel good economics.&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;70735&#039;,&#039;David Losh&#039;,&#039;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;70735&#039;,&#039;David Losh&#039;,&#039;I belong to a group called biznik at www.biznik.com\r\n\r\nThere is an article there that i will try to link here:\r\nhttp:\/\/biznik.com\/articles\/why-entrepreneurs-rule-the-world\r\n\r\nLong story short it talks about how there used to be small business everywhere and that the industrial revolution made more employees than employers.\r\n\r\nI see a shift coming. How many of you are really going to trust your employer to know what they are doing? Why are people shovelling money into banks that just nickle and dime you to death? The stock market is a joke if you really consider that rumor, or good news boosts the market place more than solid economic realities. Am I really reading that profit projections are the basis of good news? How about profits in the first quarter after write downs in the last quarter? \r\n\r\nI see a shift coming from a global market wary of feel good economics.&#039;,&#039;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I belong to a group called biznik at <a
href="http://www.biznik.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.biznik.com</a></p><p>There is an article there that i will try to link here:<br
/> <a
href="http://biznik.com/articles/why-entrepreneurs-rule-the-world" rel="nofollow">http://biznik.com/articles/why-entrepreneurs-rule-the-world</a></p><p>Long story short it talks about how there used to be small business everywhere and that the industrial revolution made more employees than employers.</p><p>I see a shift coming. How many of you are really going to trust your employer to know what they are doing? Why are people shovelling money into banks that just nickle and dime you to death? The stock market is a joke if you really consider that rumor, or good news boosts the market place more than solid economic realities. Am I really reading that profit projections are the basis of good news? How about profits in the first quarter after write downs in the last quarter?</p><p>I see a shift coming from a global market wary of feel good economics.<div
class="comment-remix-meta"><a
href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('70735','David Losh',''); return false;">Reply</a> &#8211; <a
href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('70735','David Losh','I belong to a group called biznik at <a href="http://www.biznik.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.biznik.com</a>\r\n\r\nThere is an article there that i will try to link here:\r\nhttp:\/\/biznik.com\/articles\/why-entrepreneurs-rule-the-world\r\n\r\nLong story short it talks about how there used to be small business everywhere and that the industrial revolution made more employees than employers.\r\n\r\nI see a shift coming. How many of you are really going to trust your employer to know what they are doing? Why are people shovelling money into banks that just nickle and dime you to death? The stock market is a joke if you really consider that rumor, or good news boosts the market place more than solid economic realities. Am I really reading that profit projections are the basis of good news? How about profits in the first quarter after write downs in the last quarter? \r\n\r\nI see a shift coming from a global market wary of feel good economics.&#8217;,&#8221;); return false;&#8221;>Quote</div> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Scotsman</title><link>http://seattlebubble.com/blog/2009/04/15/unemployment-reaches-record-levels-but-rate-of-increase-slows/#comment-70734</link> <dc:creator>Scotsman</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:40:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://seattlebubble.com/blog/?p=5132#comment-70734</guid> <description>&lt;b&gt;RE:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href=&#039;#comment-70729&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Slumlord @ 18&lt;/a&gt; -Agreed that government investment is better than just more spending, but both pale in comparison to private investment, as a higher percentage of the dollar total for government investment goes to non productive administration.  The government must first collect the money (taxes) and then decide how to administer and distribute the collected funds.  All entail non productive administrative costs.If the government really wanted to get the economy going, it would cut taxes.  Tax cuts put money in both consumer and corporate pockets where it can be immediately spent on a wide variety of goods and services, as well as invested in projects with potential future returns.  It is one of the great ironies of our age that although it is well proven that tax cuts lead to greater revenue and more productive investment, our political structure and common understanding emphasize just the opposite.  I firmly believe the current administration is much more interested in expanding government power and dependency than it is in curring the economy&#039;s ills.  Unfortunately, they chose to make their move (or more accurately got the opportunity) too late in the current cycle.  The economy, and the political strategies of the current office holders are both doomed to fail for reasons beyond their control.&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;70734&#039;,&#039;Scotsman&#039;,&#039;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;70734&#039;,&#039;Scotsman&#039;,&#039;&lt;b&gt;RE:&lt;\/b&gt; &lt;a href=\&#039;#comment-70729\&#039; rel=\&quot;nofollow\&quot;&gt;Slumlord @ 18&lt;\/a&gt; - \r\n\r\nAgreed that government investment is better than just more spending, but both pale in comparison to private investment, as a higher percentage of the dollar total for government investment goes to non productive administration.  The government must first collect the money (taxes) and then decide how to administer and distribute the collected funds.  All entail non productive administrative costs.\r\n\r\nIf the government really wanted to get the economy going, it would cut taxes.  Tax cuts put money in both consumer and corporate pockets where it can be immediately spent on a wide variety of goods and services, as well as invested in projects with potential future returns.  It is one of the great ironies of our age that although it is well proven that tax cuts lead to greater revenue and more productive investment, our political structure and common understanding emphasize just the opposite.  I firmly believe the current administration is much more interested in expanding government power and dependency than it is in curring the economy\&#039;s ills.  Unfortunately, they chose to make their move (or more accurately got the opportunity) too late in the current cycle.  The economy, and the political strategies of the current office holders are both doomed to fail for reasons beyond their control.&#039;,&#039;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>RE:</b> <a
href='#comment-70729' rel="nofollow">Slumlord @ 18</a> &#8211;</p><p>Agreed that government investment is better than just more spending, but both pale in comparison to private investment, as a higher percentage of the dollar total for government investment goes to non productive administration.  The government must first collect the money (taxes) and then decide how to administer and distribute the collected funds.  All entail non productive administrative costs.</p><p>If the government really wanted to get the economy going, it would cut taxes.  Tax cuts put money in both consumer and corporate pockets where it can be immediately spent on a wide variety of goods and services, as well as invested in projects with potential future returns.  It is one of the great ironies of our age that although it is well proven that tax cuts lead to greater revenue and more productive investment, our political structure and common understanding emphasize just the opposite.  I firmly believe the current administration is much more interested in expanding government power and dependency than it is in curring the economy&#8217;s ills.  Unfortunately, they chose to make their move (or more accurately got the opportunity) too late in the current cycle.  The economy, and the political strategies of the current office holders are both doomed to fail for reasons beyond their control.<div
class="comment-remix-meta"><a
href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('70734','Scotsman',''); return false;">Reply</a> &#8211; <a
href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('70734','Scotsman','&lt;b&gt;RE:&lt;\/b&gt; &lt;a href=\'#comment-70729\' rel=\&quot;nofollow\&quot;&gt;Slumlord @ 18&lt;\/a&gt; - \r\n\r\nAgreed that government investment is better than just more spending, but both pale in comparison to private investment, as a higher percentage of the dollar total for government investment goes to non productive administration.  The government must first collect the money (taxes) and then decide how to administer and distribute the collected funds.  All entail non productive administrative costs.\r\n\r\nIf the government really wanted to get the economy going, it would cut taxes.  Tax cuts put money in both consumer and corporate pockets where it can be immediately spent on a wide variety of goods and services, as well as invested in projects with potential future returns.  It is one of the great ironies of our age that although it is well proven that tax cuts lead to greater revenue and more productive investment, our political structure and common understanding emphasize just the opposite.  I firmly believe the current administration is much more interested in expanding government power and dependency than it is in curring the economy\'s ills.  Unfortunately, they chose to make their move (or more accurately got the opportunity) too late in the current cycle.  The economy, and the political strategies of the current office holders are both doomed to fail for reasons beyond their control.',''); return false;">Quote</a></div> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Graham</title><link>http://seattlebubble.com/blog/2009/04/15/unemployment-reaches-record-levels-but-rate-of-increase-slows/#comment-70732</link> <dc:creator>Graham</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:02:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://seattlebubble.com/blog/?p=5132#comment-70732</guid> <description>&lt;b&gt;RE:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href=&#039;#comment-70719&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Sniglet @ 12&lt;/a&gt; -And what do you base your projections on?&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;70732&#039;,&#039;Graham&#039;,&#039;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;70732&#039;,&#039;Graham&#039;,&#039;&lt;b&gt;RE:&lt;\/b&gt; &lt;a href=\&#039;#comment-70719\&#039; rel=\&quot;nofollow\&quot;&gt;Sniglet @ 12&lt;\/a&gt; - \r\n\r\nAnd what do you base your projections on?&#039;,&#039;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>RE:</b> <a
href='#comment-70719' rel="nofollow">Sniglet @ 12</a> &#8211;</p><p>And what do you base your projections on?<div
class="comment-remix-meta"><a
href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('70732','Graham',''); return false;">Reply</a> &#8211; <a
href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('70732','Graham','&lt;b&gt;RE:&lt;\/b&gt; &lt;a href=\'#comment-70719\' rel=\&quot;nofollow\&quot;&gt;Sniglet @ 12&lt;\/a&gt; - \r\n\r\nAnd what do you base your projections on?',''); return false;">Quote</a></div> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Amir</title><link>http://seattlebubble.com/blog/2009/04/15/unemployment-reaches-record-levels-but-rate-of-increase-slows/#comment-70730</link> <dc:creator>Amir</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 23:57:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://seattlebubble.com/blog/?p=5132#comment-70730</guid> <description></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;In contrast, from February to March, the Seattle areaâ€™s unemployment rate increased by only 0.1 percentage points.&#8221;</p><p>Huh? The article says it went up from 7.6% to 8.1% &#8230; which is actually worse than the national increase.<div
class="comment-remix-meta"><a
href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('70730','Amir',''); return false;">Reply</a> &#8211; <a
href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('70730','Amir','\&quot;In contrast, from February to March, the Seattle area&acirc;€™s unemployment rate increased by only 0.1 percentage points.\&quot;\r\n\r\nHuh? The article says it went up from 7.6% to 8.1% ... which is actually worse than the national increase.',''); return false;">Quote</a></div> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Slumlord</title><link>http://seattlebubble.com/blog/2009/04/15/unemployment-reaches-record-levels-but-rate-of-increase-slows/#comment-70729</link> <dc:creator>Slumlord</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 23:47:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://seattlebubble.com/blog/?p=5132#comment-70729</guid> <description></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>RE:</b> <a
href='#comment-70726' rel="nofollow">Scotsman @ 17</a> &#8211;</p><p>Thank you for those links to the charts.  The first one was new to me but makes perfect sense and the second is very important for understanding where we are today.</p><p>I hope Iâ€™m not parsing words too much by agreeing that government spending will not save us but I also think that government investment can help.  The distinction in my mind is that money is gone once it is spent: whereas with investment you are getting some kind of productive asset in return.</p><p>To illustrate, the auto industry has capacity to build 18 million cars a year but is only selling 8 million, hence subsidies to GM brings zero long-term benefit.  There is too much capacity and some car companies need to shut down.  Alternatively, the billions spent on GM could have invested in building commuter rail.  This second choice would have reduced traffic and outflows of cash to the Middle East.   I think our leaders have chosen poorly, moreover, we let them do it.<div
class="comment-remix-meta"><a
href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('70729','Slumlord',''); return false;">Reply</a> &#8211; <a
href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('70729','Slumlord','&lt;b&gt;RE:&lt;\/b&gt; &lt;a href=\'#comment-70726\' rel=\&quot;nofollow\&quot;&gt;Scotsman @ 17&lt;\/a&gt; - \r\n\r\nThank you for those links to the charts.  The first one was new to me but makes perfect sense and the second is very important for understanding where we are today.\r\n\r\nI hope I&acirc;€™m not parsing words too much by agreeing that government spending will not save us but I also think that government investment can help.  The distinction in my mind is that money is gone once it is spent: whereas with investment you are getting some kind of productive asset in return.\r\n\r\nTo illustrate, the auto industry has capacity to build 18 million cars a year but is only selling 8 million, hence subsidies to GM brings zero long-term benefit.  There is too much capacity and some car companies need to shut down.  Alternatively, the billions spent on GM could have invested in building commuter rail.  This second choice would have reduced traffic and outflows of cash to the Middle East.   I think our leaders have chosen poorly, moreover, we let them do it.',''); return false;">Quote</a></div> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Scotsman</title><link>http://seattlebubble.com/blog/2009/04/15/unemployment-reaches-record-levels-but-rate-of-increase-slows/#comment-70726</link> <dc:creator>Scotsman</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 22:44:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://seattlebubble.com/blog/?p=5132#comment-70726</guid> <description>This chart has been around for a while too, and shows why unemployment will not be dropping anytime soon.  In short, the consumer, 70% of GNP, needs to start buying again before demand can push up production and cut into unemployment.  As the chart shows, the consumer segment of the economy is dealing with record debt.  It isn&#039;t that the money isn&#039;t available to lend, and never really has been.  It&#039;s that the consumer is maxed out and needs to recover before making significant new purchases.  Unemployment will continue to climb, and any recovery is well off in the future, and is likely to be slow in gaining momentum.http://paul.kedrosky.com/WindowsLiveWriter/U.S.TotalCreditMarketDebtbySector1929200_93C7/debt-trend-breakdown_2.jpgP.S.-  If you think government spending is going to save us, see my post above this one and check out that graph again...&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;70726&#039;,&#039;Scotsman&#039;,&#039;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;70726&#039;,&#039;Scotsman&#039;,&#039;This chart has been around for a while too, and shows why unemployment will not be dropping anytime soon.  In short, the consumer, 70% of GNP, needs to start buying again before demand can push up production and cut into unemployment.  As the chart shows, the consumer segment of the economy is dealing with record debt.  It isn\&#039;t that the money isn\&#039;t available to lend, and never really has been.  It\&#039;s that the consumer is maxed out and needs to recover before making significant new purchases.  Unemployment will continue to climb, and any recovery is well off in the future, and is likely to be slow in gaining momentum.\r\n\r\nhttp:\/\/paul.kedrosky.com\/WindowsLiveWriter\/U.S.TotalCreditMarketDebtbySector1929200_93C7\/debt-trend-breakdown_2.jpg\r\n\r\nP.S.-  If you think government spending is going to save us, see my post above this one and check out that graph again...&#039;,&#039;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This chart has been around for a while too, and shows why unemployment will not be dropping anytime soon.  In short, the consumer, 70% of GNP, needs to start buying again before demand can push up production and cut into unemployment.  As the chart shows, the consumer segment of the economy is dealing with record debt.  It isn&#8217;t that the money isn&#8217;t available to lend, and never really has been.  It&#8217;s that the consumer is maxed out and needs to recover before making significant new purchases.  Unemployment will continue to climb, and any recovery is well off in the future, and is likely to be slow in gaining momentum.</p><p><a
href="http://paul.kedrosky.com/WindowsLiveWriter/U.S.TotalCreditMarketDebtbySector1929200_93C7/debt-trend-breakdown_2.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://paul.kedrosky.com/WindowsLiveWriter/U.S.TotalCreditMarketDebtbySector1929200_93C7/debt-trend-breakdown_2.jpg</a></p><p>P.S.-  If you think government spending is going to save us, see my post above this one and check out that graph again&#8230;<div
class="comment-remix-meta"><a
href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('70726','Scotsman',''); return false;">Reply</a> &#8211; <a
href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('70726','Scotsman','This chart has been around for a while too, and shows why unemployment will not be dropping anytime soon.  In short, the consumer, 70% of GNP, needs to start buying again before demand can push up production and cut into unemployment.  As the chart shows, the consumer segment of the economy is dealing with record debt.  It isn\'t that the money isn\'t available to lend, and never really has been.  It\'s that the consumer is maxed out and needs to recover before making significant new purchases.  Unemployment will continue to climb, and any recovery is well off in the future, and is likely to be slow in gaining momentum.\r\n\r\nhttp:\/\/paul.kedrosky.com\/WindowsLiveWriter\/U.S.TotalCreditMarketDebtbySector1929200_93C7\/debt-trend-breakdown_2.jpg\r\n\r\nP.S.-  If you think government spending is going to save us, see my post above this one and check out that graph again...',''); return false;">Quote</a></div> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Scotsman</title><link>http://seattlebubble.com/blog/2009/04/15/unemployment-reaches-record-levels-but-rate-of-increase-slows/#comment-70725</link> <dc:creator>Scotsman</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 22:23:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://seattlebubble.com/blog/?p=5132#comment-70725</guid> <description>An effective expansion of the national debt from $9 trillion to $17 trillion by 2011.Social Security&#039;s cash flow will go negative by the end of this year, not 2011 as budgeted.$60 trillion in unfunded federal commitments over the next 25 years.Interest rates headed for zero, and so are the returns.  It&#039;s hard to see how a slowdown in the
unemployment numbers turns this whole mess around.http://market-ticker.org/uploads/debt-contribution.jpg&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;70725&#039;,&#039;Scotsman&#039;,&#039;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;70725&#039;,&#039;Scotsman&#039;,&#039;An effective expansion of the national debt from $9 trillion to $17 trillion by 2011.\r\n\r\nSocial Security\&#039;s cash flow will go negative by the end of this year, not 2011 as budgeted.\r\n\r\n$60 trillion in unfunded federal commitments over the next 25 years.\r\n\r\nInterest rates headed for zero, and so are the returns.  It\&#039;s hard to see how a slowdown in the\r\nunemployment numbers turns this whole mess around.\r\n\r\n\r\nhttp:\/\/market-ticker.org\/uploads\/debt-contribution.jpg&#039;,&#039;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An effective expansion of the national debt from $9 trillion to $17 trillion by 2011.</p><p>Social Security&#8217;s cash flow will go negative by the end of this year, not 2011 as budgeted.</p><p>$60 trillion in unfunded federal commitments over the next 25 years.</p><p>Interest rates headed for zero, and so are the returns.  It&#8217;s hard to see how a slowdown in the<br
/> unemployment numbers turns this whole mess around.</p><p><a
href="http://market-ticker.org/uploads/debt-contribution.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://market-ticker.org/uploads/debt-contribution.jpg</a><div
class="comment-remix-meta"><a
href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('70725','Scotsman',''); return false;">Reply</a> &#8211; <a
href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('70725','Scotsman','An effective expansion of the national debt from $9 trillion to $17 trillion by 2011.\r\n\r\nSocial Security\'s cash flow will go negative by the end of this year, not 2011 as budgeted.\r\n\r\n$60 trillion in unfunded federal commitments over the next 25 years.\r\n\r\nInterest rates headed for zero, and so are the returns.  It\'s hard to see how a slowdown in the\r\nunemployment numbers turns this whole mess around.\r\n\r\n\r\nhttp:\/\/market-ticker.org\/uploads\/debt-contribution.jpg',''); return false;">Quote</a></div> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: deejayoh</title><link>http://seattlebubble.com/blog/2009/04/15/unemployment-reaches-record-levels-but-rate-of-increase-slows/#comment-70722</link> <dc:creator>deejayoh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 22:04:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://seattlebubble.com/blog/?p=5132#comment-70722</guid> <description>Of the ~100k jobs lost in Washington in the last year - here is the breakdown by industry:Trade, Transportation and Utilities	-29%
Construction	-27%
Manufacturing	-22%
Professional and Business Services	-16%
Financial Activities	-9%
Leisure and Hosptiality	-4%
Natural Resources and Minng	-1%
Information	-1%
Other Services	0%
Government	5%
Education and Health Services	5%Top job loss industries are not too surprising:  Retail, Construction, and Manufacturing are over 3/4 of the total.&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;70722&#039;,&#039;deejayoh&#039;,&#039;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;70722&#039;,&#039;deejayoh&#039;,&#039;Of the ~100k jobs lost in Washington in the last year - here is the breakdown by industry:\r\n\r\n    Trade, Transportation and Utilities	-29%\r\n    Construction	-27%\r\n    Manufacturing	-22%\r\n    Professional and Business Services	-16%\r\n    Financial Activities	-9%\r\n    Leisure and Hosptiality	-4%\r\n    Natural Resources and Minng	-1%\r\n    Information	-1%\r\n    Other Services	0%\r\n    Government	5%\r\n    Education and Health Services	5%\r\n\r\nTop job loss industries are not too surprising:  Retail, Construction, and Manufacturing are over 3\/4 of the total.&#039;,&#039;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of the ~100k jobs lost in Washington in the last year &#8211; here is the breakdown by industry:</p><p> Trade, Transportation and Utilities	-29%<br
/> Construction	-27%<br
/> Manufacturing	-22%<br
/> Professional and Business Services	-16%<br
/> Financial Activities	-9%<br
/> Leisure and Hosptiality	-4%<br
/> Natural Resources and Minng	-1%<br
/> Information	-1%<br
/> Other Services	0%<br
/> Government	5%<br
/> Education and Health Services	5%</p><p>Top job loss industries are not too surprising:  Retail, Construction, and Manufacturing are over 3/4 of the total.<div
class="comment-remix-meta"><a
href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('70722','deejayoh',''); return false;">Reply</a> &#8211; <a
href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('70722','deejayoh','Of the ~100k jobs lost in Washington in the last year - here is the breakdown by industry:\r\n\r\n    Trade, Transportation and Utilities	-29%\r\n    Construction	-27%\r\n    Manufacturing	-22%\r\n    Professional and Business Services	-16%\r\n    Financial Activities	-9%\r\n    Leisure and Hosptiality	-4%\r\n    Natural Resources and Minng	-1%\r\n    Information	-1%\r\n    Other Services	0%\r\n    Government	5%\r\n    Education and Health Services	5%\r\n\r\nTop job loss industries are not too surprising:  Retail, Construction, and Manufacturing are over 3\/4 of the total.',''); return false;">Quote</a></div> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Slumlord</title><link>http://seattlebubble.com/blog/2009/04/15/unemployment-reaches-record-levels-but-rate-of-increase-slows/#comment-70721</link> <dc:creator>Slumlord</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 22:03:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://seattlebubble.com/blog/?p=5132#comment-70721</guid> <description>It does appear that the economy is stabilizing, but I doubt that it is the sign of an imminent return to growth.  If anything, it is as if we fell into an open elevator shaft after the Lehman bankruptcy and have landed on a downward escalator.  Our situation is improved, but we are still going in a negative direction.  Looking ahead, I see the escalator ride ending with another open shaft called GM.In my opinion, taking the short-term pain of a corporate bankruptcy is like a broken leg; it hurts like crazy but gets better soon.  Bailouts for insolvent companies are like treating a slow moving cancer; you get addicted to all kinds of medications with strange side effects and never get better.To anyone who has recently become one of the statistics on unemployment: Remember, you are not your job, you are not your house, and you are not the things you own.  You are a capable human being who is adaptive and resilient.  The economy may get worse, but the worst for you has already passed.&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;70721&#039;,&#039;Slumlord&#039;,&#039;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;70721&#039;,&#039;Slumlord&#039;,&#039;It does appear that the economy is stabilizing, but I doubt that it is the sign of an imminent return to growth.  If anything, it is as if we fell into an open elevator shaft after the Lehman bankruptcy and have landed on a downward escalator.  Our situation is improved, but we are still going in a negative direction.  Looking ahead, I see the escalator ride ending with another open shaft called GM.\r\n\r\nIn my opinion, taking the short-term pain of a corporate bankruptcy is like a broken leg; it hurts like crazy but gets better soon.  Bailouts for insolvent companies are like treating a slow moving cancer; you get addicted to all kinds of medications with strange side effects and never get better.\r\n\r\nTo anyone who has recently become one of the statistics on unemployment: Remember, you are not your job, you are not your house, and you are not the things you own.  You are a capable human being who is adaptive and resilient.  The economy may get worse, but the worst for you has already passed.&#039;,&#039;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It does appear that the economy is stabilizing, but I doubt that it is the sign of an imminent return to growth.  If anything, it is as if we fell into an open elevator shaft after the Lehman bankruptcy and have landed on a downward escalator.  Our situation is improved, but we are still going in a negative direction.  Looking ahead, I see the escalator ride ending with another open shaft called GM.</p><p>In my opinion, taking the short-term pain of a corporate bankruptcy is like a broken leg; it hurts like crazy but gets better soon.  Bailouts for insolvent companies are like treating a slow moving cancer; you get addicted to all kinds of medications with strange side effects and never get better.</p><p>To anyone who has recently become one of the statistics on unemployment: Remember, you are not your job, you are not your house, and you are not the things you own.  You are a capable human being who is adaptive and resilient.  The economy may get worse, but the worst for you has already passed.<div
class="comment-remix-meta"><a
href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('70721','Slumlord',''); return false;">Reply</a> &#8211; <a
href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('70721','Slumlord','It does appear that the economy is stabilizing, but I doubt that it is the sign of an imminent return to growth.  If anything, it is as if we fell into an open elevator shaft after the Lehman bankruptcy and have landed on a downward escalator.  Our situation is improved, but we are still going in a negative direction.  Looking ahead, I see the escalator ride ending with another open shaft called GM.\r\n\r\nIn my opinion, taking the short-term pain of a corporate bankruptcy is like a broken leg; it hurts like crazy but gets better soon.  Bailouts for insolvent companies are like treating a slow moving cancer; you get addicted to all kinds of medications with strange side effects and never get better.\r\n\r\nTo anyone who has recently become one of the statistics on unemployment: Remember, you are not your job, you are not your house, and you are not the things you own.  You are a capable human being who is adaptive and resilient.  The economy may get worse, but the worst for you has already passed.',''); return false;">Quote</a></div> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: NimChimpsky</title><link>http://seattlebubble.com/blog/2009/04/15/unemployment-reaches-record-levels-but-rate-of-increase-slows/#comment-70720</link> <dc:creator>NimChimpsky</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 21:47:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://seattlebubble.com/blog/?p=5132#comment-70720</guid> <description>While UW will be cutting 1,000  jobs due to the legislative budget cuts, it will likely be hiring a significant number over the next year or so as a result of ARRA money in the form of research grants through NIH and NSF.  The shift would be from jobs that support general operations and academics to jobs that specifically support research,. The offset could be a decent amount. Based on previous percentages of federal grant money received by the UW, the estimate of ARRA research grant money to the UW somewhere around $300 mil. All of this money comes with unprecedented reporting requirements and projects have to be completed/money has to be spent within 2 years. I would predict that in the short term, more staff will have to be hired than normally would for research studies in order to meet both the 2 year deadline and the reporting requirements.&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;70720&#039;,&#039;NimChimpsky&#039;,&#039;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;70720&#039;,&#039;NimChimpsky&#039;,&#039;While UW will be cutting 1,000  jobs due to the legislative budget cuts, it will likely be hiring a significant number over the next year or so as a result of ARRA money in the form of research grants through NIH and NSF.  The shift would be from jobs that support general operations and academics to jobs that specifically support research,. The offset could be a decent amount. Based on previous percentages of federal grant money received by the UW, the estimate of ARRA research grant money to the UW somewhere around $300 mil. All of this money comes with unprecedented reporting requirements and projects have to be completed\/money has to be spent within 2 years. I would predict that in the short term, more staff will have to be hired than normally would for research studies in order to meet both the 2 year deadline and the reporting requirements.&#039;,&#039;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While UW will be cutting 1,000  jobs due to the legislative budget cuts, it will likely be hiring a significant number over the next year or so as a result of ARRA money in the form of research grants through NIH and NSF.  The shift would be from jobs that support general operations and academics to jobs that specifically support research,. The offset could be a decent amount. Based on previous percentages of federal grant money received by the UW, the estimate of ARRA research grant money to the UW somewhere around $300 mil. All of this money comes with unprecedented reporting requirements and projects have to be completed/money has to be spent within 2 years. I would predict that in the short term, more staff will have to be hired than normally would for research studies in order to meet both the 2 year deadline and the reporting requirements.<div
class="comment-remix-meta"><a
href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('70720','NimChimpsky',''); return false;">Reply</a> &#8211; <a
href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('70720','NimChimpsky','While UW will be cutting 1,000  jobs due to the legislative budget cuts, it will likely be hiring a significant number over the next year or so as a result of ARRA money in the form of research grants through NIH and NSF.  The shift would be from jobs that support general operations and academics to jobs that specifically support research,. The offset could be a decent amount. Based on previous percentages of federal grant money received by the UW, the estimate of ARRA research grant money to the UW somewhere around $300 mil. All of this money comes with unprecedented reporting requirements and projects have to be completed\/money has to be spent within 2 years. I would predict that in the short term, more staff will have to be hired than normally would for research studies in order to meet both the 2 year deadline and the reporting requirements.',''); return false;">Quote</a></div> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sniglet</title><link>http://seattlebubble.com/blog/2009/04/15/unemployment-reaches-record-levels-but-rate-of-increase-slows/#comment-70719</link> <dc:creator>Sniglet</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 20:19:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://seattlebubble.com/blog/?p=5132#comment-70719</guid> <description>A few months of data don&#039;t make a &quot;trend&quot;. As I have long posited, there will likely be a significant recovery in both stocks and the broader economy through the spring and summer (e.g. the Dow could make it back to the 10,000 range again). The statistics will likely look rosier and rosier every month. Unemployment filings could even drop significantly for a few months. Real estate sales might spike.Unfortunately, I believe that the recovery will be short-lived, and come the winter, and early 2010, we will see all the gains lost, and begin to explore even deeper troughs for everything from stocks to real-estate and unemployment.In the meantime (i.e. while the recovery lasts), there will be &lt;i&gt;plenty&lt;/i&gt; of people who proclaim the &quot;bottom&quot; has been reached, and that now is the time to jump back into real-estate before prices go to the moon again...&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;70719&#039;,&#039;Sniglet&#039;,&#039;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;70719&#039;,&#039;Sniglet&#039;,&#039;A few months of data don\&#039;t make a \&quot;trend\&quot;. As I have long posited, there will likely be a significant recovery in both stocks and the broader economy through the spring and summer (e.g. the Dow could make it back to the 10,000 range again). The statistics will likely look rosier and rosier every month. Unemployment filings could even drop significantly for a few months. Real estate sales might spike.\r\n\r\nUnfortunately, I believe that the recovery will be short-lived, and come the winter, and early 2010, we will see all the gains lost, and begin to explore even deeper troughs for everything from stocks to real-estate and unemployment.\r\n\r\nIn the meantime (i.e. while the recovery lasts), there will be &lt;i&gt;plenty&lt;\/i&gt; of people who proclaim the \&quot;bottom\&quot; has been reached, and that now is the time to jump back into real-estate before prices go to the moon again...&#039;,&#039;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few months of data don&#8217;t make a &#8220;trend&#8221;. As I have long posited, there will likely be a significant recovery in both stocks and the broader economy through the spring and summer (e.g. the Dow could make it back to the 10,000 range again). The statistics will likely look rosier and rosier every month. Unemployment filings could even drop significantly for a few months. Real estate sales might spike.</p><p>Unfortunately, I believe that the recovery will be short-lived, and come the winter, and early 2010, we will see all the gains lost, and begin to explore even deeper troughs for everything from stocks to real-estate and unemployment.</p><p>In the meantime (i.e. while the recovery lasts), there will be <i>plenty</i> of people who proclaim the &#8220;bottom&#8221; has been reached, and that now is the time to jump back into real-estate before prices go to the moon again&#8230;<div
class="comment-remix-meta"><a
href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('70719','Sniglet',''); return false;">Reply</a> &#8211; <a
href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('70719','Sniglet','A few months of data don\'t make a \&quot;trend\&quot;. As I have long posited, there will likely be a significant recovery in both stocks and the broader economy through the spring and summer (e.g. the Dow could make it back to the 10,000 range again). The statistics will likely look rosier and rosier every month. Unemployment filings could even drop significantly for a few months. Real estate sales might spike.\r\n\r\nUnfortunately, I believe that the recovery will be short-lived, and come the winter, and early 2010, we will see all the gains lost, and begin to explore even deeper troughs for everything from stocks to real-estate and unemployment.\r\n\r\nIn the meantime (i.e. while the recovery lasts), there will be &lt;i&gt;plenty&lt;\/i&gt; of people who proclaim the \&quot;bottom\&quot; has been reached, and that now is the time to jump back into real-estate before prices go to the moon again...',''); return false;">Quote</a></div> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: PhinneyDawg</title><link>http://seattlebubble.com/blog/2009/04/15/unemployment-reaches-record-levels-but-rate-of-increase-slows/#comment-70718</link> <dc:creator>PhinneyDawg</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 19:52:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://seattlebubble.com/blog/?p=5132#comment-70718</guid> <description>Considering how many people work at UW, and how much they are cutting the budget (at least 30%) 1000 jobs isn&#039;t that much in total (but very distressing to everyone who works at the university).And, 500 of those jobs may just be jobs that go unfilled, so its not as bad as the initial news.I imagine that this economy will be weak for years because of the current recession. There&#039;s only so much consumers can cut spending and I think people have found very few places left to do it in their budget (and still live the lifestyle they can tolerate).At the same time businesses are downsizing and becoming ultra-efficient to absorb the lack of consumer spending. At some point we&#039;ll hit a bottom and begin to grow very slowly, in my opinion. There&#039;s always the chance that the society falls apart and we all turn into savage beasts, but there are far better chances that we go through a prolongated recession and come out okay in 5-7 years.&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;70718&#039;,&#039;PhinneyDawg&#039;,&#039;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;70718&#039;,&#039;PhinneyDawg&#039;,&#039;Considering how many people work at UW, and how much they are cutting the budget (at least 30%) 1000 jobs isn\&#039;t that much in total (but very distressing to everyone who works at the university).\r\n\r\nAnd, 500 of those jobs may just be jobs that go unfilled, so its not as bad as the initial news.\r\n\r\nI imagine that this economy will be weak for years because of the current recession. There\&#039;s only so much consumers can cut spending and I think people have found very few places left to do it in their budget (and still live the lifestyle they can tolerate). \r\n\r\nAt the same time businesses are downsizing and becoming ultra-efficient to absorb the lack of consumer spending. At some point we\&#039;ll hit a bottom and begin to grow very slowly, in my opinion. There\&#039;s always the chance that the society falls apart and we all turn into savage beasts, but there are far better chances that we go through a prolongated recession and come out okay in 5-7 years.&#039;,&#039;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Considering how many people work at UW, and how much they are cutting the budget (at least 30%) 1000 jobs isn&#8217;t that much in total (but very distressing to everyone who works at the university).</p><p>And, 500 of those jobs may just be jobs that go unfilled, so its not as bad as the initial news.</p><p>I imagine that this economy will be weak for years because of the current recession. There&#8217;s only so much consumers can cut spending and I think people have found very few places left to do it in their budget (and still live the lifestyle they can tolerate).</p><p>At the same time businesses are downsizing and becoming ultra-efficient to absorb the lack of consumer spending. At some point we&#8217;ll hit a bottom and begin to grow very slowly, in my opinion. There&#8217;s always the chance that the society falls apart and we all turn into savage beasts, but there are far better chances that we go through a prolongated recession and come out okay in 5-7 years.<div
class="comment-remix-meta"><a
href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('70718','PhinneyDawg',''); return false;">Reply</a> &#8211; <a
href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('70718','PhinneyDawg','Considering how many people work at UW, and how much they are cutting the budget (at least 30%) 1000 jobs isn\'t that much in total (but very distressing to everyone who works at the university).\r\n\r\nAnd, 500 of those jobs may just be jobs that go unfilled, so its not as bad as the initial news.\r\n\r\nI imagine that this economy will be weak for years because of the current recession. There\'s only so much consumers can cut spending and I think people have found very few places left to do it in their budget (and still live the lifestyle they can tolerate). \r\n\r\nAt the same time businesses are downsizing and becoming ultra-efficient to absorb the lack of consumer spending. At some point we\'ll hit a bottom and begin to grow very slowly, in my opinion. There\'s always the chance that the society falls apart and we all turn into savage beasts, but there are far better chances that we go through a prolongated recession and come out okay in 5-7 years.',''); return false;">Quote</a></div> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Plastic Bags</title><link>http://seattlebubble.com/blog/2009/04/15/unemployment-reaches-record-levels-but-rate-of-increase-slows/#comment-70717</link> <dc:creator>Plastic Bags</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 19:15:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://seattlebubble.com/blog/?p=5132#comment-70717</guid> <description>I don&#039;t think we&#039;re in the clear yet.  Just on the news a few mins ago I heard Russel Investments (Tacoma) is laying off 400 and UW is laying off 1000.&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;70717&#039;,&#039;Plastic Bags&#039;,&#039;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;70717&#039;,&#039;Plastic Bags&#039;,&#039;I don\&#039;t think we\&#039;re in the clear yet.  Just on the news a few mins ago I heard Russel Investments (Tacoma) is laying off 400 and UW is laying off 1000.&#039;,&#039;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think we&#8217;re in the clear yet.  Just on the news a few mins ago I heard Russel Investments (Tacoma) is laying off 400 and UW is laying off 1000.<div
class="comment-remix-meta"><a
href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('70717','Plastic Bags',''); return false;">Reply</a> &#8211; <a
href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('70717','Plastic Bags','I don\'t think we\'re in the clear yet.  Just on the news a few mins ago I heard Russel Investments (Tacoma) is laying off 400 and UW is laying off 1000.',''); return false;">Quote</a></div> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: softwarengineer</title><link>http://seattlebubble.com/blog/2009/04/15/unemployment-reaches-record-levels-but-rate-of-increase-slows/#comment-70716</link> <dc:creator>softwarengineer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 18:59:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://seattlebubble.com/blog/?p=5132#comment-70716</guid> <description>THE ECONOMY HAS LOST ALL ITS BLOOD AND THE BLEEDING HAS SUBSIDED; SO WHAT?If you&#039;re looking for &quot;good news&quot; on the economy, re: unemployment, you need not look no farther than The Tim&#039;s horrifying spike on his chart.You will hear later today that the banks all passed the phony [Dr Roubini states] government stress tests, with phony unemployment rates, etc inserted in the math S./W. Lipstick on the pig, that doesn&#039;t mean a thing.Read the Beige Book account of the economy through early April, as is states in part:&quot;...Almost all sectors were contracting or slowing in almost all regions, the Beige Books said. Manufacturing weakened, retail spending was &quot;sluggish,&quot; the housing markets were &quot;weak&quot; and banks reported rising delinquencies and deteriorating loan quality....&quot;The rest of the URL:http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/us-economy-still-contracting-everywhere/story.aspx?guid=%7B33DD5B9D%2D0C0E%2D4E4A%2D8D68%2D7D2ECE8687FE%7D&amp;siteid=bnbhP.S., Dr Roubini allegedly turned down a cabinet job with Obama; because he likes being as clear, pragmatic and honest as he can [even he uses lipstick on the pig too], as an almost free man on his RGE website.&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;70716&#039;,&#039;softwarengineer&#039;,&#039;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;70716&#039;,&#039;softwarengineer&#039;,&#039;THE ECONOMY HAS LOST ALL ITS BLOOD AND THE BLEEDING HAS SUBSIDED; SO WHAT?\r\n\r\nIf you\&#039;re looking for \&quot;good news\&quot; on the economy, re: unemployment, you need not look no farther than The Tim\&#039;s horrifying spike on his chart. \r\n\r\nYou will hear later today that the banks all passed the phony &#91;Dr Roubini states&#93; government stress tests, with phony unemployment rates, etc inserted in the math S.\/W. Lipstick on the pig, that doesn\&#039;t mean a thing.\r\n\r\nRead the Beige Book account of the economy through early April, as is states in part:\r\n\r\n\&quot;...Almost all sectors were contracting or slowing in almost all regions, the Beige Books said. Manufacturing weakened, retail spending was \&quot;sluggish,\&quot; the housing markets were \&quot;weak\&quot; and banks reported rising delinquencies and deteriorating loan quality....\&quot;\r\n\r\nThe rest of the URL:\r\n\r\nhttp:\/\/www.marketwatch.com\/news\/story\/us-economy-still-contracting-everywhere\/story.aspx?guid=%7B33DD5B9D%2D0C0E%2D4E4A%2D8D68%2D7D2ECE8687FE%7D&amp;siteid=bnbh\r\n\r\nP.S., Dr Roubini allegedly turned down a cabinet job with Obama; because he likes being as clear, pragmatic and honest as he can &#91;even he uses lipstick on the pig too&#93;, as an almost free man on his RGE website.&#039;,&#039;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THE ECONOMY HAS LOST ALL ITS BLOOD AND THE BLEEDING HAS SUBSIDED; SO WHAT?</p><p>If you&#8217;re looking for &#8220;good news&#8221; on the economy, re: unemployment, you need not look no farther than The Tim&#8217;s horrifying spike on his chart.</p><p>You will hear later today that the banks all passed the phony [Dr Roubini states] government stress tests, with phony unemployment rates, etc inserted in the math S./W. Lipstick on the pig, that doesn&#8217;t mean a thing.</p><p>Read the Beige Book account of the economy through early April, as is states in part:</p><p>&#8220;&#8230;Almost all sectors were contracting or slowing in almost all regions, the Beige Books said. Manufacturing weakened, retail spending was &#8220;sluggish,&#8221; the housing markets were &#8220;weak&#8221; and banks reported rising delinquencies and deteriorating loan quality&#8230;.&#8221;</p><p>The rest of the URL:</p><p><a
href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/us-economy-still-contracting-everywhere/story.aspx?guid=%7B33DD5B9D%2D0C0E%2D4E4A%2D8D68%2D7D2ECE8687FE%7D&amp;siteid=bnbh" rel="nofollow">http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/us-economy-still-contracting-everywhere/story.aspx?guid=%7B33DD5B9D%2D0C0E%2D4E4A%2D8D68%2D7D2ECE8687FE%7D&amp;siteid=bnbh</a></p><p>P.S., Dr Roubini allegedly turned down a cabinet job with Obama; because he likes being as clear, pragmatic and honest as he can [even he uses lipstick on the pig too], as an almost free man on his RGE website.<div
class="comment-remix-meta"><a
href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('70716','softwarengineer',''); return false;">Reply</a> &#8211; <a
href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('70716','softwarengineer','THE ECONOMY HAS LOST ALL ITS BLOOD AND THE BLEEDING HAS SUBSIDED; SO WHAT?\r\n\r\nIf you\'re looking for \&quot;good news\&quot; on the economy, re: unemployment, you need not look no farther than The Tim\'s horrifying spike on his chart. \r\n\r\nYou will hear later today that the banks all passed the phony &amp;#91;Dr Roubini states&amp;#93; government stress tests, with phony unemployment rates, etc inserted in the math S.\/W. Lipstick on the pig, that doesn\'t mean a thing.\r\n\r\nRead the Beige Book account of the economy through early April, as is states in part:\r\n\r\n\&quot;...Almost all sectors were contracting or slowing in almost all regions, the Beige Books said. Manufacturing weakened, retail spending was \&quot;sluggish,\&quot; the housing markets were \&quot;weak\&quot; and banks reported rising delinquencies and deteriorating loan quality....\&quot;\r\n\r\nThe rest of the URL:\r\n\r\nhttp:\/\/www.marketwatch.com\/news\/story\/us-economy-still-contracting-everywhere\/story.aspx?guid=%7B33DD5B9D%2D0C0E%2D4E4A%2D8D68%2D7D2ECE8687FE%7D&amp;amp;siteid=bnbh\r\n\r\nP.S., Dr Roubini allegedly turned down a cabinet job with Obama; because he likes being as clear, pragmatic and honest as he can &amp;#91;even he uses lipstick on the pig too&amp;#93;, as an almost free man on his RGE website.',''); return false;">Quote</a></div> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: BillE</title><link>http://seattlebubble.com/blog/2009/04/15/unemployment-reaches-record-levels-but-rate-of-increase-slows/#comment-70715</link> <dc:creator>BillE</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 18:47:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://seattlebubble.com/blog/?p=5132#comment-70715</guid> <description>The numbers reported last month already had Snohomish County at 9.9%.
http://www.heraldnet.com/article/20090317/BIZ/903179989&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;70715&#039;,&#039;BillE&#039;,&#039;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;70715&#039;,&#039;BillE&#039;,&#039;The numbers reported last month already had Snohomish County at 9.9%.\r\nhttp:\/\/www.heraldnet.com\/article\/20090317\/BIZ\/903179989&#039;,&#039;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The numbers reported last month already had Snohomish County at 9.9%.<br
/> <a
href="http://www.heraldnet.com/article/20090317/BIZ/903179989" rel="nofollow">http://www.heraldnet.com/article/20090317/BIZ/903179989</a><div
class="comment-remix-meta"><a
href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('70715','BillE',''); return false;">Reply</a> &#8211; <a
href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('70715','BillE','The numbers reported last month already had Snohomish County at 9.9%.\r\nhttp:\/\/www.heraldnet.com\/article\/20090317\/BIZ\/903179989',''); return false;">Quote</a></div> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Peckhammer</title><link>http://seattlebubble.com/blog/2009/04/15/unemployment-reaches-record-levels-but-rate-of-increase-slows/#comment-70714</link> <dc:creator>Peckhammer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 18:43:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://seattlebubble.com/blog/?p=5132#comment-70714</guid> <description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;Could this be the first sign that things are starting to level off?&quot;&lt;/i&gt;I doubt it. The University of Washington will be laying off a whole bunch of it&#039;s work force, and I expect many more layoffs to be announced at other Seattle/Washington agencies and businesses.&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;70714&#039;,&#039;Peckhammer&#039;,&#039;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;70714&#039;,&#039;Peckhammer&#039;,&#039;&lt;i&gt;\&quot;Could this be the first sign that things are starting to level off?\&quot;&lt;\/i&gt;\r\n\r\nI doubt it. The University of Washington will be laying off a whole bunch of it\&#039;s work force, and I expect many more layoffs to be announced at other Seattle\/Washington agencies and businesses.&#039;,&#039;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;Could this be the first sign that things are starting to level off?&#8221;</i></p><p>I doubt it. The University of Washington will be laying off a whole bunch of it&#8217;s work force, and I expect many more layoffs to be announced at other Seattle/Washington agencies and businesses.<div
class="comment-remix-meta"><a
href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('70714','Peckhammer',''); return false;">Reply</a> &#8211; <a
href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('70714','Peckhammer','&lt;i&gt;\&quot;Could this be the first sign that things are starting to level off?\&quot;&lt;\/i&gt;\r\n\r\nI doubt it. The University of Washington will be laying off a whole bunch of it\'s work force, and I expect many more layoffs to be announced at other Seattle\/Washington agencies and businesses.',''); return false;">Quote</a></div> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Lake Hills Landlord</title><link>http://seattlebubble.com/blog/2009/04/15/unemployment-reaches-record-levels-but-rate-of-increase-slows/#comment-70713</link> <dc:creator>Lake Hills Landlord</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 18:00:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://seattlebubble.com/blog/?p=5132#comment-70713</guid> <description>@BubbleBuyerI&#039;m trying to do both.  Prepare for the worst.  Hope for the best.  And include plans for a nominal future.  This means stocking up on survival skills and supplies, enjoying day-to-day life, and continuing to fund my 401k (even though the government will probably confiscate these if things get much worse).  If things go bad, I&#039;ll be prepared.  Meanwhile I&#039;m having fun day-to-day.  And if we continue to see normal ups and downs for 30+ years, my 401k might actually be worth something.&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;70713&#039;,&#039;Lake Hills Landlord&#039;,&#039;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;70713&#039;,&#039;Lake Hills Landlord&#039;,&#039;@BubbleBuyer\r\n\r\nI\&#039;m trying to do both.  Prepare for the worst.  Hope for the best.  And include plans for a nominal future.  This means stocking up on survival skills and supplies, enjoying day-to-day life, and continuing to fund my 401k (even though the government will probably confiscate these if things get much worse).  If things go bad, I\&#039;ll be prepared.  Meanwhile I\&#039;m having fun day-to-day.  And if we continue to see normal ups and downs for 30+ years, my 401k might actually be worth something.&#039;,&#039;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@BubbleBuyer</p><p>I&#8217;m trying to do both.  Prepare for the worst.  Hope for the best.  And include plans for a nominal future.  This means stocking up on survival skills and supplies, enjoying day-to-day life, and continuing to fund my 401k (even though the government will probably confiscate these if things get much worse).  If things go bad, I&#8217;ll be prepared.  Meanwhile I&#8217;m having fun day-to-day.  And if we continue to see normal ups and downs for 30+ years, my 401k might actually be worth something.<div
class="comment-remix-meta"><a
href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('70713','Lake Hills Landlord',''); return false;">Reply</a> &#8211; <a
href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('70713','Lake Hills Landlord','@BubbleBuyer\r\n\r\nI\'m trying to do both.  Prepare for the worst.  Hope for the best.  And include plans for a nominal future.  This means stocking up on survival skills and supplies, enjoying day-to-day life, and continuing to fund my 401k (even though the government will probably confiscate these if things get much worse).  If things go bad, I\'ll be prepared.  Meanwhile I\'m having fun day-to-day.  And if we continue to see normal ups and downs for 30+ years, my 401k might actually be worth something.',''); return false;">Quote</a></div> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Magnolia44</title><link>http://seattlebubble.com/blog/2009/04/15/unemployment-reaches-record-levels-but-rate-of-increase-slows/#comment-70712</link> <dc:creator>Magnolia44</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 17:32:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://seattlebubble.com/blog/?p=5132#comment-70712</guid> <description>News this morning had seattle at 8%, that&#039;s the number I will focus on.&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;70712&#039;,&#039;Magnolia44&#039;,&#039;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;70712&#039;,&#039;Magnolia44&#039;,&#039;News this morning had seattle at 8%, that\&#039;s the number I will focus on.&#039;,&#039;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>News this morning had seattle at 8%, that&#8217;s the number I will focus on.<div
class="comment-remix-meta"><a
href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('70712','Magnolia44',''); return false;">Reply</a> &#8211; <a
href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('70712','Magnolia44','News this morning had seattle at 8%, that\'s the number I will focus on.',''); return false;">Quote</a></div> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: deejayoh</title><link>http://seattlebubble.com/blog/2009/04/15/unemployment-reaches-record-levels-but-rate-of-increase-slows/#comment-70711</link> <dc:creator>deejayoh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 17:28:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://seattlebubble.com/blog/?p=5132#comment-70711</guid> <description>Important to keep in perspective that unemployment is typically a lagging indicator for economic activity.  In almost every modern recession by the time unemployment peaks, the economy has usually turned around and is growing again.I suspect we haven&#039;t peaked yet but it is probably close.PI layoff tracker hasn&#039;t updated in about 2 months so I guess that has died with most of the rest of the paper.&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;70711&#039;,&#039;deejayoh&#039;,&#039;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;70711&#039;,&#039;deejayoh&#039;,&#039;Important to keep in perspective that unemployment is typically a lagging indicator for economic activity.  In almost every modern recession by the time unemployment peaks, the economy has usually turned around and is growing again.\r\n\r\nI suspect we haven\&#039;t peaked yet but it is probably close.\r\n\r\nPI layoff tracker hasn\&#039;t updated in about 2 months so I guess that has died with most of the rest of the paper.&#039;,&#039;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Important to keep in perspective that unemployment is typically a lagging indicator for economic activity.  In almost every modern recession by the time unemployment peaks, the economy has usually turned around and is growing again.</p><p>I suspect we haven&#8217;t peaked yet but it is probably close.</p><p>PI layoff tracker hasn&#8217;t updated in about 2 months so I guess that has died with most of the rest of the paper.<div
class="comment-remix-meta"><a
href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('70711','deejayoh',''); return false;">Reply</a> &#8211; <a
href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('70711','deejayoh','Important to keep in perspective that unemployment is typically a lagging indicator for economic activity.  In almost every modern recession by the time unemployment peaks, the economy has usually turned around and is growing again.\r\n\r\nI suspect we haven\'t peaked yet but it is probably close.\r\n\r\nPI layoff tracker hasn\'t updated in about 2 months so I guess that has died with most of the rest of the paper.',''); return false;">Quote</a></div> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: BubbleBuyer</title><link>http://seattlebubble.com/blog/2009/04/15/unemployment-reaches-record-levels-but-rate-of-increase-slows/#comment-70710</link> <dc:creator>BubbleBuyer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 16:37:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://seattlebubble.com/blog/?p=5132#comment-70710</guid> <description>What I struggle with in determining my future investment and lifestyle path is whether to focus on short  to intermediate term economic economic outlook or whether to focus more on the long term.In the former case you could convince me that economic activity may pick up and that things will go back to &quot;normal&quot;However the longer term prospects for the USA are dire. We have massive current account deficits that will more than double with the total deficit exceeding the total GDP of the USA by 2015 or so. Less than 50% of the US population will pay income taxes. The USA doesn&#039;t produce much of value anymore and we generate $59 billion plus a month in trade deficits primarily with Japan, China and Germany. China, Japan and Germany are financing our outlandish lifestyles and as the USA tries to inflate it&#039;s way out of its obligations the dollar will collapse.  It is uncertain how much longer our creditors will continue to loan us money to keep the ponzi scheme going. At minimum, they will demand higher interest rates to provide them with a real return on their investments. This will dramatically curtail economic activity by significantly raising interest rates.So what do you do? Continue to live your life or prepare for the coming economic Armageddon? On the upside, it is nice having a president that knows how to use a prompter and sound half intelligent. On the downside, our new leader is not proposing anything that will right the structural flaws in our trade, environmental and workplace policies and bring the intermediate portion of the economic value chain back to the USA, creating opportunity for the middle class.I guess personally, I play it conservatively and will continue to pay down my debt - mortgage and car - with the intent of being debt free within 7 years. At the same time you only get to live once so I will try to balance that in a way that provides me with some enjoyment although that probably means downgrading from Napa Cabernet to the Costco blend.&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;70710&#039;,&#039;BubbleBuyer&#039;,&#039;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;70710&#039;,&#039;BubbleBuyer&#039;,&#039;What I struggle with in determining my future investment and lifestyle path is whether to focus on short  to intermediate term economic economic outlook or whether to focus more on the long term.\n\nIn the former case you could convince me that economic activity may pick up and that things will go back to \&quot;normal\&quot;\n\nHowever the longer term prospects for the USA are dire. We have massive current account deficits that will more than double with the total deficit exceeding the total GDP of the USA by 2015 or so. Less than 50% of the US population will pay income taxes. The USA doesn\&#039;t produce much of value anymore and we generate $59 billion plus a month in trade deficits primarily with Japan, China and Germany. China, Japan and Germany are financing our outlandish lifestyles and as the USA tries to inflate it\&#039;s way out of its obligations the dollar will collapse.  It is uncertain how much longer our creditors will continue to loan us money to keep the ponzi scheme going. At minimum, they will demand higher interest rates to provide them with a real return on their investments. This will dramatically curtail economic activity by significantly raising interest rates.\n\nSo what do you do? Continue to live your life or prepare for the coming economic Armageddon? On the upside, it is nice having a president that knows how to use a prompter and sound half intelligent. On the downside, our new leader is not proposing anything that will right the structural flaws in our trade, environmental and workplace policies and bring the intermediate portion of the economic value chain back to the USA, creating opportunity for the middle class.\n\nI guess personally, I play it conservatively and will continue to pay down my debt - mortgage and car - with the intent of being debt free within 7 years. At the same time you only get to live once so I will try to balance that in a way that provides me with some enjoyment although that probably means downgrading from Napa Cabernet to the Costco blend.&#039;,&#039;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I struggle with in determining my future investment and lifestyle path is whether to focus on short  to intermediate term economic economic outlook or whether to focus more on the long term.</p><p>In the former case you could convince me that economic activity may pick up and that things will go back to &#8220;normal&#8221;</p><p>However the longer term prospects for the USA are dire. We have massive current account deficits that will more than double with the total deficit exceeding the total GDP of the USA by 2015 or so. Less than 50% of the US population will pay income taxes. The USA doesn&#8217;t produce much of value anymore and we generate $59 billion plus a month in trade deficits primarily with Japan, China and Germany. China, Japan and Germany are financing our outlandish lifestyles and as the USA tries to inflate it&#8217;s way out of its obligations the dollar will collapse.  It is uncertain how much longer our creditors will continue to loan us money to keep the ponzi scheme going. At minimum, they will demand higher interest rates to provide them with a real return on their investments. This will dramatically curtail economic activity by significantly raising interest rates.</p><p>So what do you do? Continue to live your life or prepare for the coming economic Armageddon? On the upside, it is nice having a president that knows how to use a prompter and sound half intelligent. On the downside, our new leader is not proposing anything that will right the structural flaws in our trade, environmental and workplace policies and bring the intermediate portion of the economic value chain back to the USA, creating opportunity for the middle class.</p><p>I guess personally, I play it conservatively and will continue to pay down my debt &#8211; mortgage and car &#8211; with the intent of being debt free within 7 years. At the same time you only get to live once so I will try to balance that in a way that provides me with some enjoyment although that probably means downgrading from Napa Cabernet to the Costco blend.<div
class="comment-remix-meta"><a
href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('70710','BubbleBuyer',''); return false;">Reply</a> &#8211; <a
href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('70710','BubbleBuyer','What I struggle with in determining my future investment and lifestyle path is whether to focus on short  to intermediate term economic economic outlook or whether to focus more on the long term.\n\nIn the former case you could convince me that economic activity may pick up and that things will go back to \&quot;normal\&quot;\n\nHowever the longer term prospects for the USA are dire. We have massive current account deficits that will more than double with the total deficit exceeding the total GDP of the USA by 2015 or so. Less than 50% of the US population will pay income taxes. The USA doesn\'t produce much of value anymore and we generate $59 billion plus a month in trade deficits primarily with Japan, China and Germany. China, Japan and Germany are financing our outlandish lifestyles and as the USA tries to inflate it\'s way out of its obligations the dollar will collapse.  It is uncertain how much longer our creditors will continue to loan us money to keep the ponzi scheme going. At minimum, they will demand higher interest rates to provide them with a real return on their investments. This will dramatically curtail economic activity by significantly raising interest rates.\n\nSo what do you do? Continue to live your life or prepare for the coming economic Armageddon? On the upside, it is nice having a president that knows how to use a prompter and sound half intelligent. On the downside, our new leader is not proposing anything that will right the structural flaws in our trade, environmental and workplace policies and bring the intermediate portion of the economic value chain back to the USA, creating opportunity for the middle class.\n\nI guess personally, I play it conservatively and will continue to pay down my debt - mortgage and car - with the intent of being debt free within 7 years. At the same time you only get to live once so I will try to balance that in a way that provides me with some enjoyment although that probably means downgrading from Napa Cabernet to the Costco blend.',''); return false;">Quote</a></div> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mama</title><link>http://seattlebubble.com/blog/2009/04/15/unemployment-reaches-record-levels-but-rate-of-increase-slows/#comment-70709</link> <dc:creator>Mama</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 16:22:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://seattlebubble.com/blog/?p=5132#comment-70709</guid> <description>What was interesting to me was that per the Seattle Times article the Bellevue-Everett-Seattle are is actually below national average...Yet the state as a whole was way above it. Did WA have higher exposure to construction jobs? I wonder what type of jobs were lost that
1) Pull WA above the nat&#039;l average
2) Were outside of the main metro area&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;70709&#039;,&#039;Mama&#039;,&#039;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;70709&#039;,&#039;Mama&#039;,&#039;What was interesting to me was that per the Seattle Times article the Bellevue-Everett-Seattle are is actually below national average...Yet the state as a whole was way above it. Did WA have higher exposure to construction jobs? I wonder what type of jobs were lost that \r\n1) Pull WA above the nat\&#039;l average\r\n2) Were outside of the main metro area&#039;,&#039;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What was interesting to me was that per the Seattle Times article the Bellevue-Everett-Seattle are is actually below national average&#8230;Yet the state as a whole was way above it. Did WA have higher exposure to construction jobs? I wonder what type of jobs were lost that<br
/> 1) Pull WA above the nat&#8217;l average<br
/> 2) Were outside of the main metro area<div
class="comment-remix-meta"><a
href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('70709','Mama',''); return false;">Reply</a> &#8211; <a
href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('70709','Mama','What was interesting to me was that per the Seattle Times article the Bellevue-Everett-Seattle are is actually below national average...Yet the state as a whole was way above it. Did WA have higher exposure to construction jobs? I wonder what type of jobs were lost that \r\n1) Pull WA above the nat\'l average\r\n2) Were outside of the main metro area',''); return false;">Quote</a></div> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ray Pepper</title><link>http://seattlebubble.com/blog/2009/04/15/unemployment-reaches-record-levels-but-rate-of-increase-slows/#comment-70708</link> <dc:creator>Ray Pepper</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 16:12:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://seattlebubble.com/blog/?p=5132#comment-70708</guid> <description>20% unemployment in Seattle Tim?  In my home town of Reno possibly but are we shutting down the ports?  GOOD GOD!  If you believe this better load up on SKF!&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;70708&#039;,&#039;Ray Pepper&#039;,&#039;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;70708&#039;,&#039;Ray Pepper&#039;,&#039;20% unemployment in Seattle Tim?  In my home town of Reno possibly but are we shutting down the ports?  GOOD GOD!  If you believe this better load up on SKF!&#039;,&#039;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>20% unemployment in Seattle Tim?  In my home town of Reno possibly but are we shutting down the ports?  GOOD GOD!  If you believe this better load up on SKF!<div
class="comment-remix-meta"><a
href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('70708','Ray Pepper',''); return false;">Reply</a> &#8211; <a
href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('70708','Ray Pepper','20% unemployment in Seattle Tim?  In my home town of Reno possibly but are we shutting down the ports?  GOOD GOD!  If you believe this better load up on SKF!',''); return false;">Quote</a></div> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: seattlebubble.com @ 2010-03-14 03:31:23 by W3 Total Cache -->