how easy is it for lenders to just "walk away"?
Does anyone have an idea as to how easy it is for a lender to just "walk away" and avoid taking on the liability for a property where the value is less than what they can hope to make from it after deducting expenses?
Calculated risk pointed out that some lenders are declining to even file for foreclosure on defaults and it got me wondering as to how this kind of thing would work.
http://calculatedrisk.blogspot.com/2008/01/jingle-liens.html
Maybe a lender could just decide not for foreclose but not actually foregive the loan in the hope that at some point in the future the place might appreciate: kind of like a call option with no risk. Or would this kind of hands-off approach (using the outstanding mortgage as an option) expire after some period of time, allowing the municipality to sieze the place for back-taxes, maintenance fees, etc?
Calculated risk pointed out that some lenders are declining to even file for foreclosure on defaults and it got me wondering as to how this kind of thing would work.
http://calculatedrisk.blogspot.com/2008/01/jingle-liens.html
Maybe a lender could just decide not for foreclose but not actually foregive the loan in the hope that at some point in the future the place might appreciate: kind of like a call option with no risk. Or would this kind of hands-off approach (using the outstanding mortgage as an option) expire after some period of time, allowing the municipality to sieze the place for back-taxes, maintenance fees, etc?
Comments
There are a growing number of cases around the country where homes have been completely abandoned by both owner and lender. I wonder what happens in these situations? Can't the city just take ownership of the property at some point if no one is paying fines or taxes?
http://www.redding.com/news/2008/mar/03/abandoned-homes-a-blight-risk/
Does the person purchasing the lien get the property free and clear of all other encumberances? For example, what if the original lender shows up years down the road asking for mortgage payments?
Or would all the other lien holders wind up foregoing their rights through a failure to act when the tax lien was placed on the property?
Anyone with a lien has an incentive to make sure property taxes are paid.
I am sure the laws vary from state to state. It sounds like some states handle unpaid tax liens by allowing the lien holder to go through the foreclosure process. In that case the property would be sold through public auction and the lien holder would get the proceeds.
I am pretty sure that AZ allows the lien holder to directly take ownership. I do not know what the laws in WA are or even how tax liens are sold here.
I don't know what LID's are. Also, the state is unable to void federal claims.
At the bottom of that page is a link to all tax foreclosure properties:
http://www.metrokc.gov/finance/treasury ... laimer.asp
There are currently no properties under tax foreclosure (most likely because people contact the owners and buy them out prior to auction).