Seattle Bubble

News & discussion about real estate & the housing bubble in the Seattle area.

Seattle Bubble - News & discussion about real estate & the housing bubble in the Seattle area.

Entries Tagged as 'Wall_Street_Journal'

Weekend News Roundup

By The Tim on July 6th, 2009 at 8:00 AM · 18 Comments

Lots of local real estate related news over the weekend worth mentioning. Here’s a brief roundup of the stories you might be interested in.

Let’s kick things off with some good news via Aubrey Cohen at the P-I. Looks like the state’s irresponsible plan to pre-distribute $8,000 tax credit is dead in the water, thanks to the IRS.

SeattlePI.com: State clarifies state of tax credit loan plan

There has been a lot of information circulating in the past few months regarding a possible Tax Credit bridge loan program that would have potentially “monetized” the currently available $8,000 federal tax credit for qualified first time homebuyers. This potential program would have allowed these first time homebuyers to actually come to the closing table with their credit in hand, as opposed to waiting to have these funds available until after closing.

On June 2, 2009, the IRS formally declined this request citing long-standing regulations requiring refunds be paid only to the person or persons filing the tax return. Due to significant financial risks associated with the Tax Credit bridge loan program and recent guidance published from the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Commission discontinued the development of the Tax Credit bridge loan program.

Next up, a bit of humor from SmartMoney.com, who you may recall last October labeled Seattle as “in the best shape for a rebound.”

SmartMoney.com: 5 Housing Markets That Have Further to Fall

In the Northwest, median home prices are down but they remain above the national average. Portland’s prices fell 2.1% in March. Home prices in Seattle were down 2.0% for the month.

The Pacific Northwest bubble was among the last to burst, which could mean the market will be among the last to recover.

And here’s a handful of additional stories for you to digest this post-holiday Monday morning…

Seattle Times: Landmark Smith Tower mostly vacant

Thanks to the recession and Washington Mutual’s collapse, there’s no shortage of vacant office space in downtown Seattle. One of the emptiest buildings also is one of the region’s best-known and most-loved.

The 95-year-old Smith Tower, once the tallest building west of Chicago, is at least 70 percent vacant, according to online listings and commercial real-estate databases.

Walton Street bought the 257,000-square-foot Smith Tower for $43 million in April 2006, when the market was nearing its peak and the tower was 92 percent occupied, according to its previous owner.

Less than a year later the new owner sought — and ultimately received — city approval to convert the entire building to condos, a move prompted, in part, by the impending departure of the tower’s two largest office tenants.

When the downtown condo market began to cool later in 2007, Walton Street scaled back its condo-conversion plans to just the top 12 stories.

But it hasn’t pursued permits for that scenario for more than a year, city records indicate.

The Smith Tower has always been my favorite building in downtown Seattle. It’s a shame to see it sit unused like this. I actually like the idea of converting it to condos, although I’m not sure there would be all that much appeal to live in Pioneer Square…

Seattle Times: Lynnwood’s City Bank gets tighter scrutiny

City Bank of Lynnwood, hurt by heavy lending to developers and homebuilders, on Thursday became the latest local bank to submit to tighter oversight from federal and state regulators.

It signed an agreement, called a cease-and-desist order, that requires City Bank to shrink the volume of nonperforming loans and foreclosed real estate it’s carrying on its books; reduce its dependence on brokered deposits; increase its capital levels; and make other operational and organizational changes.

Puget Sound Business Journal: Lexas believes condo buyers will show up

Call him a contrarian. Escala developer Eric Midby expects to move ahead with a pair of high-rise hotel and condominium towers at a time when nearly every other developer has decided to sit out this market because of the recession.

Midby, a principal and development manager at Lexas Cos., is betting that by getting the company’s next condo project under way now, he can exploit a two-year gap in the delivery of new condominium units in downtown Seattle that starts next year.

“We firmly believe that Seattle very soon is going to have a shortage of housing, that all the units in downtown will fill up and there will be continued demand,” Midby said.

Seattle Times: Property taxes: Appeals shoot up is King, Snohomish Counties

Homeowners complained in near-record numbers about high valuations last year. Appeals of property values shot up more than threefold in King County, from 3,767 in 2007 to 13,156 in 2008. The last time there were that many appeals was 1991, when a sluggish real-estate market followed several years of rapidly climbing home values.

Appeals also increased in Snohomish County last year — from 1,688 to 2,347.

Appeals resulted in lowered values about half the time in King County and about a third of the time in Snohomish County, according to the assessors.

I remind any Seattle Bubble readers that are considering appealing their assessment that S-Crow posted a useful “how-to” on this process that would be a good starting point.

West Seattle Blog: City Council townhouse talk in West Seattle: Less (rules) is more?

…As in, less (fewer) restrictions could mean more variety in housing units. Or, so said the architects from whom City Councilmember Sally Clark and her Planning, Land Use and Neighborhoods Committee heard at Youngstown Arts Center Tuesday night.

The West Seattle meeting addressed only a slice of the Multi-Family Code Update, townhouses and “low-rise” zoning in particular.

And finally, here’s a national story on the subject of “strategic defaults,” which we have been discussing lately.
Wall Street Journal: New Evidence on the Foreclosure Crisis

What is really behind the mushrooming rate of mortgage foreclosures since 2007? The evidence from a huge national database containing millions of individual loans strongly suggests that the single most important factor is whether the homeowner has negative equity in a house — that is, the balance of the mortgage is greater than the value of the house. This means that most government policies being discussed to remedy woes in the housing market are misdirected.

…the focus on subprimes ignores the widely available industry facts (reported by the Mortgage Bankers Association) that 51% of all foreclosed homes had prime loans, not subprime, and that the foreclosure rate for prime loans grew by 488% compared to a growth rate of 200% for subprime foreclosures.

…although only 12% of homes had negative equity, they comprised 47% of all foreclosures.

Yow.

→ 18 CommentsCategories: News
Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Cramdowns Rejected by Senate, Appraisals Insulated from Banks

By The Tim on May 1st, 2009 at 9:18 AM · 126 Comments

Two good news stories on the national front that are worth sharing this morning.

Story 1: Senate Defeats Mortgage ‘Cram-Down’ as Democrats Balk

The U.S. Senate rejected a measure that would let bankruptcy judges cut mortgage terms to help borrowers avoid foreclosure, a victory for banks and credit unions that said the legislation would increase loan costs.

The proposed “cram-down” amendment to a housing bill was defeated today in a 51-45 vote, with 12 Democrats among the 51 opponents.

Banks that refused to negotiate a compromise were “greedy, stubborn and unreasonable,” said Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, a Rhode Island Democrat.

“The answer is not to incentivize bankruptcy by making it the means to save one’s home,” [Arizona Republican Senator Jon] Kyl said.

This is good news, in my opinion. Banks should be eating the losses on these homes in the open market, not by writing down the principal to help the home “owner” stay in a house they obviously simply cannot afford. So you lost “your” home—yeah it sucks, but go find a cheap rental and move on. Maybe next time you buy a house you’ll be more prudent.

Note, I am not saying that everyone who is being foreclosed on bought more house than they could afford, or used their home as an ATM. I figure that probably describes at least 70% of the current foreclosures, and such people are the primary reason for the “foreclosure crisis” we’re currently watching unfold.

[Update: As I mention in the comments below, I also believe we should be prosecuting the banks and the people at the banks for the massive fraud they willingly and knowingly perpetuated through these loans during the boom.]

Story 2: Realtors, Mtge Brokers Push For Delay In New Appraisal Rules

Realtors and mortgage brokers are in an 11th-hour push to delay by a year new Fannie Mae (FNM) and Freddie Mac (FRE) rules governing real-estate appraisals.

The rules, which take effect May 1, have sparked criticism from many corners of the real-estate industry.

The National Association of Realtors complained in a letter last week that the industry was given scant guidance and too little time to implement the rules. Appraisers worry the rules, which will put middlemen between loan originators and appraisers, will squeeze their fees. Meanwhile, mortgage brokers say the changes will make them uncompetitive.

“This is going to be devastating for everyone,” Marc Savitt, the president of the National Association of Mortgage Brokers, said Monday.

The rules arose from an investigation by New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo into alleged collusion between mortgage lenders and appraisers to pump up home values. Fannie and Freddie, which became targets of probe, agreed in early 2008 to require all appraisers on mortgages they buy or guarantee to adhere to a new code of conduct.

The rules are intended to reduce collusion and fraud in the appraisal industry, which has been blamed for generating wildly inflated home values during the housing boom. The new code requires lenders to go through third-parties, known as appraisal management companies, to order appraisals. Lenders with in-house appraisal staff must set up safeguards to ensure loan officers don’t influence the home appraisal process.

Oh yeah, that sounds really “devastating,” doesn’t it? Shouldn’t safeguards like this have been in place from the start? I can think of one reason that banks and real estate agents would not be on board with this: they like being able to influence appraisals.

It’s nice to read some good news for a change when it comes to all the meddling the government has been doing in the housing market lately.

→ 126 CommentsCategories: News
Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Morning News: National Housing “Crisis,” Boeing, Alaska Air, & More

By The Tim on April 23rd, 2009 at 9:28 AM · 1 Comment

Here’s a few national stories of note, and a handful of local economic news stories from this morning:

Quote of the morning is from the New York Times article:

[Home prices] don’t have as far to fall today, but the great real estate crash is not over, either. So if you are part of the 30 percent of American households who rent and you’re trying to decide when to buy, relax.

The market is still coming your way.

Be sure to also check out the nifty interactive chart in the New York Times piece that directly compares home price to median income ratios for the 20 Case-Shiller markets. If you’re wondering why their ratios are so much different than what we graphed earlier this month, note that they are using median household income, whereas our chart used per capita income.

→ 1 CommentCategories: News
Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Seattle to Weather the Recession “Better than Most”?

By The Tim on September 16th, 2008 at 8:10 AM · 105 Comments

Here’s a brief article from the Wall Street Journal that might be of interest: Weathering the Rain, And the Property Storm

The troubles facing most Seattle-area landlords are more like a Puget Sound drizzle than the stormy skies swirling around markets such as Phoenix or Orange County, Calif.

Certainly the economic turmoil buffeting the nation’s property markets has touched Seattle. The area’s median home prices are falling, and average commercial rent gains are slowing. The volume of large office, retail and warehouse sales has dropped dramatically this year, according to Real Capital Analytics. The area’s job growth slipped to 2.3% in July, down from 3% in the year-earlier month, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Moreover, tighter economic times are hurting some large employers and real-estate consumers in the region, home to about 3.4 million people. As Starbucks Corp. pulls back from an expansion and closes hundreds of stores nationwide, it is considering selling a downtown office building it is developing and an existing one it owns, both in Seattle’s Pioneer Square neighborhood

But amid these pressures, the Seattle region’s office-, retail- and apartment-leasing markets still have outshined most major U.S. metropolitan areas by some key measures. While retail rents in most markets are falling, average Seattle-area retail rents are expected to rise 3% this year, the highest gain of 54 major markets tracked by Property & Portfolio Research, a real-estate research firm.

“I wouldn’t say it’s recession-proof, but Seattle’s going to weather the recession a lot better than most markets,” said Stephanie Hession, a real-estate economist with PPR. Still, even with Seattle’s rents largely in positive territory, Ms. Hession says inflation will leave most landlords losing ground.

Sadly, the article is long on rosy talk and short on actual quantifiable facts. Why is Seattle “going to weather the recession a lot better than most markets”? Ms. Hession doesn’t say, and neither does the article. All we read is that Seattle has held up better so far, which is true thanks to our lagging housing market. If Seattle’s economy is based largely on software and airplanes, what specific arguments can be made that those two industries will hold up better than average in a recession?

It seems to me that when money gets tight, individuals and businesses will forego software upgrades, making do with what they’ve got, and cut back on travel. I have read quite a few articles that claim that somehow Seattle’s economy is poised to continue performing well through a recession, but I have yet to see a reasonable argument as to why this will allegedly be the case. If anyone here has a better argument than… well, better than nothing—then let’s hear it.

(Maura Webber Sadovi, Wall Street Journal, 09.10.2008)

→ 105 CommentsCategories: News
Tags: , , , ,

Housing Crisis Not Over, Just Starting in Seattle

By The Tim on May 7th, 2008 at 10:21 AM · 53 Comments

A couple people pointed out a piece in the Wall Street Journal yesterday titled The Housing Crisis Is Over. I don’t doubt that the mere fact that it was printed in the WSJ makes it gospel to some folks. I am not interested in writing a rebuttal to this piece, as that has already been handled quite well by our friends at Calculated Risk. All I would like to add is to point out that this is an opinion piece, not a news article. In the opinion of a guy that runs a hedge fund and stands to profit healthily from the recovery of the housing market, the crisis is over. Not exactly a shocking revelation.

Meanwhile, Fannie Mae, “the nation’s largest buyer of home mortgages” announced huge losses today, and forecasts “a steeper drop in home prices this year.” Yeah, the crisis is over folks, nothing to see here, move along.

In other news, Les Christie of CNNMoney.com is singing a bit of a different tune than she was in mid-2006, when she was touting our “strong fundamentals” and declaring Washington State to be the “next hot market,” or just last summer, as the local market was hitting its peak, when she declared that in Seattle, “the housing boom goes on.” Her latest headline is not quite as positive: Bulletproof housing markets get hit.

Some of the last, best housing markets – the ones that continued to climb even as the rest of the country cratered – have turned south lately.

Seattle, Portland Ore., Charlotte, NC, and Salt Lake City all posted home price gains during 2007, even as more than half of the 150 markets tracked by the National Association of Realtors registered declines. Now they’ve joined the losers.

Of course, the Seattle market was never “bulletproof,” just late.

Speaking of the local decline, Zillow released their latest Quarterly Home Value Reports this week, which contain some interesting information about our area’s market. Of particular interest is the chart showing the approximate percentage of homeowners who bought each year that now have negative equity:

Seattle Negative Equity

There’s also a corresponding map on the charts page showing how all that negative equity is distributed around the region. Interesting stuff.

I think that’s enough to digest in one post.

(Cyril Moulle-Berteaux, The Wall Street Journal, 05.06.2008)
(CR, Calculated Risk, 05.06.2008)
(Les Christie, CNNMoney, 05.06.2008)
(Quarterly Home Value Reports, Zillow, 05.05.2008)

→ 53 CommentsCategories: News
Tags: , , , , , , ,

Big Downtown Land Deal Evaporates

By The Tim on April 25th, 2008 at 2:34 PM · 18 Comments

Almost a year ago, a family that has accumulated ownership of 13 near-contiguous acres of downtown real estate in the Denny Triangle finally put the whole lot of it on the market.

Clise PropertyMr. Clise is convinced now is the ideal time to sell. The job-market outlook is robust for Seattle, and the office market, with a low 5% vacancy rate for top-quality “Class A” buildings, is hungry for more space, says Michel Seifer, managing director of capital markets for Jones Lang LaSalle, the real-estate-services firm handling the sale.

Yet, there is a possibility that Mr. Clise, age 57, may have missed his window. Increases in the cost of borrowing — with the yield on the benchmark 10-year Treasury note rising to nearly 5.25% last week — could keep some previously active real-estate investors on the sidelines for this blockbuster, but inherently risky, transaction. Mr. Clise says if he doesn’t get the price he is seeking for the land — well into the hundreds of millions of dollars — he could still take it off the market.

Well, as reported by the Wall Street Journal yesterday (subscription), and picked up by the Seattle Times and Seattle P-I today, it looks like they were indeed a bit too late:

In retrospect, Clise said, the family should have begun marketing the property a year earlier, before the credit crisis deepened.
- Seattle Times

“Large real estate deals are not being financed right now,” Clise Properties Chief Executive Alfred Clise said Thursday afternoon.

Frank Bosl, a senior vice president in the Seattle office of CB Richard Ellis, said the move makes sense.

“The changes in the financial market are causing the capital for doing deals to be out of sync with the value of the real estate right now,” he said.
- Seattle P-I

Some see this as a portent of a growing trend in commercial real estate, heading into a downturn 12-18 months after residential. Personally I don’t follow commercial real estate really at all, so I wouldn’t attempt to derive any sort of market meaning out of this move.

Does anyone here deal a lot with commercial real estate? Have you seen a significant slowdown there, too? Or was the failure of this deal more a result of its massive size?

Story tip: Deejayoh’s forum post

(Jennifer S. Forsyth, Wall Street Journal, 06.18.2007)
(Jennifer S. Forsyth, Wall Street Journal, 04.25.2008)
(Eric Pryne, Seattle Times, 04.25.2008)
(Aubrey Cohen, Seattle P-I, 04.24.2008)

→ 18 CommentsCategories: News
Tags: , , , ,