100% upgrades? Or just weak reporting?
The Bay Area brings us this oddity. From an article today in the From San Fancisco Chronicle
So it's listed for twice what they paid for it, and they still won't break even on upgrades? It does look pretty posh:
http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1149874
But over $400,000 in non-structural upgrades in a brand new 3000 square foot home? Seems unlikely that this is the whole story. I wonder if what's really going on is they financed their lifestyle for the past 5 years via HELOCs or cash out refis?
[Saverio and Amy Bellomo's] two-story stucco house in American Canyon is on the market for $868,000. ... When the Bellomos bought their house on Wetlands Edge Drive in 2002 ... they paid $424,000.
From the outside, the home is similar to many on the block: a large, nondescript house on a smallish lot. But inside, the house is large and stately. The Bellomos put considerable work and money into making it that way. They upgraded cabinets and added granite in the kitchen, placed an inlay in the foyer's hardwood floor and added marble and granite slabs in the bathrooms.
The Bellomos declined to say how much they paid to make the renovations but admitted that even if the house fetches full price they won't break even.
So it's listed for twice what they paid for it, and they still won't break even on upgrades? It does look pretty posh:
http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1149874
But over $400,000 in non-structural upgrades in a brand new 3000 square foot home? Seems unlikely that this is the whole story. I wonder if what's really going on is they financed their lifestyle for the past 5 years via HELOCs or cash out refis?
Comments