by laxtosnoco » Sun Feb 03, 2008 11:33 am
kpom, you raise a really good point. I saw the same thing in Los Angeles. Prices fell first in outlying areas like Riverside & Lancaster, so many agents that said 'prices will never fall' switched to 'prices will never fall in LA proper.' Now that they've been proven wrong, they're forced to call out very desirable areas like Pasadena and Beverly Hills and point out that prices have not dropped there.
There will inevitably be neighborhoods that fare best in a downturn (and where prices indeed may not fall at all) because neighborhoods transition and become relatively more desirable. But those improving neighborhoods are inevitably offset by those that become less desirable (think Compton, CA or remote Pierce or Snohomish Co, WA). As a buyer, you can try to identify these neighborhoods, but it's a crapshoot.
How many 'up and coming' neighborhoods have been 'up and coming' for 20 years?