by rose-colored-coolaid » Fri Sep 26, 2008 6:29 am
That's a tough comparison (Japan 1990 to USA 2008). The USA economy is much larger than Japan's was (percentage WDP (world domestic product)). It's entirely possible that our failure would more negatively impact the global economy than Japan's did. Meanwhile, the world at large is both stronger economically and less stable.
Twenty years ago, there were the first world and the third. Now, you've got places like India, China, South Korea, Russia, Brazil, Argentina, Chile, Turkey, Ukraine, and Mexico where the economies are actually growing quite rapidly but they don't have the stability the more entrenched nations do. Meanwhile, the entrenched nations are largely running deficits and import more of their consumables than ever before. This is true in pretty much any country that doesn't export hydrocarbons (Europe for example) even if it's more pronounced here in the states.
Add on top of that, this was a credit boom, not a housing boom and credit boomed around the world. It's unwinding here, but also in Spain, UK, and Australia just to name a few specific places. To cap it all off, the US financial markets have been the gold-standard for years now. Institutions across the globe have significant money in US bonds or T-Bills or other financial devices. If we stop paying those, it will definitely impact not just us.
While I like the comparison to Japan just so we can apply some lessons learned (dragging out the crash only makes it more painful), I think there is ample reason not to apply the analogy too deeply.