Seattle Bubble

But how do you *know* that you're enjoying your life, if you're not better off than your neighbors?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/main.j ... ain122.xml

If you believe in silly "theories" like Evolution, then this absolutely makes sense. The desire to do better than your neighbors, and the desire of your parents that you should do better than them is very strong within us. The definition of "better" is that you have more things (Caveman voice: "ugga ugga, my mud hut bigger than yours"). It's all about procreation, man...

Capitalism (and the wealth it allows for) allows for increased happiness at the expense of a bunch of people that are miserable. You just have to hope you're born into a good family that isn't poor, have the correct color skin, a brain that functions well, and you too can exist on the nice end of the bell curve.

It seems that in uber capitalist societies, organized religion plays a large role in placating the misery of those on the wrong end of the bell curve. If your poorness and suffering has a grander "purpose" and the payoff exists after you die, then it's all the more tolerable. Indeed, the wealth of others can actually be something you can look down on and pity because there's no reward for wealth and greed when you go to heaven. Again, it's all about relative reward.

This is way off the mark Notabull. But if you replace "uber capitalist societies" with "any society with a highly uneven distribution of wealth" then I think you are spot on. Coincidentally, this explains why religion is so important in monarchies throughout history (Middle East today, Europe of yesteryear).

I found this article interesting, because I am a transplant myself (from Australia about 8 years ago). I must say that I have never noticed the phenomenon in the article.

Then again, almost all of my friends I met through work. I have met a few others through some hobbies and stuff, but for the most part I tend to keep in touch with people I worked with, or knew somebody I worked with.

Maybe the eastside is a bit different?

That applies to a lot of people! Probably doesn't apply so well to the "the best things in life are free" believers.


I think in socialist countries the definition is different. If not, why would those in socialist countries work less than 40 hours per week, get 6 weeks paid vacation per year (even if they work at McDonalds), and all sorts of other benefits? It's more about having more time than things.

Nope, I'm pretty sure he's right that the only definition of "better" is having more things than other people. I'll look it up and prove it to you.



I don't get it. None of those definitions involve a caveman. Well, at least we can take comfort in the fact that American social norms are the only legitimate ones in the world. So if that's how our society defines better it must be right.

/sarcasm

Personally, I'd feel better by getting ahead early on, having enough to be comfortable, and then not being tied to any particular job or line of work just because it pays well. I must be antisocial or something.

For me it's simple: I'm happy. I measure self improvement and happiness, not how "better" or "worse" I might be than others. I spend my time and money on things that I enjoy, and I couldn't care less how that stacks up against others or what they think about it. When I see a neighbor's nice car (as an example) I think that it is good for them, not that it somehow reflects on me or I need to get one better. I've had an expensive car, and I prefer what I have now. I suppose for some trying to be the best or have the most expensive is how they get self worth. Nothing wrong with that, but it's not howI'm wired. For me it's about being better than I was and being happy with what I have.

</hippie>

I didn't know hippie was an XHTML tag now. Boy has that language gotten out of hand.

"I think in socialist countries the definition is different. If not, why would those in socialist countries work less than 40 hours per week, get 6 weeks paid vacation per year (even if they work at McDonalds), and all sorts of other benefits? It's more about having more time than things."

I grew up in one of these "socialist" countries. I put it in quotes because England is socialist when compared to the US, but people there don't really consider the system to be a socialist one.

In England, pretty much everyone gets about 5 weeks of vacation when you start a job. Most people go on one big vacation a year (perhaps a week or two) and use the rest of the time off to spend with the kids at Easter, or Summer, or just to sit around the house. For sure, it's a nice thing to have. In my current job in Seattle I get three weeks of vacation. My take home pay for my job, and taking into account the purchasing power of that money, means I am much better off in the US than in England. I can afford to take unpaid time and still come out ahead of my peers in the old country. So I do...

Gas prices in the UK are about double what they are here. They don't fluctuate as much because it's so much more heavily taxed, so they're more usually three times as much. The people there are no different, though. If gas (petrol, mate!) was $2 a gallon, everyone would have an SUV just like here...

Why are there so many flights to New York from London? People actually make the five hour flight for a weekend shopping trip. They love the low sales tax, good exchange rate, and that they can buy more stuff!

Amen, Brother. I just don't think that's the majority. Most people judge themselves based on their position in social circles, how much crap they have compared to others, how much more "important" their job is compared to others, etc.

Classic dinner party conversations:

A) Where do you live?
B) I live in the CD.
A) Oh, I live in Madrona (aha! I'm probably more wealthy than you! Are you jealous?)

A) What do you do for living?
B) I'm a doctor.
C) I see. I'm a nurse. (Shit, you're more educated and more respected than me! I hate myself!)

A) What car do you drive?

A) I just got a promotion and a huge pay raise, how's your job going?

It's not just people in the states that are like this. IMO, if you have a society in which there is a more disproportionate spread of wealth, then these conversations just happen more often. It's the system, man!!!

"I don't get it. None of those definitions involve a caveman. Well, at least we can take comfort in the fact that American social norms are the only legitimate ones in the world. So if that's how our society defines better it must be right."

I don't think that the US defines "better" as any different to the rest of the world. IMO, people are pretty much the same the world over. In some countries they have more money and can buy more crap. In other countries with less money, they instead have a moral superiority over the US with their "materialistic" tendencies and then secretly wish they could afford a new BMW.

I get fed up of hearing about how people in Italy have it right, with their wine drinking, relaxed, inexpensive lifestyle that focuses on friends, family, etc. They're just the same as people in the US. If they had more money OR more easily available credit, they'd be at the mall foaming at the mouth like most people in the states.

Again, I'm generalizing, but with some experience of these countries and culture at least...

To me it doesn't feel like a freeze -- it feels more like a cone of lethargy born of some combination of self-congratulation, complacency, lack of interest in/ability to engage in critical thinking (but at the same time an unshakable confidence that one's own opinions and beliefs are correct and right), and tendency to take the mild expression of ideological differences as a personal attack.

Present company excepted, of course.

It is deeply weird and unlike any other place I've ever lived or spent enough time to feel entitled to make generalizations about its social mores. Even in Portland people seem more gregarious and more adept at, say, taking an ironic distance from selves, beliefs, etc. I came here straight out of college back east and for the first few years this scenario played itself out several times. I'd be talking to someone at a party, having a fine chat apparently enjoyed at both ends. Me: "Listen, I've enjoyed this, and I'd love to get together sometime for coffee or a drink." Other person, 100% serious: "Oh thanks, but I have enough friends right now." Even from single men I'd get this, and I am a not-hideous female. It was surreal to me but in the intervening years I've often told that story and people, men and women alike, get excited, saying Wow, that happened to me too, isn't this one nutty town. This is not the only way that in Seattle the concept of "enough," in non-material senses, feels atrophied to me. Which I suppose plays into my perception of complacency.

Possibly related? A few friends of mine, visiting at different times from different places, have made identical observations that people in Seattle spend a lot of time in bookstores and buy a lot of books, but they sure don't seem to have read them.

Please don't get all up in my Hibachi over these comments, Dear Readers. I'm here with my good, stable job that I get to on excellent public transportation, shacked up and saving down-payment money with a prince of a guy, so obviously I've made my peace with things. There are many factors to recommend Seattle and a lot of much worse places to be (cough Pittsburgh cough). I don't even opine like this unless prodded to do so, and in the spirit, I hope, of sharing information.

Civil Servant, you made some interesting observations. I've got a few guesses about why people might feel like they have enough friends.

1) Seattle is physically remote from the rest of the nation, but unlike several other remote parts of the country it has a mobile work force. If you live in NYC, there are perhaps a dozen major cities within about 100 miles that friends might move to for better jobs. In Seattle, there isn't one, unless you include Everett or Tacoma.

2) The Seattle metropolitan area covers a lot of space. It's difficult to meet up with friends who live in Everett if you live in Tacoma, unless you can find a nice venue in the middle to meat in. Which leads to...

3) For some reason, Seattle doesn't have very enjoyable or very used public spaces. Maybe it's the weather, but when I go to other major cities, they have parks that are filled with people. Here, not so much.

4) The winter doldrums mean that even if you found a good place to go meet up with said friends, you might find it hard to get the motivation to actually schedule a meeting.

Anyways, add that all together and unless your new friend lives in the same city you do, it can be a trial to build that friendship. If someone has gone through that enough times, they might just throw in the towel a little bit.

OK, that was all speculation, but does it ring true to anyone?

I think people work too hard, suffer from depression due to weather and are disproportionally introverted in this town. I wouldn't take it personally.

Me, I was lucky to move here knowing several very gregarious friends, so I never had to work to break into groups. In fact, I'm probably the reason some folks think there is a freeze - I just don't have time for any more friends.

Except for Green Lake and Alki on a warm sunny day...

I have noticed that Seattle natives generally take for granted the awesome variety of nature around them. I was floored when I met some 40 somethings native to the area who had never been to Rainier or Mt St Helen. I think that same apathy extends to the parks here, which generally speaking are pretty nice, pleasant to be in, and almost always empty. The midwest parks I frequented prior to moving here are boring (flat, mostly artificial, with little to see other than well manicured grass and trees) yet they get more use. Hard to explain.



This is definitely true. I've had people cancel plans or skip out on a group meet because "it's raining". I don't know how you can ever do anything in this city if rain bothers you that much. Again, this seems mostly to impact natives and CA/AZ transplants. The midwesterners and northeasters with memories of -20° wind chills, blizzards, etc don't seem to mind when it's 40 and drizzling.

How true. That's a big reason why I don't socialize much outside of a close circle of friends who don't spew that crap.