North King, South Snohomish houses - all old and worn out?
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 4:36 pm
Ok, I'm looking to buy later this year and have begun looking what what is available in my price range (say ~$340K max for a 3/1 place with a garage and a bit of room for a garden). I'm looking in the South Snohomish area (Edmonds, Lynnwood, MLT) since it is a decent split between my south Everett and south Seattle work locations. North King County isn't completely out, but I'd prefer the (somewhat) lower taxes of Snohomish county.
Most of the houses here date from the 1950s - 1960s, with some '70s, '80s, etc, sprinkled in. Most of the 50s/60s houses seem to be 'original', which to me looks to be old and worn out. A small percentage have been remodeled (for better or worse) and priced accordingly, but many just seem to be expensive and old. I don't expect a new house with new design and construction features, but am I out of line to think a 1950s 1100 - 1300sqft 'original issue' place somewhat expensive when it is in the $340K range, or is that just the market?
Considering what I've been seeing, I'm tempted to just keep renting, perhaps paying a bit more than I do now, but less than PITI payments would be.
Most of the houses here date from the 1950s - 1960s, with some '70s, '80s, etc, sprinkled in. Most of the 50s/60s houses seem to be 'original', which to me looks to be old and worn out. A small percentage have been remodeled (for better or worse) and priced accordingly, but many just seem to be expensive and old. I don't expect a new house with new design and construction features, but am I out of line to think a 1950s 1100 - 1300sqft 'original issue' place somewhat expensive when it is in the $340K range, or is that just the market?
Considering what I've been seeing, I'm tempted to just keep renting, perhaps paying a bit more than I do now, but less than PITI payments would be.