WaMus Last Breathes
WaMu is pretty closely tied to the seattle market with lots of local mortgages made through the S&L giant so I figured this would be a good place to start a thread that follows the final days of WaMu.
Here is the big WaMu story of today. WaMu loses 22 percent of its stock price and potential investors are walking away.
http://biz.yahoo.com/rb/080910/wamu_shares.html
Here is the big WaMu story of today. WaMu loses 22 percent of its stock price and potential investors are walking away.
http://biz.yahoo.com/rb/080910/wamu_shares.html
Comments
"NEW YORK (Reuters) - Standard & Poor's on Monday cut its ratings on Washington Mutual Inc (WM.N: Quote, Profile, Research, Stock Buzz) into junk territory, citing exposures the bank has to bad mortgage debt and volatile markets.
"The company's weak equity pricing in the markets is also a concern, and it increasingly appears that market conditions could overtake credit fundamentals and leave the company with greatly diminished financial flexibility," S&P said in a statement."
http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/id ... 9120080915
NEW YORK (AP) -- The U.S. government has been reaching out to large banks in an effort to organize a buyout of the beleaguered Washington Mutual Inc., according to a person briefed on the talks between regulators and banks.
The obstacle, however, is that "no one knows what's in their books," the person said, speaking on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter. There could be, he said, "a minimum amount of value there.""
http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/080917/washington_mutual.html
Transparency today is even worse than during the S & L crisis. So, what were the Examiners doing while the mess was developing?
Does anyone know the backstory on the departure of the mortgage VP (a real VP) about 4-5 years ago? He lived on BI, then went to AZ, then left WaMu.
I like WaMu banking staff but have heard of no good experiences with their loan departments.
http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/ ... f=business
May have something to do with the FDIC asking for $150 billion for future bank failures.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601170&refer=home&sid=amZxIbcjZISU
"In 2006, IndyMac was the largest provider of mortgages that didn't require borrowers to provide proof of their incomes. And as of mid-September, investors were worried that Washington Mutual Inc., the biggest thrift in the U.S., would be the next bank to go belly up.
A federal takeover of Washington Mutual, which has assets of $310 billion, could cost taxpayers $24 billion more, according to Richard Bove, an analyst at Miami-based Ladenburg Thalmann & Co. "
The after hours price is at 45 cents.
http://biz.yahoo.com/rb/080925/business ... .html?.v=1
A KIRO 7 report - JPMorgan Chase Confirms WaMu Deal
.
JP Morgan Chase Confirms WaMu Deal
.
JPMorgan Chase said it is buying the banks, but not the holding company. All of WaMu deposits and certain liabilities are bought, but not unsecured debt. The $1.9 billion transaction closes immediately and they are now the new owner.....
.
Good call. They have been 'retired' this morning. Of course the FDIC says they did not "fail", but they are picking up the waste no one else will buy. :roll:
http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/080929/wachovia_citigroup.html
So, let's see . . . JPCMWaMu will let their employees know by December first which of the following three categories they will fall into:
1. Those that will be laid off right away.
2. Those that will be retained through the transition period and then laid off.
3. Those that will stay.
Ouch. Not a merry Christmas for a lot of WaMu employees right now. Hard to spend money on presents when you don't know if you'll even have a job.
On the good side, they gave people advanced notice, and apparently are letting people get their resumes in shape. That's certainly better than getting the tap on the shoulder and being handed a cardboard box.
Meanwhile, I'm thinking the Boeing Machinists have chosen the wrong time to go on strike...the 787 wasn't ready for manufacturing anyways, and it's going to be hard for those guys to moonlight while they are out on strike if things draw out. They needed to push it off about 1.5 years.
I said that when they were about to go on strike and I was blasted for it. Hope they saved up.
So they are already gathering data regarding which branches they want to close, who to lay off, etc.
Retained for how long?
What does "most" mean? 95%? 52%?