WaMu is certainly a good candidate for collapse but Lehman, CitiGroup and Wachovia are in a world off pain too. Frankly, all three of them will likely be hitting the dust-bin together, give or take a few months.
This is the official list of troubled banks, released a few days ago...
Bank City State "Texas-ratio"
Colorado Federal Savings Bank Greenwood Village CO 244.8
Eastern Savings Bank, FSB Hunt Valley MD 222.7
Integrity Bank Alpharetta GA 191.6
Ameribank, Inc. Welch WV 153.7
First Priority Bank Bradenton FL 122.6
First Security National Bank Norcross GA 112.1
Magnet Bank Salt Lake City UT 110.4
Security Pacific Bank Los Angeles CA 102.8
First National Bank of Brookfield Brookfield IL 102.1
The State Bank of Lebo Lebo KS 100.6
This is the official list of troubled banks, released a few days ago...
There is no "official list" of troubled banks, there's only speculation. Not saying that those banks aren't troubled, just that nobody really knows for sure. The FDIC won't tell us because they don't want to start bank runs.
There is no "official list" of troubled banks, there's only speculation. Not saying that those banks aren't troubled, just that nobody really knows for sure. The FDIC won't tell us because they don't want to start bank runs.
It's "official" in that the list was released to the major news media, intentionally. The collapse of 150 banks is something the central bankers want, since it will help usher in the next era of world government-style regulation, which will give them even more power.
They sacrifice a little, to gain a bigger piece of control. This time it will be more global.
Remember that anything you hear in the mainstream media is a message coordinated by the central bankers, since they have control over the media in most developed countries.
It's "official" in that the list was released to the major news media, intentionally.
By whom? It's not "official" unless an official says it.
What's an "official" when the real agenda-makers keep themselves intentionally hidden? Do you believe Bush, Sarkozy, and Blair create their own policy? Or perhaps its the central bankers who privately own the US Federal Reserve and have complete control over our currency and economy in the US, and that of other countries... the same central banking families who control the mainstream media and most of the world's economy through the World Bank and IMF. The US government does not go to war and creates no policy unless it comes first from the central bankers who purchased our government by lending our government all of its money. 100% of the federal income tax on your wages goes toward paying the interest back to the private central banking families.
So who is the official, then? The guy with the badge in the media, or the guy who purchased the guy with the badge?
So who is the official, then? The guy with the badge in the media, or the guy who purchased the guy with the badge?
The official would be someone with access to actual inside information on those banks such as a some officer at one of those banks or a spokesperson for the FDIC. I'm not saying that "official" reports are always truthful, or that speculative reports are always wrong. I'm just saying that a report by an organization that only has access to incomplete public information can't be considered official.
Comments
Got junk?
Bank City State "Texas-ratio"
Colorado Federal Savings Bank Greenwood Village CO 244.8
Eastern Savings Bank, FSB Hunt Valley MD 222.7
Integrity Bank Alpharetta GA 191.6
Ameribank, Inc. Welch WV 153.7
First Priority Bank Bradenton FL 122.6
First Security National Bank Norcross GA 112.1
Magnet Bank Salt Lake City UT 110.4
Security Pacific Bank Los Angeles CA 102.8
First National Bank of Brookfield Brookfield IL 102.1
The State Bank of Lebo Lebo KS 100.6
Source: Research Associates of America
It's "official" in that the list was released to the major news media, intentionally. The collapse of 150 banks is something the central bankers want, since it will help usher in the next era of world government-style regulation, which will give them even more power.
They sacrifice a little, to gain a bigger piece of control. This time it will be more global.
Remember that anything you hear in the mainstream media is a message coordinated by the central bankers, since they have control over the media in most developed countries.
What's an "official" when the real agenda-makers keep themselves intentionally hidden? Do you believe Bush, Sarkozy, and Blair create their own policy? Or perhaps its the central bankers who privately own the US Federal Reserve and have complete control over our currency and economy in the US, and that of other countries... the same central banking families who control the mainstream media and most of the world's economy through the World Bank and IMF. The US government does not go to war and creates no policy unless it comes first from the central bankers who purchased our government by lending our government all of its money. 100% of the federal income tax on your wages goes toward paying the interest back to the private central banking families.
So who is the official, then? The guy with the badge in the media, or the guy who purchased the guy with the badge?
The official would be someone with access to actual inside information on those banks such as a some officer at one of those banks or a spokesperson for the FDIC. I'm not saying that "official" reports are always truthful, or that speculative reports are always wrong. I'm just saying that a report by an organization that only has access to incomplete public information can't be considered official.