by Scotsman » Wed Jan 09, 2008 10:01 pm
I really don't understand how someone can decide that $50,000/year (PITI, after 20% or $150,000 down), to live in either of the two above examples is a good deal. Think about it- for $30,000/year LESS you could rent the same property, leave your $150,000 down invested, and have $30,000/year left over to spend on European vacations, nicer cars, private education for your kids, etc. WTF.
Like the diamond cartel who has everyone thinking they need a diamond engagement ring, the Realtors have got the sheep thinking that ownership, at any cost, is the only accepted/legitimate way to live.