Microsoft neighbhorhoods still selling like hot cakes?

Most listings in neighbhorhoods prefered by Microsoft employees seem to be still selling like hot cakes (even in the $600k+ market)? Wonder if these neighbhorhoods will ever see a slowdown?

Any thoughts on why this is the case? I don't think Microsoft is hiring as agressively as they did over the past couple of years.

Comments

  • My guess would be that the moron rato is a bit high.
  • What exactly would be a "Microsoft neighborhood"? The people I know there live all over, from West Seattle to North Bend to Duvall to Everett and all points between.
  • What exactly would be a "Microsoft neighborhood"? The people I know there live all over, from West Seattle to North Bend to Duvall to Everett and all points between.

    On the eastside, it seems like the preferred areas are Bellevue, Redmond, Sammamish, Issaquah, Kirkland, etc. Typically fairly new homes (less than 8+ years old) tend to preferred. Note that this purely my preception -- not backed by any data.
  • Many eastisde homes still seem to be getting multiple offers. We saw a home over the weekend --- the agent called today to tell us that the home got 10 offers (listied at $489K & sold for $515k). This was for a 20+ year old, 1500+ sqft SF home in Sammamish.

    The eastside market seems to have really taken off in the past 3-4 weeks. Though, I'm clueless as to why. Any thoughts/insights are highly appreciated.
  • Relocation season is coming up. These could be people who are in the pipline for a move to Redmond (Microsoft Relocation) and want a house ready at the end of the school year to move the rest of their family.
  • ayles wrote:
    Relocation season is coming up. These could be people who are in the pipline for a move to Redmond (Microsoft Relocation) and want a house ready at the end of the school year to move the rest of their family.

    That sounds like a possible reason. Approx, when is the relocation/school season expected to end?
  • The business is super cyclical but typically things really slow down after mid september.

    In addition to the people waiting for their kids to finish school, there is also a large influx of college grady. But most of them are not purchasing.
  • Don't forget that Microsoft relocates people mainly from New York, San Francisco/Silicon Valley, and LA... as well as cities around the world like London, etc. These are the places with the most skilled workers, and their housing prices are sky high. If someone has paid off (or bought in early enough) on a house that's worth $1.2M over the past 10 years in Silicon Valley, there's almost nothing in Redmond that I can't overbid for, quite easily, and probably care more about a good school district for my kids than the extra $100K, especially if the house is all paid off and all I'm looking at are property taxes, etc.

    Its not so much the Microsoft salary that is creating weird dynamics as their habit of pulling people from places that are really overpriced.

    On the other hand, this is why Google is building their Kirkland campus. Its cheaper for them to build a campus here for their Seattle (ex-Microsoft) employees than to pay those employees enough to make it worth their while to move down and buy in to the way overpriced Bay Area market. Especially since the SF market will probably not crash nearly as much -or at all - compared to Southern California or how other places currently are, since they really are "special"....
  • corey wrote:
    Don't forget that Microsoft relocates people mainly from New York, San Francisco/Silicon Valley, and LA... as well as cities around the world like London, etc. These are the places with the most skilled workers, and their housing prices are sky high. If someone has paid off (or bought in early enough) on a house that's worth $1.2M over the past 10 years in Silicon Valley, there's almost nothing in Redmond that I can't overbid for, quite easily, and probably care more about a good school district for my kids than the extra $100K, especially if the house is all paid off and all I'm looking at are property taxes, etc.

    Its not so much the Microsoft salary that is creating weird dynamics as their habit of pulling people from places that are really overpriced.

    On the other hand, this is why Google is building their Kirkland campus. Its cheaper for them to build a campus here for their Seattle (ex-Microsoft) employees than to pay those employees enough to make it worth their while to move down and buy in to the way overpriced Bay Area market. Especially since the SF market will probably not crash nearly as much -or at all - compared to Southern California or how other places currently are, since they really are "special"....

    Very good point.
  • corey wrote:
    Don't forget that Microsoft relocates people mainly from New York, San Francisco/Silicon Valley, and LA... as well as cities around the world like London, etc.

    Exactly! I've been trying to convince Tim of this but he insists that there needs to be exact correlation of median income to median house price. But that theory is complete mishegas because of the large # of people moving here from high equity markets. Even if their job doesn't pay that well, which it usually does, they still have massive buying power because of all the equity.
  • We also relocate a ton of people from around the country that can't sell, or that have lower housing values... Makes for some tough conversations when somebody wants a house like they had "back home" and the price is 3 times that here.
  • ayles wrote:
    We also relocate a ton of people from around the country that can't sell, or that have lower housing values... Makes for some tough conversations when somebody wants a house like they had "back home" and the price is 3 times that here.

    That's what condos are for....
  • meshugy wrote:

    That's what condos are for....

    so a family should get a subpar 400k 1br condo instead of a subpar 500k 3br house?
  • They definitely are not for families with two kids, pets, and cars etc...

    Plus one of the hot buzz words in my office right now is "loss on sale" which is a reimbursement paid to individuals who have to sell at a loss at origin. I have been here 5 years and only in the last few months have I ever heard it mentioned.
  • Exactly! I've been trying to convince Tim of this but he insists that there needs to be exact correlation of median income to median house price. But that theory is complete mishegas because of the large # of people moving here from high equity markets. Even if their job doesn't pay that well, which it usually does, they still have massive buying power because of all the equity.

    Meshugy:

    For your theory to be accurate, the influx of equity-rich transplants has got to be relatively large to influence the median. Do you have data, or is your opinion just speculation? Are there really that many equity-rich Microsoft employees moving here?
  • I would argue they are equity poor. That could be a symptom of trying to keep up with joneses, poor money mgmt, ect the list goes on and on.

    I see a lot of people that make a lot of money but at the same time have none. I am talking so little money that they cannot afford incidental expenses they have to pay up front (yet get reimbursed). These are people making double or more than median Seattle income.
  • meshugy wrote:
    corey wrote:
    Don't forget that Microsoft relocates people mainly from New York, San Francisco/Silicon Valley, and LA... as well as cities around the world like London, etc.

    Exactly! I've been trying to convince Tim of this but he insists that there needs to be exact correlation of median income to median house price. But that theory is complete mishegas because of the large # of people moving here from high equity markets. Even if their job doesn't pay that well, which it usually does, they still have massive buying power because of all the equity.

    And that has been addressed on several occasions, but again, you don't listen. and to comment "that's what condos are for"? idiotic.

    Yes, people came up here with lots of equity, they WERE able to sell their home and put down a large dp and have little to finance. Hence price increases. BUT WAKE UP SHRUG! those days are OVER!!! they can't sell their damn house. do you get it? And even if they can sell their house, and say they bought it more than 3 years ago and have a decent amount of equity, they are getting to the point that they see what is happening where they came from and see the same thing happening here, hence, they would have to be complete MORONS to think buying would be a good idea at this time. I know of Several Cali's that have moved up here and are putting off buying because of the sting they took, and they have plenty of euquity, but try sitting on your house for 10 months waiting for it to sell. You are a lot less likely to jump back in under these circumstances.

    Hence the delay in Seattle taking a dump. but it will happen.
  • We are one of those families with 2.5 kids who relocated (apparently out of season) late last year. We didn't relocate from any of the aforementioned higher priced areas, and neither did any of the many people we know who relocated here (and all work in tech jobs)

    We have substantial equity and decent tech management salary, and yes we could easily afford houses in Redmond, Kirkland, Bellevue, Sammamish.....; although there are also many we can not afford. Some programmers who had phone interviews declined to go further once they realized that they worked in places where they could get 2 acres with a huge house for under 300,000 and that wouldn't buy a shed here.

    Having previously lived in Vancouver Canada and watched real estate burst not once, but 3 times......we are quite happy renting and waiting. I know people who overspent, interest rates went up, they had to sell at substantially less than they bought for and spent many years paying off debts and owned nothing in the end.

    When we first arrived here, everywhere we went we noticed huge signs advertising new housing developments, tons of houses being built, lots of signs advertising houses for sale, for rent.... Looking through all the local real estate websites, there are tons of houses up for sale that are empty.

    Currently, it seems like most of the activity in single family houses tends to be in the lower price ranges, potentially by people stretching to buy at the upper reaches of their affordable levels. It maybe that some houses are selling well, but I know one person who just bought a newer house in the lower belowe $450K in Duvall, while similar houses are being advertised for $550K. If the prices on huge glut of houses in the more expensive categories starts to fall, it will affect prices all the way down.
  • WetCoaster wrote:
    Having previously lived in Vancouver Canada and watched real estate burst not once, but 3 times......we are quite happy renting and waiting. I know people who overspent, interest rates went up, they had to sell at substantially less than they bought for and spent many years paying off debts and owned nothing in the end.
    Wow! I guess you have a lot of wisdom to share after going through 3 bust cycles. Typically, how long did it take the Vancouver market to hit the bottom, after a bust?
  • The first two were quite quick; but the third was much slower.

    First cycle: Prices increased 119% from 1979 to 1981 and declined back to pre-boom level by 1985 (although the largest part of the drop occured by 1982)

    Second cycle: Prices rose 69% from 1986 to 1990 and declined abruptly by 16% by 1991

    Third cycle: Prices rose 38% from 1991 to 1994 and declined 24% by 2001

    Since 2001 prices have gone up about 100%


    I just read today that for every house sold, 2 are being listed. I also read on a forum that realtors have been selling houses to each other recently.
  • Wonder if today's strong results from Microsoft will have an impact on the local RE market.
  • EastSider wrote:
    Wonder if today's strong results from Microsoft will have an impact on the local RE market.

    Yeah, all those guys worried about an emminent layoff are going to be psyched to buy now.

    Unless they were waiting for the stock to break 30 before cashing out options, probably won't have a direct effect.

    It is worth noting though that AMZN, SBUX, MSFT and BA all posted favorable results and saw their stocks climb. Then again, WM posted some questionable results and is also up since mid April.
  • Meshugy: I think you have a good point. People's experience with high-flying markets in other places made them dive in here without blinking. Until now.

    That same out-of-town experience is going to come into play in 2007, but with very different results. As markets drop elsewhere fewer newcomers are going to believe the "Seattle is different" story, since it's the same story that was told in nearly every high-flying market in the country. Before the drop.
  • Microsoft considering a buyout of Yahoo (for $50B???) ? This could be a very risky move, and potentially have an impact on the local RE market.

    Reports: Microsoft Pursuing Yahoo
  • yeah. buy a failing search company

    Microsoft down 2%
    yahoo up 16%

    market loves it. not
  • This Yahoo buyout is odd. As has been pointed out when this came up last year, even if MSFT buys up every search engine besides GOOG, they'll still have a minority share of the market. How they could turn a handful of underperforming divisions into something that is even gaining on GOOG is unclear.

    Microsoft doesn't lack money or market share in this area, they're lacking in innovation. Buying up a few "also-ran's" seems pointless. There's no magic GOOG killer like there was for Netscape.
Sign In or Register to comment.