by faster » Wed Jan 23, 2008 11:46 am
What if it could be proven beyond argument that by using 2 atomic bombs in WWII the less people, on both sides, were killed.
In other words about 200,000 Japanese were killed by the two atomic bombs. What if not using those two atomic bombs resulted in 400,000 Japanese and 100,000 Americans being killed from the continued fighting.
Is the use of the atomic bombs in the above scenario still absolutely wrong.
btw...200,000 killed by the atomic bombs, but over 300,000 killed by the firebombing of Tokyo and other major Japanese cities.
Kary Krismer does not read Seattle Bubble, but he does reply to posts here.