Comments on: Weekly Twitter Digest (Link Roundup) for 2009-11-14 http://seattlebubble.com/blog/2009/11/14/weekly-twitter-digest-link-roundup-for-2009-11-14/ local real estate news, statistics, and commentary without the sales spin. Sun, 14 Mar 2010 18:35:22 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Ray Pepperhttp://seattlebubble.com/blog/2009/11/14/weekly-twitter-digest-link-roundup-for-2009-11-14/#comment-87339 Ray Pepper Sun, 15 Nov 2009 10:15:57 +0000 http://seattlebubble.com/blog/2009/11/14/weekly-twitter-digest-link-roundup-for-2009-11-14/#comment-87339 Ahhhhh. Steve Tytler...........I love his Monday Morning quarterback predictions. You get the tone from him that he has been Seattle Bubblized. I do. Hows his broker friend doing in AZ?GO Red Fin Go! Your little brother is pulling for you! Go go go!<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('87339','Ray Pepper',''); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('87339','Ray Pepper','Ahhhhh. Steve Tytler...........I love his Monday Morning quarterback predictions. You get the tone from him that he has been Seattle Bubblized. I do. Hows his broker friend doing in AZ?\r\n\r\n\r\nGO Red Fin Go! Your little brother is pulling for you! Go go go!',''); return false;">Quote</a></div> Ahhhhh. Steve Tytler………..I love his Monday Morning quarterback predictions. You get the tone from him that he has been Seattle Bubblized. I do. Hows his broker friend doing in AZ?

GO Red Fin Go! Your little brother is pulling for you! Go go go!

Reply – Quote
]]> By: Kary L. Krismerhttp://seattlebubble.com/blog/2009/11/14/weekly-twitter-digest-link-roundup-for-2009-11-14/#comment-87314 Kary L. Krismer Sat, 14 Nov 2009 18:58:50 +0000 http://seattlebubble.com/blog/2009/11/14/weekly-twitter-digest-link-roundup-for-2009-11-14/#comment-87314 <b>RE:</b> <a href='#comment-87310' rel="nofollow">David Losh @ 4</a> - Well first, the problem is that some congresspeople will not vote for the legislation if there is no abortion language, and some won't vote for it if there is. Since it's just squeaking through, that's problematic.In the bankruptcy legislation the dispute arose over language that would made damages caused by abortion protesters non-dischargeable (they'd still owe the money). The thing was, any such damages would almost certainly be the result of an intentional act, and thus would have already been non-dischargeable. But somehow, that held it up. Since most of the legislation was bank sponsored BS I didn't really care that it held up the changes. But if it hadn't held it up maybe I would have become an agent three to four years earlier, or maybe not at all.<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('87314','Kary L. Krismer',''); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('87314','Kary L. Krismer','<b>RE:<\/b> <a href=\'#comment-87310\' rel=\"nofollow\">David Losh @ 4<\/a> - Well first, the problem is that some congresspeople will not vote for the legislation if there is no abortion language, and some won\'t vote for it if there is. Since it\'s just squeaking through, that\'s problematic.\n\nIn the bankruptcy legislation the dispute arose over language that would made damages caused by abortion protesters non-dischargeable (they\'d still owe the money). The thing was, any such damages would almost certainly be the result of an intentional act, and thus would have already been non-dischargeable. But somehow, that held it up. Since most of the legislation was bank sponsored BS I didn\'t really care that it held up the changes. But if it hadn\'t held it up maybe I would have become an agent three to four years earlier, or maybe not at all.',''); return false;">Quote</a></div> RE: David Losh @ 4 – Well first, the problem is that some congresspeople will not vote for the legislation if there is no abortion language, and some won’t vote for it if there is. Since it’s just squeaking through, that’s problematic.

In the bankruptcy legislation the dispute arose over language that would made damages caused by abortion protesters non-dischargeable (they’d still owe the money). The thing was, any such damages would almost certainly be the result of an intentional act, and thus would have already been non-dischargeable. But somehow, that held it up. Since most of the legislation was bank sponsored BS I didn’t really care that it held up the changes. But if it hadn’t held it up maybe I would have become an agent three to four years earlier, or maybe not at all.

Reply – Quote
]]> By: truthtoldhttp://seattlebubble.com/blog/2009/11/14/weekly-twitter-digest-link-roundup-for-2009-11-14/#comment-87313 truthtold Sat, 14 Nov 2009 18:57:21 +0000 http://seattlebubble.com/blog/2009/11/14/weekly-twitter-digest-link-roundup-for-2009-11-14/#comment-87313 Hi Kary, In brief, preemptive strike or unnecessary war involving billions of bucks and unspeakable human cost, have a way of terminating domestic benefit. Many things became impozzible to attain and despite endless econ.fuzz and self-indulgent (call yo'self educated) prattle, guns or butter are x and y... this is 101. Civilized goal of health care for citizenry is quite naturally impozzible. Many things are now quite naturally out of reach. A stupid legacy is somewhat assured. War is failure.<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('87313','truthtold',''); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('87313','truthtold','Hi Kary,\r\nIn brief, preemptive strike or unnecessary war involving billions of bucks and unspeakable human cost, have a way of terminating domestic benefit. Many things became impozzible to attain and despite endless econ.fuzz and self-indulgent (call yo\'self educated) prattle, guns or butter are x and y... this is 101.\r\nCivilized goal of health care for citizenry is quite naturally impozzible.\r\nMany things are now quite naturally out of reach.\r\nA stupid legacy is somewhat assured.\r\nWar is failure.',''); return false;">Quote</a></div> Hi Kary,
In brief, preemptive strike or unnecessary war involving billions of bucks and unspeakable human cost, have a way of terminating domestic benefit. Many things became impozzible to attain and despite endless econ.fuzz and self-indulgent (call yo’self educated) prattle, guns or butter are x and y… this is 101.
Civilized goal of health care for citizenry is quite naturally impozzible.
Many things are now quite naturally out of reach.
A stupid legacy is somewhat assured.
War is failure.
Reply – Quote
]]> By: David Loshhttp://seattlebubble.com/blog/2009/11/14/weekly-twitter-digest-link-roundup-for-2009-11-14/#comment-87310 David Losh Sat, 14 Nov 2009 18:00:42 +0000 http://seattlebubble.com/blog/2009/11/14/weekly-twitter-digest-link-roundup-for-2009-11-14/#comment-87310 Fine, no abortion in the Health Care Reform Act, what does that have to do with Bankruptcy Legislation?<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('87310','David Losh',''); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('87310','David Losh','Fine, no abortion in the Health Care Reform Act, what does that have to do with Bankruptcy Legislation?',''); return false;">Quote</a></div> Fine, no abortion in the Health Care Reform Act, what does that have to do with Bankruptcy Legislation?
Reply – Quote
]]> By: Kary L. Krismerhttp://seattlebubble.com/blog/2009/11/14/weekly-twitter-digest-link-roundup-for-2009-11-14/#comment-87307 Kary L. Krismer Sat, 14 Nov 2009 17:07:04 +0000 http://seattlebubble.com/blog/2009/11/14/weekly-twitter-digest-link-roundup-for-2009-11-14/#comment-87307 I think health care died when it got tied up in the abortion debate. That actually delayed the enactment of the new bankruptcy act by 3-4 years, for no reason whatsoever. But I think that's going to make it much harder to get through the Senate, and if it does, reconciling is going to be a bear if not impossible.<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('87307','Kary L. Krismer',''); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('87307','Kary L. Krismer','I think health care died when it got tied up in the abortion debate. That actually delayed the enactment of the new bankruptcy act by 3-4 years, for no reason whatsoever. But I think that\'s going to make it much harder to get through the Senate, and if it does, reconciling is going to be a bear if not impossible.',''); return false;">Quote</a></div> I think health care died when it got tied up in the abortion debate. That actually delayed the enactment of the new bankruptcy act by 3-4 years, for no reason whatsoever. But I think that’s going to make it much harder to get through the Senate, and if it does, reconciling is going to be a bear if not impossible.
Reply – Quote
]]> By: softwarengineerhttp://seattlebubble.com/blog/2009/11/14/weekly-twitter-digest-link-roundup-for-2009-11-14/#comment-87302 softwarengineer Sat, 14 Nov 2009 16:37:01 +0000 http://seattlebubble.com/blog/2009/11/14/weekly-twitter-digest-link-roundup-for-2009-11-14/#comment-87302 Regarding the National Debt Clock ArticleAnother SB blogger already mentioned it, but Obama has announced yesterday that he is now going to cut domestic spending by about 5% for the 2010 budget....LOL....does that mean Obamacare is down the toilet?<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('87302','softwarengineer',''); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('87302','softwarengineer','Regarding the National Debt Clock Article\r\n\r\nAnother SB blogger already mentioned it, but Obama has announced yesterday that he is now going to cut domestic spending by about 5% for the 2010 budget....LOL....does that mean Obamacare is down the toilet?',''); return false;">Quote</a></div> Regarding the National Debt Clock Article

Another SB blogger already mentioned it, but Obama has announced yesterday that he is now going to cut domestic spending by about 5% for the 2010 budget….LOL….does that mean Obamacare is down the toilet?

Reply – Quote
]]> By: Kary L. Krismerhttp://seattlebubble.com/blog/2009/11/14/weekly-twitter-digest-link-roundup-for-2009-11-14/#comment-87297 Kary L. Krismer Sat, 14 Nov 2009 16:23:04 +0000 http://seattlebubble.com/blog/2009/11/14/weekly-twitter-digest-link-roundup-for-2009-11-14/#comment-87297 The stories on the Mastro suit are next to worthless because they're merely reporting on allegations in the complaint and answer. The bankruptcy court uses a modified version of the federal rules and the federal rules use notice pleading. That basically means that both sides tend to through the kitchen sink at one another (putting each on notice of any claim or defense they might use), limited only by what might be frivolous. They can even be internally conflicting, such as "I didn't do it!" and "I did it, but Joe is at fault." Writing news stories on it is about as close to pointless as you can get, especially when it comes to answers. Answers almost never admit liability.Just as an example, if I happened to have reason to sue the Pope, I'd also name Jane Doe Pope (I know--not his real last name) as his wife and claim any liability was both community and separate. That's the way it works.<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('87297','Kary L. Krismer',''); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('87297','Kary L. Krismer','The stories on the Mastro suit are next to worthless because they\'re merely reporting on allegations in the complaint and answer. The bankruptcy court uses a modified version of the federal rules and the federal rules use notice pleading. That basically means that both sides tend to through the kitchen sink at one another (putting each on notice of any claim or defense they might use), limited only by what might be frivolous. They can even be internally conflicting, such as \"I didn\'t do it!\" and \"I did it, but Joe is at fault.\" Writing news stories on it is about as close to pointless as you can get, especially when it comes to answers. Answers almost never admit liability.\n\nJust as an example, if I happened to have reason to sue the Pope, I\'d also name Jane Doe Pope (I know--not his real last name) as his wife and claim any liability was both community and separate. That\'s the way it works.',''); return false;">Quote</a></div> The stories on the Mastro suit are next to worthless because they’re merely reporting on allegations in the complaint and answer. The bankruptcy court uses a modified version of the federal rules and the federal rules use notice pleading. That basically means that both sides tend to through the kitchen sink at one another (putting each on notice of any claim or defense they might use), limited only by what might be frivolous. They can even be internally conflicting, such as “I didn’t do it!” and “I did it, but Joe is at fault.” Writing news stories on it is about as close to pointless as you can get, especially when it comes to answers. Answers almost never admit liability.

Just as an example, if I happened to have reason to sue the Pope, I’d also name Jane Doe Pope (I know–not his real last name) as his wife and claim any liability was both community and separate. That’s the way it works.

Reply – Quote
]]>