Seattle Bubble

News & discussion about real estate & the housing bubble in the Seattle area.

Seattle Bubble - News & discussion about real estate & the housing bubble in the Seattle area.

Entries Tagged as 'Smith_Tower'

Weekend News Roundup

By The Tim on July 6th, 2009 at 8:00 AM · 18 Comments

Lots of local real estate related news over the weekend worth mentioning. Here’s a brief roundup of the stories you might be interested in.

Let’s kick things off with some good news via Aubrey Cohen at the P-I. Looks like the state’s irresponsible plan to pre-distribute $8,000 tax credit is dead in the water, thanks to the IRS.

SeattlePI.com: State clarifies state of tax credit loan plan

There has been a lot of information circulating in the past few months regarding a possible Tax Credit bridge loan program that would have potentially “monetized” the currently available $8,000 federal tax credit for qualified first time homebuyers. This potential program would have allowed these first time homebuyers to actually come to the closing table with their credit in hand, as opposed to waiting to have these funds available until after closing.

On June 2, 2009, the IRS formally declined this request citing long-standing regulations requiring refunds be paid only to the person or persons filing the tax return. Due to significant financial risks associated with the Tax Credit bridge loan program and recent guidance published from the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Commission discontinued the development of the Tax Credit bridge loan program.

Next up, a bit of humor from SmartMoney.com, who you may recall last October labeled Seattle as “in the best shape for a rebound.”

SmartMoney.com: 5 Housing Markets That Have Further to Fall

In the Northwest, median home prices are down but they remain above the national average. Portland’s prices fell 2.1% in March. Home prices in Seattle were down 2.0% for the month.

The Pacific Northwest bubble was among the last to burst, which could mean the market will be among the last to recover.

And here’s a handful of additional stories for you to digest this post-holiday Monday morning…

Seattle Times: Landmark Smith Tower mostly vacant

Thanks to the recession and Washington Mutual’s collapse, there’s no shortage of vacant office space in downtown Seattle. One of the emptiest buildings also is one of the region’s best-known and most-loved.

The 95-year-old Smith Tower, once the tallest building west of Chicago, is at least 70 percent vacant, according to online listings and commercial real-estate databases.

Walton Street bought the 257,000-square-foot Smith Tower for $43 million in April 2006, when the market was nearing its peak and the tower was 92 percent occupied, according to its previous owner.

Less than a year later the new owner sought — and ultimately received — city approval to convert the entire building to condos, a move prompted, in part, by the impending departure of the tower’s two largest office tenants.

When the downtown condo market began to cool later in 2007, Walton Street scaled back its condo-conversion plans to just the top 12 stories.

But it hasn’t pursued permits for that scenario for more than a year, city records indicate.

The Smith Tower has always been my favorite building in downtown Seattle. It’s a shame to see it sit unused like this. I actually like the idea of converting it to condos, although I’m not sure there would be all that much appeal to live in Pioneer Square…

Seattle Times: Lynnwood’s City Bank gets tighter scrutiny

City Bank of Lynnwood, hurt by heavy lending to developers and homebuilders, on Thursday became the latest local bank to submit to tighter oversight from federal and state regulators.

It signed an agreement, called a cease-and-desist order, that requires City Bank to shrink the volume of nonperforming loans and foreclosed real estate it’s carrying on its books; reduce its dependence on brokered deposits; increase its capital levels; and make other operational and organizational changes.

Puget Sound Business Journal: Lexas believes condo buyers will show up

Call him a contrarian. Escala developer Eric Midby expects to move ahead with a pair of high-rise hotel and condominium towers at a time when nearly every other developer has decided to sit out this market because of the recession.

Midby, a principal and development manager at Lexas Cos., is betting that by getting the company’s next condo project under way now, he can exploit a two-year gap in the delivery of new condominium units in downtown Seattle that starts next year.

“We firmly believe that Seattle very soon is going to have a shortage of housing, that all the units in downtown will fill up and there will be continued demand,” Midby said.

Seattle Times: Property taxes: Appeals shoot up is King, Snohomish Counties

Homeowners complained in near-record numbers about high valuations last year. Appeals of property values shot up more than threefold in King County, from 3,767 in 2007 to 13,156 in 2008. The last time there were that many appeals was 1991, when a sluggish real-estate market followed several years of rapidly climbing home values.

Appeals also increased in Snohomish County last year — from 1,688 to 2,347.

Appeals resulted in lowered values about half the time in King County and about a third of the time in Snohomish County, according to the assessors.

I remind any Seattle Bubble readers that are considering appealing their assessment that S-Crow posted a useful “how-to” on this process that would be a good starting point.

West Seattle Blog: City Council townhouse talk in West Seattle: Less (rules) is more?

…As in, less (fewer) restrictions could mean more variety in housing units. Or, so said the architects from whom City Councilmember Sally Clark and her Planning, Land Use and Neighborhoods Committee heard at Youngstown Arts Center Tuesday night.

The West Seattle meeting addressed only a slice of the Multi-Family Code Update, townhouses and “low-rise” zoning in particular.

And finally, here’s a national story on the subject of “strategic defaults,” which we have been discussing lately.
Wall Street Journal: New Evidence on the Foreclosure Crisis

What is really behind the mushrooming rate of mortgage foreclosures since 2007? The evidence from a huge national database containing millions of individual loans strongly suggests that the single most important factor is whether the homeowner has negative equity in a house — that is, the balance of the mortgage is greater than the value of the house. This means that most government policies being discussed to remedy woes in the housing market are misdirected.

…the focus on subprimes ignores the widely available industry facts (reported by the Mortgage Bankers Association) that 51% of all foreclosed homes had prime loans, not subprime, and that the foreclosure rate for prime loans grew by 488% compared to a growth rate of 200% for subprime foreclosures.

…although only 12% of homes had negative equity, they comprised 47% of all foreclosures.

Yow.

→ 18 CommentsCategories: News
Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Condo Conversions and Increasing Density

By The Tim on July 19th, 2007 at 9:48 AM · 19 Comments

There have been a few mildly-interesting articles in the last couple days on the subject of condo conversion projects and Seattle’s increasing density. Here are a few highlights.

Aubrey Cohen updates us on the status of the proposal to condo-ify the Smith Tower:

Owners of the Smith Tower have one of two key city approvals needed to convert the Pioneer Square landmark from offices into condominiums.

Walton Street Capital, a private real estate investment company based in Chicago, filed an application with the city in February to build 150 homes in Seattle’s first skyscraper, which was completed at 506 Second Ave. in 1914. On Monday, city planner Lisa Rutzick approved the plan with several conditions, including that it get a required approval from the Pioneer Square Preservation Board.

The developers still haven’t decided, [Walton Street operating partner Michael Allmon] said Wednesday. “We’re probably two months away from making a decision. But nothing’s happened at this point to keep us from looking.”

Pioneer Square’s neighborhood plan, which was last updated in 2003, calls for more housing, particularly private development for middle-income residents, to help revitalize the area.

I’m as starry-eyed as anyone when I think of how cool it would be to live in a building with that much character, but somehow I doubt that the condos they’re planning will fit the bill of “development for middle-income residents.” Also, while the building itself has desirable character, the same cannot be said of the surrounding neighborhood. I’ve spent some time on the streets around there at night, giving out jackets and coffee to homeless people, and even though we stayed in groups of at least half a dozen, it still felt pretty dangerous. There are some real freaky people that wander the streets of Pioneer Square at night.

Also on the subject of condo conversions was a story from Amy Rolph about one man’s quest to prevent an old church building from going condo:

Sure, it would be great to live in a converted turn-of-the-century church. But it would be even better if that historic building could be enjoyed by music-lovers across the Puget Sound region, right?

For months, Dan Fievez has been posing that question to anyone who might lend a sympathetic ear or, more important, a sympathetic check made out to the tune of $100,000.

Fievez wants to turn the First Church of Christ Scientist on Capitol Hill into a performing arts center that small opera companies, chamber groups and orchestras around the Seattle area could call home. With its cathedral-inspired sanctuary and seating capacity of 1,300, the 101-year-old building at 1519 E. Denny Way fits the profile of what a community music center should ideally be, Fievez said.

But there are a few things standing in the way of his vision: The church, which its dwindling congregation vacated last year and then sold, is being converted into townhomes. The new owners are willing to sell for less than half of what the returns on the homes could be, but the asking price would still tally up to about $4 million — $100,000 of which would be required upfront in earnest money.

How generous of the developer. I’m sure their willingness to consider other options has nothing to do with the inevitable explosion of condo inventory in Seattle over the next few years. Nah.

Lastly, Joni Balter rambles about Seattle’s “growth” in a column that leaves me asking, “what’s your point?”

As part of the neighborhood-planning effort, certain neighborhoods agreed to accept higher density in exchange for urban amenities, such as traffic circles, parks and libraries. Seattle is bracing for another 100,000 residents over the next 15 to 20 years.

In a good news/bad news conundrum, Seattle’s real-estate market is still humming while sales in other parts of the country are slowing.

That means a host of developers and would-be homeowners are still willing to pay $800,000 or more for a teardown. There is a cost to a neighborhood if the teardown’s replacement overwhelms all the other more modestly sized homes with noise, construction dust and view-blocking megahomes.

There it is again: that knotting, clenching, uncomfortable feeling. Will our city feel as livable after all the real-estate money sloshes around and maxes out so many comfortably sized lots in neighborhoods where scale and taste used to mean something?

New laws will help. But some things can’t be fixed. More people means traffic keeps getting worse all the time. Home prices are soaring into the stratosphere. Quality of life here remains quite good but you can feel some of our world-famous livability ebbing. Our angst is palpable.

So, we need more laws to help us get comfortable with McMansions? Sorry Joni, I don’t follow. What do McMansions have to do with growth and density, anyway? It seems to me that they’re counter-productive on the density front. I can understand the logic behind filling Seattle with townhomes, but 2,000+ square foot homes on city lots seem to have more to do with builder profit than with increasing density. But maybe that’s just me.

(Aubrey Cohen, Seattle P-I, 07.18.2007)
(Amy Rolph, Seattle P-I, 07.18.2007)
(Joni Balter, Seattle Times, 07.19.2007)

→ 19 CommentsCategories: Uncategorized
Tags: , , , ,

Latest Condo Conversion: Smith Tower?

By The Tim on February 22nd, 2007 at 4:58 PM · 11 Comments

If the owner of the Smith Tower gets what they want, you can add yet another condo to dozens already planned for downtown’s future. Walton Street Capital is hoping to convert the Smith Tower into condos:

Ninety-three years after Pioneer Square’s Smith Tower was built as an elegant business address, its new owner hopes to turn the 38-story landmark into residential condominiums.

Chicago-based Walton Street Capital filed papers with the city Wednesday to begin what could be a months-long process of getting approval to redo the tower as housing.

It seems that living in old buildings is more charming — and practical — than working in them.

“We bought it, frankly, as an office building, and it wasn’t until we found out we would lose the two largest tenants in the building that we really looked carefully at what our options were,” [Walton Street representative Michael] Allmon said. “We’ve just become excited about the possibility of changing its use.

“It’s important that all possible current and future uses be explored in the preservation of this iconic tower,” he added.

Allmon believes a condominium-ized Smith Tower would have little trouble competing with the dozen or so swank condo developments under construction in downtown Seattle.

“I think this really is a category unto itself,” he said.

I personally think it would be pretty awesome to live in the Smith Tower (that is of course if I worked anywhere near downtown). It’s always been one of my favorite buildings in Seattle. I made a crude LEGO model of it (crude compared to this one), and it is featured prominently in the only painting my wife and I own.

On the other hand, they’ll most likely be ridiculously expensive luxury condos, far out of reach for most people, and besides that, does downtown Seattle really need yet another tower full of condos, on top of the 49 others in the works? Really?

(Amy Martinez & Elizabeth Rhodes, Seattle Times, 02.22.2007)

→ 11 CommentsCategories: Uncategorized
Tags: , ,