The Fed is taking a different stance with Lehman (not willing to limit losses for potential buyers) than it did with Bear Stearns, which seems likely to result in Lehman going under.
The down side is that fear will spread through Wall Street, now that uncle Sam isn't stepping in to save Lehman with tax-payer money - resulting in selling of investment bank stocks.
The upside is that tax-payers aren't saddled with the debt.
All this is confusing to me for 2 reasons:
1) The current government usually favors large corporations over the tax-payer.
2) Isn't the government interested in devaluing our currency and "starting from scratch" to minimize our national debt? (Just a theory...)
Is this just Treasury Secretary Paulson trying to save his hide after questions being raised over previous bailouts of FNM/FRE/BSC, or is there a fundamental difference that makes Lehman Brothers less worth saving?