{"id":17378,"date":"2011-10-12T11:49:54","date_gmt":"2011-10-12T18:49:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/seattlebubble.com\/blog\/?p=17378"},"modified":"2011-10-22T23:19:37","modified_gmt":"2011-10-23T06:19:37","slug":"running-the-numbers-on-the-flat-homeowner-deduction","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/seattlebubble.com\/blog\/2011\/10\/12\/running-the-numbers-on-the-flat-homeowner-deduction\/","title":{"rendered":"Running the Numbers on the Flat Homeowner Deduction"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>[Read Part 1: <a href=\"http:\/\/seattlebubble.com\/blog\/2011\/10\/11\/proposal-replace-the-mortgage-interest-deduction-with-a-flat-homeowner-deduction\/\" title=\"Proposal: Replace the Mortgage Interest Deduction with a Flat Homeowner Deduction\">Proposal: Replace the Mortgage Interest Deduction with a Flat Homeowner Deduction<\/a>]<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>In the comments on the proposal I made yesterday, <a href=\"http:\/\/seattlebubble.com\/blog\/2011\/10\/11\/proposal-replace-the-mortgage-interest-deduction-with-a-flat-homeowner-deduction\/#comment-143733\" title=\"Comment by Doug\">Doug asked a reasonable question<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Have you figured out what the deduction would be if you did this, and made it deficit neutral? That would be an interesting exercise.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Good question.  Let&#8217;s do that.<\/p>\n<p>According to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2010\/11\/13\/business\/economy\/13mortgage.html\" title=\"Taking Aim at the Mortgage Tax Break\">various<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.urban.org\/uploadedpdf\/412099-mortgage-deduction-reform.pdf\" title=\"Reforming the Mortgage Interest Deduction (pdf)\">sources<\/a>, the current cost of the mortgage interest deduction is about $131 billion, so let&#8217;s use that as our baseline cost.  According to the <a href=\"http:\/\/goo.gl\/2FVGv\" title=\"American Community Survey: Selected Housing Characteristics: 2005-2009\">U.S. Census Bureau<\/a>, there are about 75 million owner-occupied homes in the country.  So, let&#8217;s do the math.<\/p>\n<p>$131,000,000,000 divided by 75,000,000 gives us about $1,750 per household to work with.  If we assume that the average homeowner is in <a href=\"http:\/\/www.irs.gov\/irb\/2011-02_IRB\/ar16.html\" title=\"IRS tax brackets\">the 28% tax bracket<\/a> ($139,350 \u2013 $212,300 of income for married filing jointly), that translates to a flat homeowner deduction of $6,250.  If the average homeowner is in the 25% tax bracket ($69,000 \u2013 $139,350, which seems more likely to be closer to the nationwide average), we can give them a $7,000 deduction.<\/p>\n<p>So, how does that compare to the mortgage interest deduction?  According to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.realtor.org\/research\/research\/metroprice\" title=\"National Ass. of Realtors: Metropolitan Area Existing-Home Prices and State Existing-Home Sales\">Q2 data from the NAR<\/a> the nationwide median price of homes sold in Q2 of this year was $171,900.  If a buyer purchased said home with just 3.5% down at a 4.5% interest rate, they would pay approximately $7,410 in interest during the first year of their mortgage.  If they put 20% down they pay $6,143 in interest.  If you are in the 25% tax bracket and you deduct $6,143 from your income, your tax savings is $1,536&mdash;about $200 <em>less<\/em> than the flat homeowner deduction I am proposing.  And don&#8217;t forget that the amount of interest you pay decreases every year of your mortgage, consistently shrinking and eventually eliminating your tax savings under the current system.<\/p>\n<p>Obviously people who pay far above the national median price will get a much smaller benefit from this system than they do under today&#8217;s policy, but again, so what?  If you&#8217;ve got the money to pay two or three times more than the average American for a home, why should the government be obligated to subsidize your purchase to a larger degree than for people who can only afford a more modest home?<\/p>\n<p>It looks to me like the numbers work out.  A revenue neutral deduction at $7,000 (~$1,750 tax savings) per owner-occupied home would be fair, or we could give the budget a bit of a boost and just make it a $5,000 deduction (~$1,250 tax savings).  What do you think?  Is my math screwed up, or would this actually work?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>[Read Part 1: Proposal: Replace the Mortgage Interest Deduction with a Flat Homeowner Deduction] In the comments on the proposal I made yesterday, Doug asked a reasonable question: Have you figured out what the deduction would be if you did this, and made it deficit neutral? That would be an interesting exercise. Good question. Let&#8217;s&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[199,206],"tags":[104,397,81,666],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-17378","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-opinion","category-features","tag-government_meddling","tag-homebuying","tag-mortgages","tag-tax-deduction"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v26.2 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Running the Numbers on the Flat Homeowner Deduction \u2022 Seattle Bubble<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/seattlebubble.com\/blog\/2011\/10\/12\/running-the-numbers-on-the-flat-homeowner-deduction\/\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Running the Numbers on the Flat Homeowner Deduction \u2022 Seattle Bubble\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"[Read Part 1: Proposal: Replace the Mortgage Interest Deduction with a Flat Homeowner Deduction] In the comments on the proposal I made yesterday, Doug asked a reasonable question: Have you figured out what the deduction would be if you did this, and made it deficit neutral? That would be an interesting exercise. Good question. Let&#8217;s...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@The_Tim\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@SeattleBubble\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"The Tim\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/seattlebubble.com\/blog\/2011\/10\/12\/running-the-numbers-on-the-flat-homeowner-deduction\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/seattlebubble.com\/blog\/2011\/10\/12\/running-the-numbers-on-the-flat-homeowner-deduction\/\",\"name\":\"Running the Numbers on the Flat Homeowner Deduction \u2022 Seattle Bubble\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/seattlebubble.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-10-12T18:49:54+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2011-10-23T06:19:37+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/seattlebubble.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7de7c0dd14bee1a2c67f7ce86bc4505f\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/seattlebubble.com\/blog\/2011\/10\/12\/running-the-numbers-on-the-flat-homeowner-deduction\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/seattlebubble.com\/blog\/2011\/10\/12\/running-the-numbers-on-the-flat-homeowner-deduction\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/seattlebubble.com\/blog\/2011\/10\/12\/running-the-numbers-on-the-flat-homeowner-deduction\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/seattlebubble.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Running the Numbers on the Flat Homeowner Deduction\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/seattlebubble.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/seattlebubble.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"Seattle Bubble\",\"description\":\"local\u00a0real\u00a0estate\u00a0news, statistics,\u00a0and\u00a0commentary without\u00a0the\u00a0sales\u00a0spin.\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/seattlebubble.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/seattlebubble.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7de7c0dd14bee1a2c67f7ce86bc4505f\",\"name\":\"The Tim\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/seattlebubble.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/37756956c11dcc50d2559761ffa5ee70\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/19e5770990a1681615608091b2de571b10c3e03bbac7d07bb2ae15297ee72fbc?s=96&d=retro&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/19e5770990a1681615608091b2de571b10c3e03bbac7d07bb2ae15297ee72fbc?s=96&d=retro&r=g\",\"caption\":\"The Tim\"},\"description\":\"Tim Ellis is the founder of Seattle Bubble. His background in engineering and computer \/ internet technology, a fondness of data-based analysis of problems, and an addiction to spreadsheets all influence his perspective on the Seattle-area real estate market. Tim also hosts the weekly improv comedy sci-fi podcast Dispatches from the Multiverse.\",\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/SeattleBubble.com\/\",\"http:\/\/facebook.com\/is.totally.pointless\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/The_Tim\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/seattlebubble.com\/blog\/author\/timothyellis\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Running the Numbers on the Flat Homeowner Deduction \u2022 Seattle Bubble","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/seattlebubble.com\/blog\/2011\/10\/12\/running-the-numbers-on-the-flat-homeowner-deduction\/","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Running the Numbers on the Flat Homeowner Deduction \u2022 Seattle Bubble","twitter_description":"[Read Part 1: Proposal: Replace the Mortgage Interest Deduction with a Flat Homeowner Deduction] In the comments on the proposal I made yesterday, Doug asked a reasonable question: Have you figured out what the deduction would be if you did this, and made it deficit neutral? That would be an interesting exercise. Good question. Let&#8217;s...","twitter_creator":"@The_Tim","twitter_site":"@SeattleBubble","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"The Tim","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/seattlebubble.com\/blog\/2011\/10\/12\/running-the-numbers-on-the-flat-homeowner-deduction\/","url":"https:\/\/seattlebubble.com\/blog\/2011\/10\/12\/running-the-numbers-on-the-flat-homeowner-deduction\/","name":"Running the Numbers on the Flat Homeowner Deduction \u2022 Seattle Bubble","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/seattlebubble.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-10-12T18:49:54+00:00","dateModified":"2011-10-23T06:19:37+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/seattlebubble.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7de7c0dd14bee1a2c67f7ce86bc4505f"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/seattlebubble.com\/blog\/2011\/10\/12\/running-the-numbers-on-the-flat-homeowner-deduction\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/seattlebubble.com\/blog\/2011\/10\/12\/running-the-numbers-on-the-flat-homeowner-deduction\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/seattlebubble.com\/blog\/2011\/10\/12\/running-the-numbers-on-the-flat-homeowner-deduction\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/seattlebubble.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Running the Numbers on the Flat Homeowner Deduction"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/seattlebubble.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/seattlebubble.com\/blog\/","name":"Seattle Bubble","description":"local\u00a0real\u00a0estate\u00a0news, statistics,\u00a0and\u00a0commentary without\u00a0the\u00a0sales\u00a0spin.","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/seattlebubble.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/seattlebubble.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7de7c0dd14bee1a2c67f7ce86bc4505f","name":"The Tim","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/seattlebubble.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/37756956c11dcc50d2559761ffa5ee70","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/19e5770990a1681615608091b2de571b10c3e03bbac7d07bb2ae15297ee72fbc?s=96&d=retro&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/19e5770990a1681615608091b2de571b10c3e03bbac7d07bb2ae15297ee72fbc?s=96&d=retro&r=g","caption":"The Tim"},"description":"Tim Ellis is the founder of Seattle Bubble. His background in engineering and computer \/ internet technology, a fondness of data-based analysis of problems, and an addiction to spreadsheets all influence his perspective on the Seattle-area real estate market. Tim also hosts the weekly improv comedy sci-fi podcast Dispatches from the Multiverse.","sameAs":["http:\/\/SeattleBubble.com\/","http:\/\/facebook.com\/is.totally.pointless","https:\/\/x.com\/The_Tim"],"url":"https:\/\/seattlebubble.com\/blog\/author\/timothyellis\/"}]}},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p6wh0F-4wi","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/seattlebubble.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17378","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/seattlebubble.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/seattlebubble.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/seattlebubble.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/seattlebubble.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=17378"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/seattlebubble.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17378\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/seattlebubble.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17378"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/seattlebubble.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=17378"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/seattlebubble.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=17378"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/seattlebubble.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=17378"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}