Thanks to Deejayoh said for posting this info in yesterdays thread:
Seattle Metro/King-Snohomish Counties
10/31/06: 195/2,165 (9.0%)
11/30/06: 126/2,376 (5.3%)
12/30/06: 131/1,500 (8.7%)
01/30/07: 146/1,548 (9.4%)
02/27/07: 124/1,503 (8.3%)
03/30/07: 251/1,466 (17.1%)
04/30/07: 511/1,566 (32.6%)
It got me wondering why successful foreclosures are up, while preforeclosures are trending down.
I think what this points to is that banks are getting pickier at choosing which houses to foreclose on, and better at identifying which foreclosures will give them the highest return.
I read on Calculated Risk yesterday that many of these 80/20 loans are turning out to be "untouchable" in foreclosure for this reason:
- If a borrower defaults on the 2nd mortgage, the odds of recovering enough equity to make the foreclosure profitable are very low since homes typically sell at auction for 80% or less of the market value.
- In the event that the second mortgage holder does think there is enough equity to sucessfully foreclose, the borrower can then stop paying on their first mortgage. This encumbers the assett and puts the second mortgage holder second in line to recover anything from the foreclosure sale- thus wiping out pretty much any chance for the second mortgage holder to recover anything.
- The borrower can then catch up on paying the first mortgage and stop the foreclosure.
Pretty neat, huh? If you don't have to pay the second mortgage, houses are quite a bit more affordable than I thought!
Implications for Seattle specifically? Since our market is still relatively strong, banks have an incentive to foreclose quickly. Much more so than an area that has already seen 5% price declines.
As a result of this scenario happening on a wide scale, yesterday S&P made a dignificant downgrade of second mortgage debt. Anyone that thought the correction in the mortgage market was over was terrribly wrong. This downgrade will push up the interest rates on second mortgages and further tighten qualification standards.