Recent articles about Seattle home prices

edited May 2007 in Seattle Real Estate
So, yesterday at CNNMoney Diana Olick wrote an article regarding the strong Seattle housing market. I have read similar articles on other websites as well. Portland OR is also lumped in there, with a quote from some idiot who is going to try to flip their house because they don't have to worry about a downturn. Just wanted to post this article, showing where Seattle stands in regards to inventory. Now, seattle being the bustling metropolis that it is, should have a high percentage of inventory when compared to huge cities such as Chicago and the Bay area. Right?
http://www.realestatejournal.com/buysel ... gerty.html
Just to keep you all in reality.

Comments

  • We could be in for a harder landing than I would have guessed.
    biliruben wrote:
    20070510-hagerty.gif
  • Inventory is still very tight by historical standards.

    KC Res April 2007: 7,649

    KC Res April 2004: 7,637

    KC Res April 2003: 8,856

    KC Res April 2002: 7,639

    So we're in for the sort of correction we saw in those years, which was zilch. Hosues kept selling and prices appreciated despite the same or more inventory.
  • So we're in for the sort of correction we saw in those years, which was zilch. Hosues kept selling and prices appreciated despite the same or more inventory.

    But the years prior to 2007 you posted (and didn't post) all had the help of easy credit to keep the inventory manageable. Now, as you said in a previous topic, the mortgage industry has finally corrected itself and has totally cleansed itself of all rotten eggs. What will compensate for the loss of easy credit now? It also looks as if the rate of increase of inventory is increasing this year compared to prior years (from data I've eyeballed).
  • Meshugy,

    Obviously the supply is still a limiting factor but I don't see the controversy. We're seeing a rapid increase in inventory. If that trend escalates, the market will flatten. As the market flattens, there will be fewer speculative buyers.* That's when the market softens for real, just like every other comparable "bubble proof" market has around the country. I expect to see it happen by March of 2008 or before. Did you say you were willing to bet against that?

    Of course, if the current talk of a recession is right and the overall economic picture turns gloomy at that same moment, we could be in for a real drop. Otherwise, just be a slow flattening, but one that could last for a number of years.

    Quick: Let's assume there's no bubble but the market just flattens right out. If you own your 500K house in Seattle outright today, how much money do you lose between now and 2015 by not selling the house and renting instead?

    My answer: Somewhere between $30,000 and $230,000 dollars, depending on how well you do on your other investments.

    *(How many qualify as speculative buyers? At this point, given the rent/price ratios and other fundamentals, basically all home buyers in the area are speculative buyers - meaning they think the price will be higher next year as if they were buying corn or wheat futures.)
  • meshugy wrote:
    Inventory is still very tight by historical standards....So we're in for the sort of correction we saw in those years, which was zilch. Hosues kept selling and prices appreciated despite the same or more inventory.

    Past performance has never been nor will ever be a guarantee of future returns. :P
  • Windermere shows 10,878 listings (house & condo) in King County as of today; up 8% from the beginning of May. Of course that doesn't include the condos flooding onto the market, including 2 conversions below me.

    Bubbles tend to burst - that's why we call them bubbles. :roll:
  • By historical standards, Meshugys house is worth about $170K.

    Sale History
    04/15/1997: $169,950
    No other sale data is available
Sign In or Register to comment.