20%??????
Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 3:16 pm
First of all, I'm a renter. And I'm new here, so forgive me if this has been brought up before...
But if they're talking about requiring 20% for a down payment like in the old days, people will never again buy homes in large numbers.
We live in a country with something close to a -1% savings rate, and people's stupidity keeps the economy going. Joe Public spending 101% of what he makes is good for local merchants.
Here's my question - has anyone personally seen this type of credit tightening?
I realize that banks need you to have some skin in the game so you can't just walk out on the loan, but 20% seems like they'd be committing suicide.
Even if the average Seattleite saved 10% a year and made $50k, if a house is $400k and he needs $80 to get his foot in the door, it would take him SIXTEEN YEARS to save up the cash (and plenty can happen in that time). And fine, even if the banks cut their requirement down to 5%, you're still looking at four years.
It's the right thing to do, but I don't see banks enforcing it. In fact, I think they'll get pressure from the federal government not to, because cash marinating in a savings account isn't keeping the economy going.
I think it'll be interesting to see how this element of it plays out.
But if they're talking about requiring 20% for a down payment like in the old days, people will never again buy homes in large numbers.
We live in a country with something close to a -1% savings rate, and people's stupidity keeps the economy going. Joe Public spending 101% of what he makes is good for local merchants.
Here's my question - has anyone personally seen this type of credit tightening?
I realize that banks need you to have some skin in the game so you can't just walk out on the loan, but 20% seems like they'd be committing suicide.
Even if the average Seattleite saved 10% a year and made $50k, if a house is $400k and he needs $80 to get his foot in the door, it would take him SIXTEEN YEARS to save up the cash (and plenty can happen in that time). And fine, even if the banks cut their requirement down to 5%, you're still looking at four years.
It's the right thing to do, but I don't see banks enforcing it. In fact, I think they'll get pressure from the federal government not to, because cash marinating in a savings account isn't keeping the economy going.
I think it'll be interesting to see how this element of it plays out.