by perplexd » Sun Jun 24, 2007 5:33 pm
I used to make a very similar argument, but the answer "somebody probably lost money" isn't really satisfactory. Who lost money and was the money just moved around or actually pulled out of the economy? If it wasn't removed from the economy, then I'd say this was a wholly inflationary episode.
Now, it seems to me that the only way it is removed from the economy is if it was somehow the BANK who lost the money [and the Fed doesn't bail them out]. Someone defaults and the money is just gone, period. Then the new money created for other new loans is countered by the money destroyed by the action of the bank just writing a $300,000 loan right off their books.
Is that what they do? I honestly don't know. Somehow I doubt this is that kind of a zero-sum game for the banking industry. It would be like having a casino shut down in vegas because people happened to start beating the odds for a couple weeks, and what's an honest casino operator to do against fate? Well, we know what the casino operator does, but somehow we don't like to think bankers do, effectively, the same things with their 'odds'.
“Of all the contrivances for cheating the laboring classes of mankind, none has been more effective than that which deludes them with paper money.” - Daniel Webster