Seattle Bubble

News & discussion about real estate & the housing bubble in the Seattle area.

Seattle Bubble - News & discussion about real estate & the housing bubble in the Seattle area.

Entries Tagged as 'lending'

What’s Behind Rising FHA Defaults?

By Jillayne Schlicke on September 21st, 2009 at 9:00 AM · 60 Comments

Note from The Tim: Jillayne Schlicke has been a valued member of the Seattle Bubble community for quite some time, and I’m happy to welcome her as a guest poster. Jillayne has many years experience in the lending industry and offers some great insights. She currently provides continuing education for real estate professionals through her company CE Forward.

I’d like to thank The Tim for inviting me to create occasional guest posts for Seattle Bubble readers. SB’s bloggers and commenters have taught me how to critically analyze local real estate statistics. SB was a safe place I could go on a Friday night when my kids were elsewhere and I was craving an understanding of what was happening during the 2007-08 meltdown. I am honored to give back to the SB community.

The rising default rate on FHA loans is concerning but I’m not terribly surprised. It’s really no secret that the government is using Fannie, Freddie and FHA to help keep the banks afloat by allowing zombie banks to pawn off their toxic crap to the agencies. Ultimately the taxpayer is paying the price as we see Fannie and Freddie continuing to run a red balance sheet and FHA headed down the same path.

FHA originations were all but dead during the real estate bubble because so many LOs favored subprime lending where underwriting guidelines were non-existent. But long ago, in a land far, far away, when we were rocking out to Duran Duran, Echo and the Bunnyman, and Joy Division, I was processing FHA loans for a mortgage banker in Seattle. When rates came down to a low of 13% I had about 100 files in process. I was trained to pre-underwrite my files so underwriting recruited me and I became a young underwriter at age 23, just old enough to go drinking after work with the crew. I’ll never forget Barbie Owens who had the entire FHA underwriting manual embedded into her brain Matrix-style (I know Jujitsu!) She could recite entire paragraphs from the manual verbatim. Imagine 20 female underwriters, all of us smoked, and none of the windows opened. That was mortgage banking in the 80s. But I digress.

Back in the 1980s, underwriting was serious business. We were treated like gods by the loan originators who worked in fear of us declining their deal. Only David Korch knew how to play it. He brought us ice cream bars on hot, sunny days. New underwriters were given bunny files; easy conventional refinances, to cut our teeth. Then we were sent to FHA training. FHA had a field office in Seattle with real humans who would actually answer the phone and our questions. At least once a year a representative from FHA would take new underwriters through a six week FHA underwriting course called Direct Endorsement 101. After we finished we could underwrite FHA credit only (on all FHA loans the appraisal goes through a separate underwriting process) as long as a senior FHA underwriter signed our files.

If an FHA loan went into default, it was presented as a case study in meetings so that all of us could learn from our mistakes. If an FHA underwriter had too many defaults against her identifying number, she was put on probation.

This all changed during the subprime days when FHA’s business went down to literally nothing. Today, FHA allows the FHA-approved lenders to appoint and train their own underwriters! Does anyone see the problem with that policy?

Let’s revisit early 2008. Wholesale lenders are dropping like flies, and six figure income mortgage brokers are sweating bullets trying to figure out how to make their next boat, BMW, second home, first home, and condo-in-Hawaii payment month after month. They see the writing on the wall and the future, as far as they could see, was FHA. Thousands of mortgage brokers rushed to become approved to originate FHA loans and hundreds of wholesale lenders and banks had to quick beef up their underwriting departments to handle the onslaught of FHA loans being hurriedly thrown at them.

Many of those underwriters only knew subprime loans and had never seen an FHA file, never read the FHA Single Family Mortgage Insurance Manual for 203b loans and suddenly lenders were making folks FHA underwriters overnight.

And now we’re wondering why default rates are so high.

FHA doesn’t make subprime loans. They will allow loans to people with less than perfect credit but this is definitely not subprime territory.

We have three main problems leading to this dramatic rise in FHA defaults:

  1. Pressure from government to use FHA for purposes of taking toxic loans off the bank’s balance sheets;
  2. Lack of education, training, and mentoring of new underwriters during the recent, dramatic rise in FHA originations; and,
  3. Lack of a large enough down payment from the homeowner to insure against falling home prices.

Negative equity combined with job loss, business failure, or other financial distress means higher FHA defaults are in our future as long as home values continue to drop, we allow banks to put underwriters into service with no training, and we let the politicians use FHA as a toxic waste dump.

→ 60 CommentsCategories: Features
Tags: , , , ,

How Many More Washington Banks Will Fail?

By The Tim on September 15th, 2009 at 10:30 AM · 47 Comments

Interesting follow-up to Friday’s failure of Venture Bank via the Tacoma News Tribune: Some banks in state risk failure

The best news to derive from Friday’s announced failure and sale of DuPont-based Venture Bank came in the form of a report from a Seattle TV and radio station.

But the news – that no other banks in Washington were in trouble and facing closure – was very wrong.

I believe that the remark above is referring to this report from KOMO news, which contained the (false) claim that “as of right now, there are no other banks in financial trouble in the state.”

Yes, Venture did fail.

But yes again, in fact, there are other banks in the state that might also fail.

Scott Jarvis, director of the state Department of Financial Institutions, said Monday that he thinks he knows how that incorrect information was relayed to the public.

“The consumer reporter called Brad,” Jarvis said. (That would be Brad Williamson, head of banks at DFI.)

The reporter asked if any other banks were in trouble. Williamson – on Friday evening – answered, “We are not closing any more banks this week.”

“Somehow that got translated for the 11 o’clock news that there are no other banks in trouble,” Jarvis said.

“The truth is that we did not close any more banks on Friday,” he said.

And he continued, “There is considerable strain on our banking system attributable to the expansion we had in commercial real estate growth.”

With Ben Bernanke out there claiming that “the recession is very likely over,” it will be interesting to see how many more local banks continue to fail under the continued financial stress of non-performing construction loans.

(C.R. Roberts, Tacoma News Tribune, 09.15.2009)

→ 47 CommentsCategories: News
Tags: , , , , ,

Fiduciary Standards in Lending and on Wall Street: Can it Work?

By S-Crow on September 3rd, 2009 at 6:00 AM · 42 Comments

Question for discussion: In Washington State, can Loan Officers operate within the framework of a Fiduciary duty to their clients when the lending industry is structured with incentives that may be in conflict with the new standard?

Jane Kim of the Wall Street Journal wrote an excellent article in this past weekend’s issue regarding Wall Street brokers (selling investments) being placed under Fiduciary standards in dealing with customers.

Currently, Wall Street brokers are held to what is termed “suitability standard,” which is a more lenient standard than that of a fiduciary.  In contrast, Registered Investment Advisers have operated for a long time under the more stringent “fiduciary” standard—a legal standard that compelled them to act in the best interests of customers.  The proposed higher standard forces disclosure of potential conflicts of interest (i.e., if they make more money off of an investment offered vs. others) and promotes recommendations of investments that may be less costly to the consumer and more tax-efficient.

While Wall Street struggles with reform as part of its regulatory overhaul, the mortgage industry has also implemented reform by introducing a similar “fiduciary standard” for mortgage brokers and loan officers.  Prior to this reform in the mortgage industry, those who originated loans had no obligation to work in the best interest of their customers.

“In most states, mortgage loan originators still have no fiduciary obligation to work on behalf of their client’s best interests. The state of California mandated fiduciary duties for only mortgage brokers even during the height of the real estate bubble and Washington State added fiduciary duties for mortgage brokers and loan originators in 2008 but this still leaves consumer loan company loan officers (LO’s) and bank loan officers with more of a salesperson’s status.  I’m sure there are some LOs who work at a bank, credit union, or consumer loan company (they like to say “mortgage banker” or “correspondent lender”
because it sounds better) who do regularly look after their clients’ best interests but this is just mere subjectivism.”

Jillayne Schlicke,  Founder of the National Assn. of Mortgage Fiduciaries

[post continues, click below]
[Read more →]

→ 42 CommentsCategories: Opinion
Tags: , , ,

Seattle Times “$1.5M condo on 20K income” Story Full of Gaping Holes

By The Tim on February 23rd, 2009 at 6:00 AM · 79 Comments

Last Friday, the Seattle Times ran an interesting story about a “limousine driver, earning little more than minimum wage” being approved for a loan on a $1.5 million condo in Bellevue Towers. The story was also picked up by at least one of the local television news outlets, and has been making the rounds on the internet all weekend.

Here’s a brief excerpt from the piece, titled $1.5M condo on $20K income? Prospective buyers lose $175K in Bellevue.

When Uzbek hot-dog vendor Danil Kasimov thought of America, he thought of the place portrayed in movies — a Land of Plenty where anyone’s dreams could come true.

In 2000, he emigrated to the U.S., settled in Redmond and became a limousine driver, earning little more than minimum wage.

Two years ago, a real-estate agent suggested he consider purchasing a condominium at the luxurious Bellevue Towers. To Kasimov, it seemed his vision of America was unfolding with the ease of the touch-screen showing eventual views from his dream condo on the 32nd floor.

Delighted that he prequalified for a $1.5 million condo on his $20,000-a-year income, he put down more than $75,000 in earnest money he borrowed from a friend.

But that money — and nearly $100,000 from five other prospective condo buyers — soon evaporated. The six filed a lawsuit in King County Superior Court this week against Bellevue Towers and JP Morgan Chase Bank, alleging the lender falsified documents, making it possible for them to prequalify for loans they could never actually get.

Now, before I get into the numerous problems with this article, I want to say up front that I’m not attempting to stick up for the banks, the real estate agent, or anyone else. Far from it. My purpose here is merely to point out the incredible one-sidedness and poor reporting in this Times article. I would also like to point out that most of these facts were brought to light by a number of commenters on the Seattle Times story, including “cocoas” and “Vesta.” I’m just highlighting these issues here because I think the full story should be heard.

All of the information in this post can be found in publicly-available records, accessible to anyone online in a matter of minutes. Links are provided for all sources.

Claim: Danil Kasimov is “a limousine driver, earning little more than minimum wage.”
Reality: Public records show a Danil Kasimov as the owner of a limousine company named Action Towncar.

A simple search of Washington State business licenses reveals that Mr. Kasimov is in fact the owner of Action Towncar, LLC, a Redmond-based limousine company, not merely a “limousine driver,” as stated in the article. Of course, this does not tell us how much Mr. Kasimov is earning, so it is possible that the “little more than minimum wage” part could be true.

Claim: Danil Kasimov was unwittingly duped by a real estate agent and a flashy sales presentation into signing paperwork he had no way of understanding.
Reality: Public records show three different purchases of real estate in the Redmond/Bellevue area by a Danil Kasimov over the last five years, totaling nearly $1.6 million.

July 2004—Danil Kasimov purchases a condo for $240,000. February 2007—Danil Kasimov purchases a 4-bed, 1,800 sqft house for $665,000 and a 3-bed, 3,100 sqft house for $686,000. The address listed on two of the parcels matches the address for the Danil Kasimov that owns Action Towncar, and the signatures on the paperwork of all three home purchases match each other.

Both of the $600k homes were foreclosed on in January of this year. Mr. Kasimov appears to still own the 2004 condo. Should Mr. Kasimov have been given any of these loans? It would appear not. However, it is also evident that Mr. Kasimov was not as naïve about the home buying and financing process as the article makes him out to be.

Claim: “…they were never given a copy of the contract — which was written in English, a language they didn’t understand…” and “Kasimov and the other plaintiffs, Yuri and Dora Aleksandrov and Davud Kasparov, none of whom are fluent in English…” (emphasis mine)
Reality: It is unlikely that any of these individuals are ignorant of the English language.

Danil Kasimov’s LinkedIn profile (the first result on a Google search for his name) reveals that he attended a school in his native Uzbekistan called the Uzbek State World Languages University, and according to the article, he has lived in the United States for nearly 10 years. Davud Kasparov attended the UW school of engineering and is now employed at a local aircraft engineering firm. Yuri & Dora Alexsandrov purchased a $336k home in 2001 which was refinanced six times between 2002 and 2008. None of these people are likely to be the confused and helpless foreigners that the article portrays them as.

I will point out that it is possible that there is another Danil Kasimov unrelated to the individual in the Seattle Times story, who just happens to own a limo company in Redmond and have a penchant for dabbling in real estate with dangerous loans. Possible, but highly unlikely, in my opinion.

The story printed in the Seattle Times portrays a starry-eyed, helpless group of individuals that were taken advantage of by a slimy real estate agent (who is inexplicably not named by the Times), shady lenders, and overzealous salespeople. The “angle” on the Times story is clear: Danil Kasimov and the others listed in the suit against Bellevue Towers are unwitting victims. It would appear that Nancy Bartley, the author of this article, had a story in mind that she wanted to tell, and did not bother to even spend 30 minutes researching the supposed victims online and in public records.

Danil Kasimov and the others involved in the lawsuit against Bellevue Towers may have a valid legal case, or they may not. But when we are given a more complete picture of the individuals involved in this story, it becomes clear that it is not as cut and dry as the Seattle Times has made it out to be. In reality, it would appear that everyone in this story likely attempted to victimize everyone else, and in the end, they all lost.

Update 02/25: The Seattle Times has corrected some of the errors and omissions in the article. See below for details.

→ 79 CommentsCategories: Features · News
Tags: , , ,

Government Loan Limits Lowered $60k for Seattle

By The Tim on November 10th, 2008 at 4:55 PM · 18 Comments

As astute market observers may recall, back in March (pre-complete-government-takeover) the conforming loan limit for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac-backed loans was bumped from $417,000 to $567,500 for the Seattle area (King, Pierce, and Snohomish counties). At that time, the local press was touting the new limits at “a big dose of first aid” and the “shot in the arm” for the housing market, while here at Seattle Bubble we asked the question: Will Higher Government Loan Limits Boost Seattle’s Market?

Our conclusion was that the added lending restrictions attached to the “Temporary Jumbo Conforming” loans set the bar sufficiently high as to prevent the higher limits from having the (apparently intended) effect of preventing home prices from falling further. Given that the median price of homes in the Seattle area have fallen 6-8% in the intervening seven months, it would appear that this assessment was accurate. Of course, one could argue that perhaps without the higher conforming limit, prices would have dropped 10% or more in the same time, and there’s really no way to know whether that might be true.

If we assume that the Seattle area’s $567,500 temporary conforming limit did in fact somehow soften the blow, however slightly, then the latest news that this limit is being dropped to $506,000 is likely to be unwelcome. However, it should be noted that as far as I am aware, all the same restrictions are still in place including, but not limited to:

  • Fixed-rate loans are limited to 90% LTV/CLTV (loan to value/combined loan to value).
  • Minimum FICO for any loan is 660.
  • Minimum FICO for LTVs greater than 80% is 700.
  • No late mortgage payments in the preceding 12 months.
  • Full doc only.

While the $567,500 temporary limit was based on a calculation of 125% of the median home price (source), the new $506,000 limit is “set equal to 115 percent of local median house prices” (source). So the new loan limit translates to a drop in government-calculated median home price from $454,000 around March to $440,000 around October.

Interestingly, although the King County SFH median price was $440,000 in May, the Snohomish County SFH median has never breached $400,000, and Pierce County topped out below $300,000. This is explained in the announcement pdf:

In calculating loan limits, FHFA used median house price estimates calculated by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Those values have been estimated in a manner consistent with requirements of the National Housing Act, which requires that median prices for all counties in metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) be set equal to the median price for the highest-cost county.

So will the new, lower limit put even more of a damper on Seattle area home sales? Or was the effect of the higher limit so negligible that the reduction won’t really matter?

→ 18 CommentsCategories: News
Tags: , , , , ,

Local Banks Slammed by Housing Bust

By The Tim on June 30th, 2008 at 10:30 AM · 30 Comments

From today’s Everett Herald: Housing slump hits local banks hard

Low interest rates, the loss of the home construction boom and investor pessimism all are weighing down on bank stocks, dealing a big blow to all three of the local banks traded on Wall Street.

Lynnwood’s City Bank, along with Frontier Financial and Cascade Financial — both Everett-based banking firms — have seen their share prices decline by more than half in the past year.

They’re not alone. The nation’s biggest banks and thrifts also are suffering. Shares of Seattle-based Washington Mutual, one of the hardest hit by the mortgage meltdown, have plummeted 90 percent from their peak in 2007. The Standard & Poor’s Bank Index, which includes such national names as US Bancorp, Keycorp and Wells Fargo, has tumbled 50 percent in the past year.

Note that unlike Washington Mutual, the difficulties these local banks are experiencing can’t be blamed on making subprime loans in California. It’s all local.

Sara Hasan, banking analyst at Seattle’s McAdams Wright Ragen Inc., said the local banks are seen as vulnerable to the downturn in housing, as a substantial number of their loans have been to the construction industry.

“In the Northwest especially, it seems like we’re seeing the first wave of difficulties with the housing market,” Hasan said. “Bankers are nervous, and their investors are nervous, too.”

It seems to me that they have good reason to be nervous.

In related news, WaMu replaces president of branch network.

Washington Mutual said today it has replaced James Corcoran, president of its vast retail branch network.

Stephen Rotella, WaMu’s president and CEO, will assume Corcoran’s duties until a permanent successor is named.

(Eric Fetters, Everett Herald, 06.30.2008)
(Times Staff, Seattle Times, 06.30.2008)

→ 30 CommentsCategories: News
Tags: , , , , ,