Yeah, seems like a no-brainer. There was an article in one of the papers (I can't find the link) a few days ago, advising people to 'update' their houses from the 1970's, poorly decorated time warps they are, by remodeling the kitchen, putting in new lighting fixtures, etc. so that potential buyers aren't scared away.
We looked at a few houses last summer, that obviously had this kind of treatment done. The obvious problem is that you are paying for the owner's dubious taste, and their recent investment, without it really being what you want.
Personally I'd rather have it original and crappy, but in need of updating, vs. new and crappy, but without any functional or otherwise cosmetic issues. Why have to pay for the owners trying to dress something up, and recover the cost?
I hope sellers don't all rush to cover their kitchens in fake granite-colored vinyl, like the places I last looked at, did.