King County SFR Inventory breaks record!!!

edited June 2007 in Seattle Real Estate
Edit: We broke through this afternoon, we are sitting at 9209 as of 4:00pm

KingCo SFR inventory is getting close to breaking the high-water mark for this century. Sits at 9,173 right now. Record was 9,176 according to Tim's spreadsheet

captureru8.jpg

As far as ancient history goes, I ran the numbers for Snoho/King/N Pierce on the same site. There are about 25,000 listings between SFR/Condos - which is close to a record there too. :D

Comments

  • edited June 2007
    I assume that the inventory numbers we are tracking only include MLS listings? I wonder how much the percentage of properties NOT on MLS might have changed over the years. Is there a higher percentage of non-MLS listings today through vehicles like Redfin, etc?

    Moreover, I wonder if our region might not actually be impacted MORE than other areas of the country with these new real-estate marketing/listing tools seeing as how some of the big new players are local (i.e. Redfin). If so, maybe this could explain why our local stats seem to be lagging the rest of the country at times.

    Maybe if we tracked MLS listing numbers vs actual sales we could get an idea as to whether the MLS numbers were reflected a smaller number of actual sales? But I guess it would be hard to make such a conclusion from the data. If increasing numbers of homes were not being placed on the MLS the statistics would show that we had an increasingly tighter market, with more sales relative to MLS listings.
  • sniglet wrote:
    I assume that the inventory numbers we are tracking only include MLS listings? I wonder how much the percentage of properties NOT on MLS might have changed over the years. Is there a higher percentage of non-MLS listings today through vehicles like Redfin, etc?

    Moreover, I wonder if our region might not actually be impacted MORE than other areas of the country with these new real-estate marketing/listing tools seeing as how some of the big new players are local (i.e. Redfin). If so, maybe this could explain why our local stats seem to be lagging the rest of the country at times.

    I think Redfin and others just use MLS data. I also think FSBO tends to increase as a % of listing at the end of a boom, but not enough to make me spend much time looking into it, especially since I think we are pretty unmistakenly headed to record inventory by the end of the summer. Housingtracker.net shows inventory for Snoho and King counties (and does not include N. Pierce, as far as I can tell, in spite of what they claim) is still going up on average 2% per week, which will add another 30-40% over the summer.

    that should be enough to put a fork in this sucker, no matter how much doesn't show up in the MLS
  • deejayoh wrote:
    I think Redfin and others just use MLS data.

    Do homes listed with Redfin wind up on the MLS?
  • sniglet wrote:
    deejayoh wrote:
    I think Redfin and others just use MLS data.

    Do homes listed with Redfin wind up on the MLS?

    yes, according to their site:
    Redfin Direct for Sellers is a flat-fee home-selling service that combines e-commerce with the support of a local Redfin agent. We list your property in the multiple listing service (MLS), give you a yard-sign and a lockbox, then handle all the negotiations and paperwork, all for $3,000.
  • edited June 2007
    September 2002: 9,176
    June 14, 2007 (4:00 PM): 9,210 (and climbing)

    Also, I've wondered the same thing, about whether the percentage of total listings not on the NWMLS (i.e. - on Craigslist) is actually increasing. I don't know that there would be much difference from 2002 to the present, but I definitely think that when considering the 25,000 numbers being pulled out from the late '80s / early '90s, this could be a non-trivial factor.

    For example, if in the late '80s and early '90s (pre-craigslist) only 1% of sellers sold their home FSBO, but now 5% do, that would mean that 25,000 homes on the MLS then was roughly equal to 25,253 homes on the market total. Now, 25,000 homes on the MLS would be roughly equal to 26,316 homes total.

    Does anyone know of any way to track FSBOs on the market, other than the highly un-scientific Craigslist search (which includes many MLS-listed properties as well)?
  • We Did It!
    Congratulations King County. We've busted through our 7 year record for inventory.

    Seattle really is special. Like on the short bus.

    capturegx0.jpg
  • Is this these tipping point? Is it happening right now? Will we point to today and say this is the day and the hour that the bubble popped? These posts are getting me really excited.
  • Alan wrote:
    Is this these tipping point? Is it happening right now? Will we point to today and say this is the day and the hour that the bubble popped? These posts are getting me really excited.

    smart ass :lol:
  • No smart assery. Just irrational exhuberance.
  • Champagne anyone? :wink:

    Tim is right on the money with his FSBO assumption although the exact number is impossible to pin down as there are so many different avenues for a FSBO to take. Also...on craigslist, there are plenty that are FSBO but are not searchable by using "FSBO" or any of the typical terms. You almost have to stumble across them, but there are plenty.

    There are also "pocket listings". These are listings that are actually for sale, and have realtor representation but not on the MLS. I see them all the time in resale condos that come on the MLS already listed as STI.

    Here is a recent one that I find questionable whether or not it was in fact a pocket listing due to the fact that when it came on the market 5 days ago it was already listed as STI (Yes...I saw it the very first day) and it wasn't a new construction STI where the builders hold back inventory and then list it on the MLS as STI just after selling it.

    http://redfin.com/stingray/do/printable ... -id=817873

    There are currently 6 units listed for sale on the MLS in my building. Today...next door to me, there were a couple of stagers staging a unit that I actually thought was occupied. Of course...being the nice guy that I am...I helped them with a few things that they couldn't reach...one conversation led to another another ultimately leading me to ask how many units were for sale in the building. This is how the conversation went.

    Me: I didn't realize that this unit wasn't occupied...do you know how many units are for sale in the building?

    Stager: There's 12 (I wasn't surprised)

    Me: You mean this building?

    Stager: (with finger over lips) "shhhhhh"

    Me: "Wow, I never would have imagined" (yeah...right...I see how empty the parking garage is)

    I made no mention of pocket listings.

    I have yet to see one of these supposed 6 MIA's on any FSBO site. How much this stager *really* knew is anybody's guess. Time will tell.
  • WRT builders putting condos on the MLS after they are sold here are a few that are listed as of my search of Seattle Condos using the "last day" option as I type this. There are currently 19 listings as of this time.

    129 Warren Ave N 21
    Seattle 98109
    Offer STI
    MLS# 27107068

    129 Warren Ave N 19
    Seattle 98109
    Offer STI
    MLS# 27107022

    129 Warren Ave N 20
    Seattle 98109
    Offer STI
    MLS# 27107061

    312 1st Ave S 7
    Seattle 98104
    Offer STI
    MLS# 27107092

    1120 17th Ave 103
    Seattle 98122
    Offer STI
    MLS# 27107036

    129 Warren Ave N D
    Seattle 98109
    Offer STI
    MLS# 27107046

    312 1st Ave S 1
    Seattle 98104
    Offer STI
    MLS# 27107091

    123 John St 8
    Seattle 98109
    Offer STI
    MLS# 27107049

    so out of 19

    7 come on as STI
    7 are completely empty (no furniture at all)
    2 are seemingly staged (I make no definitive statement on that...hence..."seemingly.
    3 appear to be lived in
Sign In or Register to comment.