Poverty in US: American Dream Now Nightmare for Millions

edited June 2007 in Everything Else
I found this to be one of the most revealing articles I have read in the last few months...



One in Five Americans Live on Less than $7 per day

by William Shanley

Global Research, April 23, 2007
Thomas Paine's Corner

New Haven, Connecticut (April 16, 2007) From Combined News Services and Evolution Solutions Newsroom — A 2004 analysis of data by the US Census reports that 60 million Americans now live on less than $7 per day. That's one in five in the U.S. living on less than $2,555 per year. At the same time, the richest 1 per cent now garners about 16 per cent of national income, double what they earned in the 1960s.

While global income inequality is probably greater than it has ever been in human history, with half the world's population living on less than $3 per day, and the richest 1% receiving as much as the bottom 57%, the fact that so many Americans are living on so little, is particularly confounding.

The so-called "wealthiest, most abundant nation on Earth" now has the widest gap between rich and poor of any industrialized nation.[2] In light of the fact that one dollar spent in the Caribbean, Latin America and Asia buys what $3 or $4 does in the U.S means the quality of life for tens of millions of Americans is now on a par with huge populations living in the developing world.

And there's more bad news to report from here. There has been no increase in non-supervisory wages since 1972. Twenty-five million Americans now depend on emergency food aid.[3] This rapidly increasing trend is a brutal reminder of how the extreme political right has eviscerated the social safety net in the U.S. over the last 25 years. At a time when globalization is in full gallop, and its destructive effects are being felt in many working-class communities from Detroit to Connecticut, the national crisis is being exacerbated by the rising power and stature of a winner-take-all culture that celebrates greed and egotism by rewarding the super-rich at the expense of the poor.

With only 6% of global population, the US consumes 25% of the world's resources. A profile of Connecticut, one of America's richest states, is quite revealing. It possesses islands of some of the greatest wealth in the world throughout Fairfield County, yet has three of America's ten poorest cities, Hartford—the capitol—Bridgeport and New London. The New Haven-Meriden corridor has the 7th greatest gap between rich and poor in the US–in close running with some of the Old South's poorest and most segregated states, Mississippi and Alabama.

Across the nation, the price of this economic dysfunction is an increase in the level of insecurity and pain for everyone, and there is almost no place left to live without encountering violent and non-violent crime, proliferation of drugs, guns, mental illness, lost hope, cynicism and corruption. At the same time, the middle class is being forced to bear the brunt of the economic cost for courts, police, prisons and welfare through taxes. While the median price of a home has doubled in the last five years, and with interest rates now on the rise, home foreclosure rates for first-time homebuyers are skyrocketing. Rents have followed suit, pushing millions more into economic hardship, poverty and homelessness. For too many Americans, the litany of violence, punishment and suffering seems unending, and the American Dream is now a uniquely Made-in-America Nightmare.

Global Research Articles by William Shanley

Original source - http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php? ... cleId=5471

Comments

  • aldreth - Whats your point about this article??? It belongs on the misc section as this is the "Housing Bubble" Section.

    I call BS on the statement that 20% (60 million) of Americans live on less than $7 a day when there is a robust Welfare system! OR, it means that 20% of Americans work an average of 1 hour a day.

    Dont get me wrong, I am very sympathetic about poverty conditions in other countries, but in stating this about the US is a misleading statement.
  • If it stated that 1 in 5 Americans make less than $7 per day I might belive it as infants and children under the age of 16 probably make up ~20% of the US population...thus the proposed typo in the article.

    At least thats the only rational way I can see this being true...even illegals working under the table make more than $7 bucks a day.
  • When I was living in Missouri I was a subsitute teacher for a couple years. I worked in most of the schools in the district. I think that when you get out to rural America that there truly is much more poverty than we realize. Sure...I could come out with all the anecdotal stories about the schools that I would go to where 70% of the children were on the free and reduced breakfast/lunch program etc. etc.
  • ooops...somehow hit enter. anyhow...there is more than we think that is swept under the carpet but when you are around it you start to see it more and more. I could never even try to guess off of a census how much the poor really live on but I can tell you that I'm assuming that it's pretty low.To claim that a "robust welfare system" actually helps...pfffffft. I wouldn't believe any statistics about welfare and poverty as it's pretty hard to follow IMO. Too much of that stuff gets swept under the rug.

    Once you have worked with poor people (especially children) you get a whole new outlook on the situation.
  • and IMO, this should be in the Economics Section. Not the "everything" else page for things like "your aunts potato masher"

    That's just more sweeping it under the carpet.

    How many people really make it to the everything else page.
  • Nobody makes it there...your right, but isnt that the point, lol.

    EconE - You are right about much of the poor in America, yet even a min wage job would bring in 2080 X $5.25 = $10,920 which is about 4 times the $2,555 amt that was quoted.
  • Sure it belongs here. "There has been no increase in non-supervisory wages since 1972." The last time I checked we had more Indians than chiefs. How does this relate to a housing bubble? Well I can see how it could be one of the reasons we have so few buyers nationwide. Maybe not, matter of opinion.
  • minus rent, minus electricity, minus gas, food, clothing... not to mention children. now what are they living on?
  • Finance...I agree with what you say about the numbers and that a minimum wage 40 hour a week job puts people over the poverty threshold. The 2005 HHS poverty guidelines sets a limit of $9,570 for a 1 person household with an additional $3,260 for each additional family member. Personally, I think that is pretty low in my opinion. However I think that underemployment is something that we need to take into consideration. Could that be the reason that the numbers are lower than what we might think? Many people don't work a full 40 hour work-week. I think that it is pretty hard if not next to impossible to really nail down the extent of poverty in our country. Even with the statistics that we can find online, I'm not so sure that we'll be able to make any concrete determination with regards to how widespread nor how deep into poverty some people are.

    When I had kids come to me right before class and ask if they could go get breakfast in the cafeteria as they don't get to eat at home, or have children panic because they couldn't find their coat in the coat-room stating that they would be beaten if they didn't come home with it it really hit me hard as to how some people live. There were even students that would forgo recess in order to do their homework assignments stating that their family didn't even own a dictionary and they would be unable to complete the assignments at home.

    I still think that this should be in the economics section and could/should make for an interesting and necessary conversation topic.
Sign In or Register to comment.