Seattle Bubble

You’ve probably heard about the foreclosure tours that are becoming common in places like Las Vegas and Sacramento. Well it looks like they have finally arrived in the Northwest.

Thurston County foreclosure notices have increased more than 50 percent in the first quarter of 2008 compared with the same period last year, prompting one real estate agent to begin offering tours of homes in various stages of foreclosure.

Through the first three months of the year, the county has received 228 foreclosure notices, up 54.1 percent from the 148 received during the same period last year, county licensing and recording manager Terra Howell said.

South Sound real estate agent Phil Sharp has tried to capitalize on this increase by offering tours of foreclosed property to potential investors.

In February there were only 223 closed sales in Thurston county. So although 228 foreclosures doesn’t seem like much, it might be hard to find buyers for those properties.

Tim Salo of Olympia said he wants to diversify his investment portfolio by buying real estate.

He started shopping for foreclosed properties about six months ago, but then prices averaged about $250,000. Since, he has noticed prices for distressed property fall 10 percent to 15 percent.

“Now, it pencils out,” he said about the investment.

Wow, so if property prices have fallen 10 to 15 percent in just six months, why wouldn’t you wait another six months to see if they keep falling further? Sure, if you’re “buying for the long term” and all that, it doesn’t matter, bla bla bla, but isn’t buying today when it is a near-certainty that prices will be cheaper tomorrow just throwing money away?

(Rolf Boone, The Olympian, 03.30.2008)

Please vote in this poll using the sidebar.

I’d like to take a moment to announce a fun new gimmick that I’ve created for donating to Seattle Bubble: Bulls, Bears, and Ponies. A lot of people have given some money to Seattle Bubble, and your donations are greatly appreciated. However, until now there has been no way to get a little recognition for your contribution to keeping this site running.

That’s where Bulls, Bears, and Ponies come in. It’s just a fun little way for me to say “thank you” to people that donate to Seattle Bubble. When you donate through the Bulls, Bears, Ponies page, you’ll get your very own little icon over on the sidebar under the advertising block, with whatever message you choose. It will even link to a site if you like.

For the full details, check out the Bulls, Bears, Ponies page. Have a great weekend everyone.

We’ve been focusing more on original content here lately, which means that as articles crop up in other local news sources, we haven’t been posting every single one. Of course, there are some interesting things being said about the local housing market in other news sources, so it’s good to touch base with them once in a while.

So, here are excerpts from some of the interesting real-estate-related articles that have been printed elsewhere in the last week.

[Read more →]

Over at the P-I earlier this week, Bill Virgin chimed in on the housing mess again with yet another well-reasoned column: Homes are good investments, not slot machines or ATMs.

In the great American sport of finger pointing and blame shifting, a new villain has emerged to explain the mortgage-finance crisis.

The fault, it turns out, lies not with incompetent, deceptive lenders, naïve, speculating borrowers, greedy, reckless Wall Streeters, slumbering regulators, bubble-creator Alan Greenspan or all of the above.

Instead, the root cause is something far more fundamental: the American belief in the value of homeownership.

Or so says an emerging theory that argues that the attributes of owning a home have been, pardon the phrase, oversold, and had the U.S. not been so hellbent on getting people to buy, much of the current debacle could have been avoided.

So now is probably a useful time to review some basics about American attitudes toward homeownership, and whether they did, in fact, contribute to the economy-shaking mess we’re now in:

1. Homeownership is good. Homeownership — for the individual and for society — works.
2. What’s not so good, and what consequently hasn’t worked, are the methods for encouraging homeownership and the expectations of what ownership would accomplish financially for the buyers.

…
Homeownership was also considered a financial virtue, being one of the few ways average Americans could achieve long-term financial solvency. Once they saved up for a down payment on that starter home, they could use the equity they slowly built up, from their own payments, price appreciation and improvements to the property, to move up to larger or nicer homes, to maybe even — and here’s a novel concept today — to enjoy the income freed up by paying off the mortgage.

Which is about the point in our story where the trouble begins.
…
Eventually the markets will correct, although the price of that correction is likely to be steep in lost jobs, houses, savings and economic health. If our present calamity strips away the excesses and false assumptions, and returns an appreciation of the merits of home ownership, that might be one of the few good things to come out of this.

Bill continues to be one of the few in the local mainstream press that actually seems to get what’s really been going on, and where we’re headed as a result of this mess we’ve gotten ourselves into. As usual, you should read the whole article. Kudos to Bill.

(Bill Virgin, Seattle P-I, 03.24.2008)

Sorry no stats or graphs from me, just in the trenches reporting.

Snohomish Co. Update:

My wife is off providing sterling service tonight in Issaquah for clients who are buying/selling a home, (yes, we do business all over) so I’ve got some free time to do a bit of blogging and research.

There are a quite a few homes both listed and FSBO that are short sale candidates. That means that if the existing homeowner were to get an offer, the lender would have to agree to take an amount less than the sum of their encumbrances.

After researching about 15 properties that were short sale candidates, I stopped. What’s the point. The story kind of repeated itself. Basically, the gist of it is that I see home prices “softening” further. Many short sales are in neighborhoods that were recently built in 2004, 2005, 2006, early 2007. 100% financing was the primary type of mortgage on just about all of these short sale candidates. Lots of sub-prime lenders financed these homes, some of which are no longer around. This really is the story that we are going to have to get used to.

If interest rates continue to stay low and prices continue to have downward pressure, those who can buy will be receiving much more house for their hard earned money. So that is the silver lining if you are on the buyers side of the HUD-1 Settlement Statement.

I would love to report that the market in Snohomish Co. is earnestly in the Spring groove for buying but the truth is that the first quarter of the year is coming to a close with sales volumes down YOY , so unless we have quite a change in the credit markets to get things moving along as we enter the prime selling/buying season of April, May and June, it may not be any better than the existing pace we are on.

As it stands, lending requirements have become stringent enough that it is exposing quite nicely how much of the buying in months past really was a function of consumers obtaining mortgages that were setting many up for financial distress. In other words, eliminating the loose lending (I know everyone has read this ad nauseum) has exposed the frenzied market for what it really was—a foundation of quicksand via toxic financing that could only be rescued by ever escalating housing prices. The unraveling of the credit markets, billions in losses and subsequent bail out of Wall Street superfortresses such as Bear Stearns and others (more to come?) shows that on every dollar lost there was an address somewhere in America tied to it.

In January, refinancing did take a very big jump when rates dropped dramatically to about 5% and many people took advantage (those that could anyway).

My belief is that inventory will continue to increase (outpace sales) as some of those listings that were taken off the market in Fall and Winter of 2007 try again this Spring.

In conclusion, the fallout from the mortgage binge and foolish lending is really disrupting markets across the country. It is not different here in the Puget Sound region and I hope the seriousness and disappointment in my tone comes across. Is this really what was intended when we think of the American Dream? I know, I know, it’s just a natural market cycle and I need to get over it.

S-Crow