Seattle Bubble

News & discussion about real estate & the housing bubble in the Seattle area.

Seattle Bubble - News & discussion about real estate & the housing bubble in the Seattle area.

Entries Tagged as 'townhomes'

Northshore Townhomes: A Case Study in Bubble Mania Development

By The Tim on July 23rd, 2009 at 9:00 AM · 48 Comments

Northshore Townhomes Sandwich Signs

Regular readers may recall past mentions on these pages of Northshore Townhomes, an 86-unit townhome complex in my north Kenmore neighborhood.

The story of Northshore Townhomes is a classic tale of bubble mania. The 6-acre parcel was purchased in 2002 for $1 million by well-known local developer Mike Mastro (via an LLC), but development did not begin in earnest until 2006, breaking ground in the midst of the real estate frenzy (condo prices were up over 24% year-over-year in November that year).

Now, Kenmore is nice, but it’s not exactly near the top of most people’s lists when they are thinking about where they want to live around Seattle. Is Kenmore really the best market in which to build 86 new townhomes priced $280,000 to $400,000, with a feature list that includes “the finest finishes throughout” and “chic cabanas with table, bar, and rollout lounges”? And even if Kenmore is a good place for such a development, does it make sense to put it half a block from a major auction house? Obviously not, but during the bubble everything was being snatched up with bidding wars as soon as it came on the market, so in the mind of the developer it was probably a no-lose proposition.

As construction on Northshore neared completion in early 2008, the marketing began to ramp up. A flashy website came online, sandwich boards were strewn about the neighborhood, billboards were placed all along Bothell / Lake City Way, and promotions were launched. Everything looked great, except for one thing… There were no buyers.

Northshore Townhomes | Kenmore, WA
Northshore Townhomes | Kenmore, WA

As 2008 wound to a close, not a single unit had sold. Signs and online offers advertising units for rent began to pop up along side the still-listed units that were for sale. Of course, this simply provided an even greater disincentive to any possible buyers.

By early 2009, the days of speculators gobbling up properties in hopes unloading on a greater fool for a massive profit were long gone, and Northshore had been left in the lurch. Mastro finally completely gave up trying to sell the townhomes, and the entire complex became rentals. According to a May deed of trust (pdf) filed with King County, Mastro’s company owes $23.6 million on the property. With rents at the complex averaging around $1,700, it will take at least 30 years to pay off the construction (assuming 100% occupancy and ignoring maintenance costs and taxes).

Northshore Townhomes | Kenmore, WA
Northshore Townhomes | Kenmore, WA

Today, the ridiculous marketing website has gone dark, the sandwich boards that used to proclaim “NEW TOWNHOMES FROM $279K” have new “NOW LEASING” labels taped over them, and the front door of the former sales center has a slot cut into it for the rent drop. Renters are moving in, but with rents that average 16% higher (in terms of $/sqft) than other nearby apartments, it’s no surprise that the complex is slow to fill up.

We recently posted a link to a Puget Sound Business Journal story about Mike Mastro’s mounting financial troubles. Kenmore’s Northshore Townhomes is just one example of Mastro’s major market miscalculation. $24 million here, $10 million there, pretty soon you’re talking about some real money.

→ 48 CommentsCategories: Features
Tags: , , ,

Massive Condo Oversupply on the North End

By The Tim on March 4th, 2009 at 11:50 AM · 29 Comments

In keeping with the old cliché that “all real estate is local,” let’s take a moment to look at one local market: Kenmore townhomes and condos. I selected Kenmore because it happens to be where I live, so I am pretty familiar with the area and what projects have been built over the last couple years.

Here’s a summary of five major projects in Kenmore that have been built / converted since

Trail Walk Condominiums – 2007 conversion – 180 units – ~69% sold
Northshore Kenmore – 2008 new construction – 86 units – 0 (?) sold – (more in this forum thread)
Coventry Place Condominiums – 2007 conversion – 96 units – ~82% sold
Vermont Condos (website defunct) – 2008 conversion – 54 units – ~6% sold
Copper Lantern Homes (low income) – 2009 new construction – 0 sold

5-Project Total: 449 units, ~57% sold.
Total Unsold Units: ~157

From October through January, there were a grand total of 59 closed sales of all types (SFH, townhome, condo) in all of Kenmore reported by the NWMLS. That’s an average of about fifteen sales per month. In other words, just between these five townhome/condo projects, Kenmore has over ten “months of supply.”

It’s even worse if you only look at condo sales, of which there were a grand total of two in January. Two.

Meanwhile, over in Woodinville, a 2006 condo conversion called Timber Ridge has at least one unit on the market at half of what it sold for in 2006.

2006 sale price: $200,900
Current asking: $99,900

Half off. I shouldn’t be surprised, but somehow I still am.

→ 29 CommentsCategories: Features
Tags: , , ,

Construction Defaults Over 10%, Tacoma Condos Empty

By The Tim on October 10th, 2008 at 8:28 AM · 64 Comments

A few more articles from this week about how dramatically the local real estate market has slowed.

Puget Sound Business Journal: Construction defaults rise in Seattle area

The latest data on local new-home sales and construction-loan delinquencies illustrate the market forces underlying the growth in mechanics’ lien filings.

Delinquencies of single-family construction loans in the Seattle/Bellevue/Everett marketplace have risen to 11.4 percent of outstanding loan balances during the second quarter, according to data from Oakland, Calif.-based consultant Foresight Analytics.

That’s only slightly better than the median delinquency rate of 11.6 percent among the nation’s 100 largest metro areas. The Tacoma market is even more distressed, with 15.6 percent of single-family construction loans delinquent.

With respect to commercial and condominium construction loan delinquencies, both the Seattle/Bellevue/Everett (5.6 percent) and Tacoma (8.7 percent) vicinities fared worse during the second quarter than the top 100 markets combined (4.9 percent).

Falling new-home sales and values underlie much of the construction loan foreclosure activity.

Over 1 in 10 residential construction loans have gone delinquent? Yikes. So much for Seattle-area builders learning from the lessons of Florida, where they went through this same mess two years ago.

Tacoma News Tribune: Downtown condo sales at a crawl

How’s the market for condominiums in downtown Tacoma?

“What market?” says Judy Mayfield, head of sales for The Esplanade, the 162-unit project on the Foss Waterway, now nearing completion.

After two years of extolling the virtues of the nine-story luxury project, Mayfield and her staff have yet to close a deal on a single unit.

Tacoma’s condo market has suffered even more in the mortgage meltdown than other sectors of real estate.

Condominium developers and brokers remain convinced the condos are a good deal – in fact, they say, what with low interest rates and high inventory, they are a better deal than ever.

The problem, they say, is getting people to commit in such uncertain times.

“The timing couldn’t have been worse,” Mayfield said. “Had the market not turned in the past year and a half, we would definitely have sold out by now.”

Translation: “We were really counting on suckering 162 flippers into buying luxury condos in Tacoma on the false hopes that they could sell them for a profit in the perma-hot housing market. Now that the market has cooled and everyone realizes that nobody wants to actually live in luxury condos in Tacoma, we’re screwed!”

Seriously. Who sat down at the drawing board and said “one hundred and sixty-two luxury condos in Tacoma—sounds like a great plan!” Perhaps it was the same sage that decided a good plan would be to build an 86-unit townhome complex in Kenmore, then market it with pictures of sandy beaches and palm trees.

Does anyone out there still think the rental market will be tight as a growing number of these completed condo and townhome projects switch to rentals after attracting no buyers for months on end?

(Brad Berton, Puget Sound Business Journal, 10.03.2008)
(Rob Carson, Tacoma News Tribune, 10.10.2008)

→ 64 CommentsCategories: News
Tags: , , , , , ,

Has Greed Ruined Seattle’s Livability?

By The Tim on September 4th, 2008 at 12:41 PM · 60 Comments

I received the following in an email from a reader:

About the condo—comment article… the real issue is not the really cheap/ugly/tasteless and likely unlivable condos (apartments). Nor is it the equally horrible “townhouses.” It is about greed and lack of public (government) oversight and control.

The developers wanted the money, the government wanted the taxes and fees. The people were too busy raking in the first real money the bulk of Seattle has ever seen in history… to say HEY, what the heck are you doing.

Sad, the city I have loved for years is nearly off my list. No wonder the lovely, polite, civil people have turned rude and nasty (in a Northwest passive-aggressive kind of way).

This kind of behavior and housing greed has ruined many cities in this country…

How about opening a dialog on how to take back our city and stop being passive-aggressive whiners and start being organized and vocal about KEEPING our fabulous city just that.

This is not about money or affordability, it is about planning and demanding our rights as residents of a wonderful, (almost) world class city and LIVABILITY.

So what do you think? Has greed and lack of government oversight ruined the culture of Seattle? If so, can anything be done about it, or is it too late?

I’m interested to hear what people think about this topic.

→ 60 CommentsCategories: Features
Tags: , , , ,

Anecdote: Bailing on Kenmore Townhomes (Too Late)

By The Tim on July 1st, 2008 at 9:34 AM · 17 Comments

Okay, when I saw this this morning, I just had to mention it. There’s a little 8-unit townhome complex in my neighborhood (Kenmore) that I have mentioned on here a number of times in the past. Most recently, two of the eight units were up for sale. As of this morning, four of the eight are on the market. Here’s a brief summary:

Unit Last Sold Sold For Asking On Market
#2 (7212) 01/2002 $209,950 $339,500 39 days
#5 (7218) 10/2005 $280,950 $345,000 75 days
#6 (7220) 12/2005 $300,000 $335,000 21 days
#7 (7222) 09/2001 $234,950 $339,500 1 day

These nearly-identical 2 bed / 2.25 bath units are between 1,418 and 1,578 square feet and come with $191 a month in dues that apparently just pays for building upkeep (as in, there are no shared areas).

Just around the corner, a developer has dumped thirty-three 2 bed / 2.25 bath 1,325 square foot units on the market for $279,000 (according to their sandwich board signs anyway) as part of an 84-unit complex. These new construction units sport a nice shared park with a hot tub and all that rot, for monthly dues of just $142. Oh, and this ridiculous-looking ad that has been on their website for a month now claims that they’ll furnish it, too.

Anybody think the used townhomes around the corner have much chance of selling at $340k? It’s like watching a super-slow-motion train wreck.

→ 17 CommentsCategories: Features
Tags: , , ,

Follow-Up: Ugly Townhome Forum

By The Tim on June 9th, 2008 at 9:49 AM · 8 Comments

This is just a quick follow-up to Wednesday’s Ugly Townhomes post. I wasn’t able to go to the Seattle City Councilmember Sally Clark’s townhome forum on Saturday, but thankfully intrepid reporter Tracy Record with the West Seattle Blog was, and she reports on it there at length: Townhouse forum consensus: They CAN be saved, if…

By most accounts at this morning’s townhouse forum, an official meeting of City Councilmember Sally Clark’s Planning, Land Use, and Neighborhoods Committee held at the Capitol Hill Arts Center, townhouses themselves are not inherently evil. “There’s nothing intrinsically wrong with” them, Clark said in her opening remarks. However, the current form so many of them take — and if you think West Seattle has its share, it’s nothing like some of the photos shown of sprawling blocks of them in the North End — is primarily blamed on the city code, which as reported here and elsewhere, may soon be changed. Clark half-joked that the topic was a sneaky way to engage citizens with those upcoming revision proposals, saying at the start, “this is a way to keep people from getting narcoleptic about the Multifamily Code.” Definitely not a sleep-inducing event. Our full story, ahead…

If you’re interested in the regulation side of the townhome debate in Seattle proper, I highly recommend you check out the full article.

→ 8 CommentsCategories: News
Tags: