Seattle Bubble

News & discussion about real estate & the housing bubble in the Seattle area.

Seattle Bubble - News & discussion about real estate & the housing bubble in the Seattle area.

Entries Tagged as 'foreclosures'

October Housing Market Stats Preview

By The Tim on November 3rd, 2009 at 6:00 AM · 26 Comments

Now that October is behind us, let’s have a look at the monthly stats preview. Most of the charts below are based on broad county-wide data that is available through a simple search of King County Records. If you have additional stats you’d like to see in the “preview,” drop a line in the comments and I’ll see what I can do.

Here’s your preview of October’s foreclosure and home sale stats:

First up, total home sales as measured by the number of “Warranty Deeds” filed with the county:

King County Warranty Deeds

County sales as measured by warranty deeds were up significantly (16.7%) from last year in October, and marked another month-to-month increase (5.2%). This is no surprise, since as I mentioned last month, the impending expiration of the $8,000 mortgage subsidy is definitely having an effect on the people who have been duped into thinking we have already hit bottom.

Next, here’s Notices of Trustee sale, which are an indication of the number of homes currently in the foreclosure process:

King County Notices of Trustee Sale

Foreclosure notices actually declined from September, which could signal either an easing in the foreclosure “crisis” or possibly just a continued lag as the pipeline from SB 5810 continues to fill. We probably won’t really know for sure which one it is until sometime next year.

Here’s another measure of foreclosures, looking at Trustee Deeds, which is the type of document filed with the county when the bank actually repossesses a house through the trustee auction process. Note that there are other ways for the bank to repossess a house that result in different documents being filed, such as when a borrower “turns in the keys” and files a “Deed in Lieu of Foreclosure.”

King County Trustee Deeds

A new record high in October, lagging the peak month for Trustee Sale notices by four months.

Lastly, here’s an approximate guess at where the month-end inventory was, based on our sidebar inventory tracker (powered by Estately):

King County SFH Active Listings

Looks like listings will be down around 13% year-over-year, and 6% month-to-month.

Stay tuned later this month a for more detailed look at each of these metrics as the “official” data is released from various sources.

→ 26 CommentsCategories: Statistics
Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Seattle-Area Foreclosures Appear to Resume Pre SB-5810 Rise

By The Tim on October 15th, 2009 at 6:00 AM · 65 Comments

Time for our September update on Foreclosure activity in King, Snohomish, and Pierce counties. First up, the Notice of Trustee Sale summary:

September 2009
King: 796 NTS, up 31% YOY
Snohomish: 421 NTS, up 42% YOY
Pierce: 479 NTS, down 11% YOY

Not surprisingly, as the newly-mandated 30-day pipeline begins to fill up, foreclosures seem to be resuming their upward trend across the Sound.

It’s interesting to note that as of the end of the day yesterday, Trustee Deeds (the actual repossession of a house at auction by a bank) in King County were on track to hit five or six hundred in October, well over a hundred higher than the previous high, set in July (and ten times the levels we were seeing in 2007). But we’re getting ahead of ourselves. For now let’s focus on this month.

Here’s a simple look at how September’s foreclosures compare to the same month last year in each of the three counties:

Notices of Trustee Sale

Next let’s look at the percentage of households that received a Notice of Trustee Sale (based on household data for each county from the American Community Survey, assuming linear household growth between surveys):

Households per Foreclosure

King County came in at 1 NTS per 990 households, Snohomish County had 1 NTS per 626 households, and Pierce had 1 NTS for every 622 households (higher is better).

According to foreclosure tracking company RealtyTrac, Washington’s statewide foreclosure rate of one foreclosure for every 264 households was 23rd worst among the 50 states and the District of Columbia (up from 30th last month as the short-term effects of SB 5810 begin to wear off). Note that RealtyTrac’s definition of “in foreclosure” is much broader than what we are using.

Following are the usual charts of King, Pierce, and Snohomish County foreclosures from January 2000 through September 2009. Click below to continue…

[Read more →]

→ 65 CommentsCategories: Statistics
Tags: , , , , ,

September Housing Market Stats Preview

By The Tim on October 1st, 2009 at 12:12 PM · 83 Comments

With September in the bag, let’s have a look at the monthly stats preview. Most of the charts below are based on broad county-wide data that is available through a simple search of King County Records. If you have additional stats you’d like to see in the “preview,” drop a line in the comments and I’ll see what I can do.

Here’s your preview of September’s foreclosure and home sale stats:

First up, total home sales as measured by the number of “Warranty Deeds” filed with the county:

King County Warranty Deeds

County sales as measured by warranty deeds were down just slightly (0.3%) from last year in September, and actually increased month-to-month, up 7% from August. I would not be surprised to see September through November sales make a stronger showing than is usual for this time of year, with the impending expiration of the $8,000 free money giveaway pushing people who are bad at math to make a rush decision on a highly leveraged purchase.

Next, here’s Notices of Trustee sale, which are an indication of the number of homes currently in the foreclosure process:

King County Notices of Trustee Sale

September was the second-lowest month this year, but still came in higher than any month in 2008. I suspect this number will continue to rise back up to around the 1,000 mark.

Here’s another measure of foreclosures, looking at Trustee Deeds, which is the type of document filed with the county when the bank actually repossesses a house through the trustee auction process. Note that there are other ways for the bank to repossess a house that result in different documents being filed, such as when a borrower “turns in the keys” and files a “Deed in Lieu of Foreclosure.”

King County Trustee Deeds

Second-highest month on record, despite the various changes to the foreclosure process legislated earlier this year here in Washington.

Lastly, here’s an approximate guess at where the month-end inventory was, based on our sidebar inventory tracker (powered by Estately):

King County SFH Active Listings

If our tracker is close to the official numbers, inventory may actually increase slightly from August, but will still be down about 12% from last year’s level.

I don’t know about you, but there’s still nothing in these numbers that screams (or even really whispers) “imminent recovery” to me. Stay tuned later this month a for more detailed look at each of these metrics as the “official” data is released from various sources.

→ 83 CommentsCategories: Statistics
Tags: , , , , , , , ,

What’s Behind Rising FHA Defaults?

By Jillayne Schlicke on September 21st, 2009 at 9:00 AM · 60 Comments

Note from The Tim: Jillayne Schlicke has been a valued member of the Seattle Bubble community for quite some time, and I’m happy to welcome her as a guest poster. Jillayne has many years experience in the lending industry and offers some great insights. She currently provides continuing education for real estate professionals through her company CE Forward.

I’d like to thank The Tim for inviting me to create occasional guest posts for Seattle Bubble readers. SB’s bloggers and commenters have taught me how to critically analyze local real estate statistics. SB was a safe place I could go on a Friday night when my kids were elsewhere and I was craving an understanding of what was happening during the 2007-08 meltdown. I am honored to give back to the SB community.

The rising default rate on FHA loans is concerning but I’m not terribly surprised. It’s really no secret that the government is using Fannie, Freddie and FHA to help keep the banks afloat by allowing zombie banks to pawn off their toxic crap to the agencies. Ultimately the taxpayer is paying the price as we see Fannie and Freddie continuing to run a red balance sheet and FHA headed down the same path.

FHA originations were all but dead during the real estate bubble because so many LOs favored subprime lending where underwriting guidelines were non-existent. But long ago, in a land far, far away, when we were rocking out to Duran Duran, Echo and the Bunnyman, and Joy Division, I was processing FHA loans for a mortgage banker in Seattle. When rates came down to a low of 13% I had about 100 files in process. I was trained to pre-underwrite my files so underwriting recruited me and I became a young underwriter at age 23, just old enough to go drinking after work with the crew. I’ll never forget Barbie Owens who had the entire FHA underwriting manual embedded into her brain Matrix-style (I know Jujitsu!) She could recite entire paragraphs from the manual verbatim. Imagine 20 female underwriters, all of us smoked, and none of the windows opened. That was mortgage banking in the 80s. But I digress.

Back in the 1980s, underwriting was serious business. We were treated like gods by the loan originators who worked in fear of us declining their deal. Only David Korch knew how to play it. He brought us ice cream bars on hot, sunny days. New underwriters were given bunny files; easy conventional refinances, to cut our teeth. Then we were sent to FHA training. FHA had a field office in Seattle with real humans who would actually answer the phone and our questions. At least once a year a representative from FHA would take new underwriters through a six week FHA underwriting course called Direct Endorsement 101. After we finished we could underwrite FHA credit only (on all FHA loans the appraisal goes through a separate underwriting process) as long as a senior FHA underwriter signed our files.

If an FHA loan went into default, it was presented as a case study in meetings so that all of us could learn from our mistakes. If an FHA underwriter had too many defaults against her identifying number, she was put on probation.

This all changed during the subprime days when FHA’s business went down to literally nothing. Today, FHA allows the FHA-approved lenders to appoint and train their own underwriters! Does anyone see the problem with that policy?

Let’s revisit early 2008. Wholesale lenders are dropping like flies, and six figure income mortgage brokers are sweating bullets trying to figure out how to make their next boat, BMW, second home, first home, and condo-in-Hawaii payment month after month. They see the writing on the wall and the future, as far as they could see, was FHA. Thousands of mortgage brokers rushed to become approved to originate FHA loans and hundreds of wholesale lenders and banks had to quick beef up their underwriting departments to handle the onslaught of FHA loans being hurriedly thrown at them.

Many of those underwriters only knew subprime loans and had never seen an FHA file, never read the FHA Single Family Mortgage Insurance Manual for 203b loans and suddenly lenders were making folks FHA underwriters overnight.

And now we’re wondering why default rates are so high.

FHA doesn’t make subprime loans. They will allow loans to people with less than perfect credit but this is definitely not subprime territory.

We have three main problems leading to this dramatic rise in FHA defaults:

  1. Pressure from government to use FHA for purposes of taking toxic loans off the bank’s balance sheets;
  2. Lack of education, training, and mentoring of new underwriters during the recent, dramatic rise in FHA originations; and,
  3. Lack of a large enough down payment from the homeowner to insure against falling home prices.

Negative equity combined with job loss, business failure, or other financial distress means higher FHA defaults are in our future as long as home values continue to drop, we allow banks to put underwriters into service with no training, and we let the politicians use FHA as a toxic waste dump.

→ 60 CommentsCategories: Features
Tags: , , , ,

FHA: The New Subprime

By The Tim on September 18th, 2009 at 11:24 AM · 37 Comments

Three facts:

  • Nearly 7% (and rising) of FHA loans are currently in default (source).
  • The FHA has cash reserves of less than 2 percent (and falling) of the total value of loans they guarantee (source).
  • FHA currently makes about 23% (and rising) of all mortgages in the USA (source).

Here are those first two points presented graphically:

FHA Loans

I’m trying to imagine a realistic, plausible scenario in which the FHA isn’t essentially doomed to be the next big Federal bailout, and I’m afraid to say, I’m coming up empty.

→ 37 CommentsCategories: News
Tags: , , ,

Trustee Notices on Pause Thanks to New State Law

By The Tim on September 10th, 2009 at 6:00 AM · 18 Comments

Time for our August update on Foreclosure activity in King, Snohomish, and Pierce counties. First up, the Notice of Trustee Sale summary:

August 2009
King: 614 NTS, up 7% YOY
Snohomish: 329 NTS, up 20% YOY
Pierce: 430 NTS, down 7% YOY

As we predicted last month, Senate Bill 5810 seems to be resulting in a bit of a lull in foreclosure activity as the extra 30-day pipeline fills up. Keep in mind that the new law only applies to owner-occupied homes, with mortgages minted between 2003 and 2007. Still, I am surprised that there were as many foreclosures last month as there were.

Here’s a simple look at how August’s foreclosures compare to the same month last year in each of the three counties:

Notices of Trustee Sale

Next let’s look at the percentage of households that received a Notice of Trustee Sale (based on household data for each county from the American Community Survey, assuming linear household growth between surveys):

Households per Foreclosure

King County came in at 1 NTS per 1,282 households, Snohomish County had 1 NTS per 800 households, and Pierce had 1 NTS for every 692 households (higher is better).

According to foreclosure tracking company RealtyTrac, Washington’s statewide foreclosure rate of one foreclosure for every 1,033 households was 30th worst among the 50 states and the District of Columbia (down from 13th last month thanks to SB 5810). Note that RealtyTrac’s definition of “in foreclosure” is much broader than what we are using.

Following are the usual charts of King, Pierce, and Snohomish County foreclosures from January 2000 through August 2009. Click below to continue…

[Read more →]

→ 18 CommentsCategories: Statistics
Tags: , , , ,