by Civil Servant » Fri May 23, 2008 11:46 am
Speaking of before pics, here is a question I have had. Here we ostensibly see $270K worth of work being done to a house over the course of five months. (Let us assume for the sake of argument that the January sale price and today's asking price are both roughly fair.) Is it possible to do $270K worth of good -- i.e., high quality, will last -- work to your average Seattle house in that amount of time, labor + materials + compensation for the property owner's risk-taking? Because, Markor, when I first saw the house and price I thought what you did: Yeah, that would sell in a flash on the East Side. Then I scrolled down and saw the last and very recent sale price. At work I get involved sometimes with capital projects, I see contractor invoices, and $270K feels like a stretch here. Would love for some of you handymen and handyladies to weigh in.