Vacant Houses
It takes quite a bit for a self-proclaimed know-it-all, like me, to get perplexed about something, but I am absolutely flummoxed by what I am seeing around here in North Kitsap.
I can think of quite a few houses that sat on the market for some time, sold, and then nobody moves in.
Huh?
Why pay $400K for a home and not move in? It's not like they take a month or so. We are talking 6 months or almost a year.
You see weeds in the yard at hip level, driveways with more dandelions than gravel space, no lights, no furniture, trash in the side yard, dried grass...
These are not bank REOs.
At first, I thought it might be someone that bought without contingencies on the sale of their other (California) house and they can't sell, but this long of a duration doesn't make sense. If they are second homes, why don't they have anyone in them now (July)?
I don't get it.
Any ideas?
I can think of quite a few houses that sat on the market for some time, sold, and then nobody moves in.
Huh?
Why pay $400K for a home and not move in? It's not like they take a month or so. We are talking 6 months or almost a year.
You see weeds in the yard at hip level, driveways with more dandelions than gravel space, no lights, no furniture, trash in the side yard, dried grass...
These are not bank REOs.
At first, I thought it might be someone that bought without contingencies on the sale of their other (California) house and they can't sell, but this long of a duration doesn't make sense. If they are second homes, why don't they have anyone in them now (July)?
I don't get it.
Any ideas?
Comments
That's just insane. About the only thing I can imagine is that the potential loss of selling for market rates is so great that some people are willing to just eat the holding costs indefinitely.
Why spend $400K+ on a home and never move in?