Time for the housing market to detox from low mortgage rates

Pepperidge Farm remembersRemember way back in 2010, when the Associated Press declared that “the era of record-low mortgage rates is over”?

Or a few years later in 2013 when 4% mortgage rates were widely described as “soaring”?

Pepperidge Farm remembers.

Mortgage rates have been a frequent topic of discussion on these pages over the years since they have such a large impact on the housing market. Here are a few of our headlines over the years…

April 2012: Will Higher Interest Rates Kill the Housing Market?

September 2015: Affordability Will Be Destroyed if Interest Rates Increase

September 2020: Plunging mortgage rates held off a Seattle home price crash

Ten years ago I said that “eventually rates will climb back up above six percent” but that I didn’t expect it to happen “for at least another four years.” Even the timeline of that prediction was far too short, but to be fair it was in a post titled People Stink at Predicting Interest Rates and people includes this guy.

30-year mortgage rates since 2005

In my opinion, the absurdly low mortgage rates of the past 10+ years have basically held the housing market in a perpetual state of artificial demand inflation. The Federal Reserve has been the drug dealer, continuallly supplying the market with cocaine in increasingly higher doses while we all just kept coming back for more every time we saw the slightest hint that we may be coming down off that high.

But now, after more than a decade of rates under 5%, we’re finally going to see how a more “normal” mortgage rate will impact the housing market. It’s finally time to detox, and we don’t get to come down easy—we’re going cold turkey.

To try to get some idea of what this might look like, it may be informative to review the 2010 post Do Rising Interest Rates Lead to Falling Home Prices? Here’s the tl;dr – Yes, there have been times when a spike in mortgage rates led to a decline in inflation-adjusted home prices. Most notably the period between 1979 and 1985, when rates shot up nine points and inflation-adjusted home prices fell 20%.

30-year mortgage rates since 1971

A lot of factors are different now than they were in the early ’80s. For one thing, home prices going into that period were not obscenely inflated the way they are now. Our current situation is also very different from 2008, when far too many homebuyers were leveraged to the hilt with liar loans and interest-only mortgages that they could only “afford” if prices kept rising in perpetuity. It’s impossible to predict exactly what the coming housing recession will look like, but I am fairly confident that real home prices will not be able to remain at the astronomical heights they have climbed to over the past few years with mortgage rates back above 6%.

We are already seeing a lot of weeping & gnashing of teeth about “high mortgage rates” and the Fed “killing the housing market” but in my opinion the mistake was holding rates so absurdly low for so absurdly long. Mortgage rates eventually going back to the 6-8% range was inevitable.

In closing, here is a mortgage rates haiku:

Seems it may be time
to finally pay the price
for keeping rates low.

If you’re a Seattle Bubble Member, the full data for these charts and more are uploaded to the members-only data repository.

Want to join a conversation about this or other local real estate topics? We’re on Twitter at @SeattleBubble.

3.44 avg. rating (68% score) - 18 votes
King County Affordability Index

So… what the heck is going on with the Seattle housing market?

Since we’ve been gone for so long, I thought I’d start back up with somewhat of an overview post. Let’s just take a look at what’s going on in the Seattle-area (King County) housing market recently.

One of the biggest topics on everybody’s mind lately is home prices, so let’s start there…

Eliminating single-family zoning is a good idea, and Christopher Kirk’s Seattle Times editorial is a steaming pile of garbage

An editorial by Christopher Kirk in the Seattle Times yesterday was so stupid I had no choice but to finally come back here and respond.

Here’s the link: Statewide rezoning of single-family neighborhoods is a terrible idea

Now, before we start it’s worth noting that this piece is described as a “Special to The Times” and the author is not a journalist. He’s not an economist, either. He’s also not an urban planner, and as you’ll see he’s obviously not a historian. He’s an architect whose primary accomplishments listed on his bio attached to the piece are having “served on public historic preservation and design review boards.”

So with that context, let’s get into it…

Around the Sound: Still a dismal market for buyers everywhere

Let’s take a look at our stats for the local regions outside of the King/Snohomish core. Here’s your October update to our “Around the Sound” statistics for Pierce, Kitsap, Thurston, Island, Skagit, and Whatcom counties…